National Costume Should Only Be A Concept Of Clothing, And Existence Should Not Be Derived From A Certain Standard.

National costume is just a concept with no uniform standard.

At the APEC conference in Beijing, the leaders of many countries dressed in costumes with Chinese characteristics attended the banquet and took a photo of the whole family, making the concept of 'national costume' once again aroused heated debate.

In my view, the concept of 'national costume' is acceptable, but '

The specific form may not need strict precision.

The concept of "national costume" originates from the sovereign States trying to distinguish each other from appearance. The national flag, national anthem and national emblem are the most significant manifestation. Along with this idea, there are "national balls" and "national flowers".

The concept of "national costume" can promote a series of characteristics of its own culture, but it is not necessarily the same as that of "Zhongshan suit".

Just like China's "national flower", peony, orchids, plum blossoms, lotus flowers and so on, many people have different meanings. Why should we specify a certain kind? Today, some people lack the absolute representativeness in Tang costume, Hanfu, or gown and Qipao.

Besides, China has a long history.

The series of clothes and clothes has changed more in the history of the river.

Now, if we want to unify the "state service" and not accept the acceptance level of the people, it is estimated that we can not be unified in the historical costume.

No matter in the West or China, the concept of "national costume" came into being in the sovereign state of the civilian society.

Once the European aristocratic costume or ancient Chinese official uniform finally faded out of history, an important reason is that the social class they marked is no longer accepted by modern society.

Therefore, the current "national service" has a sense of equality for all and everyone can wear.

The idea that "national service" represents a country can be understood, but it is strictly regulated.

The style and style may not be appropriate.

We can promote clothing to have more national characteristics, and even design different specific dress for different ceremonial occasions, but do not have to stipulate the details of "national costume".

Because changes in clothing are inevitable and personalization should not be concealed by standardization.

In fact, today's "national costume" has been more popular in application, but it embodies a distorted cultural psychology.

For example, the hotel cleaning staff, the restaurant waiter waiter wear many traditional clothes, and managers, foreman and so on are often dressed in western style clothes.

This phenomenon is the legacy of colonial culture, as if the height of culture corresponds to the height of clothing.

It seems to be only "waiter" and "inferior person".

The concept of "national costume" should start with changing this cultural mentality.

Some friends around me like to wear traditional Chinese clothing. Nowadays, traditional clothing has become an implicit hint of social status at some point.

But some of the styles of traditional clothes they wear are actually the clothes of the working people in the past, but today they mean "tall and tall". We need not laugh at this phenomenon, but we should affirm and encourage them.

In short,

"It should be just a concept, blending into all kinds of costumes to embody our cultural confidence without having to be a specific rule.