Yang Daqing: "The Chinese Version Of The Marshall Plan" Is A Black Hat.

The strategy of "one belt and one road" is the Chinese version of the Marshall plan.

In November 8th, China announced that it would invest $40 billion to build Silk Road Fund.

But people with some common sense of history should understand how bad the Chinese version of the Marshall plan is. It not only misunderstands the connotation of China's silk road construction, but also gives advice to those western countries that are trying to smear the "go global" strategy of China's high-speed rail.

What is the "Marshall plan" in the United States? It is the product of the cold war in the era of Soviet Union hegemony.

After the end of World War II, in order to help European allies, and at the same time, in order to counter the Soviet Union, the United States Secretary of state Marshall proposed a reconstruction plan for economic assistance to European allies.

The implementation of the "Marshall plan" did revive Western Europe, but it also constructed a cold war economic iron curtain between the East and the West against the Eurasian continent.

Its essence is economic war, and the result is confrontation bulwark.

China's "one belt and one way" strategy is a strategy to spread peace and win win. It is a new strategy to inherit the historical gene of China's peaceful coexistence and integrate the new ideas of global economic integration.

"One belt and one road" to the west is land.

More than 2000 years ago, Zhang Qian spread the culture of Central Plains in the western region, not the invasion and killing of the Attila west of the Xiongnu king when he plundered Europe. The East and South Sea Silk Road, more than 600 years ago, Zheng He's voyage to the Western Pacific brought peace to the countries along the line.

Instead of Magellan and Drake's colonial plunder.

It is the only country in the history of the great power of the world that has long maintained farming culture.

Farming culture is a culture of defensive nature. Harmony is precious. It is not an aggressive culture of nomadic people.

China's efforts to promote the revival of the Silk Road and inherit the spirit of peace between Zhang Qian, Zheng and neighbouring and friendly in culture are totally different from the cold war spirit of the "Marshall plan". In the spirit of mutual benefit and win-win spirit, we do not seek to build barriers, which is totally contrary to the "Marshall plan".

The US "Marshall plan" has helped the railways of the European Union and other infrastructures. China's "one belt and one way" strategy will also focus on infrastructure construction such as high-speed rail, but these two are fundamentally different.

If the image is understood, the construction of the cold war iron curtain by the US investment railway and other plans is to send a scimitar to dismember the Eurasian continent. Now, China's high-speed rail is promoting the global interconnection and interconnection.

Railway is the main artery on the Silk Road, but China's high-speed rail strategy of "going out" has many obstacles.

For a long time, the global high-speed railway market has been monopolized by Kawasaki heavy industries, Germany SIEMENS, France Alston and Bombardier Canada.

Faced with China's high-speed rail coming from behind, the Western high-speed railway inevitably suffers from psychological imbalance, and western public opinion has continuously discredited China's high-speed rail.

In October 23rd, China north car successfully bid for the Boston metro project. This is the first time that Chinese railway equipment enterprises have won the global bidding in the US.

But then Japan and other enterprises soon gathered together, claiming collective appeal.

In November 3rd, the Ministry of communications and communications of Mexico announced that the international consortium led by China South Locomotive and so on has won the Mexico City high-speed rail project.

But Chinese companies have not yet had time to celebrate. In November 7th, Mexico abruptly cancelled the cooperation.