The New "Environmental Protection Law" Has Formally Implemented The "Cost Plus" Of Illegal Business Environment.

Illegal sewage disposal should be punished by the day, and there is no upper limit; the main body of responsibility through underground pipe sewage disposal or tampering with monitoring data may be detained by the public security department.

Since January 1st, it has been called the most stringent environmental protection law in the history of the new era.

"Officially implemented.

So where is it "new"?

Enterprise Environmental Illegal Cost "overweight"

In view of the low cost of illegal activities, the new environmental protection law has designed the rules of daily continuous penalty for fines, and has imposed penalties for public security detention for those who are not responsible for construction and refusing to correct or evade supervision through underground pipes.

Some people figuratively call it: "before is the penalty ticket, now squats".

One of the strictest measures for enterprises is to punish environmental offenses on a daily basis.

This is an innovative administrative punishment rule in the current environmental administrative regulations.

This punishment will greatly increase the cost of breaking the law.

The new environmental protection law stipulates that enterprises, institutions and other producers and businessmen illegally discharge pollutants and are fined for punishment. They are ordered to make corrections. If they refuse to make corrections, the administrative organ that acts as a punishment decision according to the law may continue to be punished according to the amount of the original penalty according to the original penalty amount from the following day.

In addition, the new environmental protection law also adds security punishment and joint liability.

It is stipulated that the four acts of refusing to make corrections, such as "no prior approval", can be imposed on public security detention. This will greatly deter the offending person.

Environmental impact assessment agencies, environmental monitoring agencies, institutions that maintain and operate environmental monitoring equipment and pollution prevention facilities shall be responsible for fraud in environmental services activities and environmental pollution and ecological destruction. They should be jointly and severally liable for other environmental protection activities.

Regulatory powers and responsibilities are more important.

The new environmental protection law gives new responsibilities and powers to the environmental protection department.

The environmental monitoring agency may conduct on-site inspections, authorize the environmental protection department to seal up and seize the facilities and facilities that cause serious environmental pollution, and the pollutant discharge units exceeding the standard and exceeding the total amount may be ordered to limit production and stop production.

This is a timely solution.

And the illegal problem of ecological destruction is of great significance.

On the other hand, the new environmental protection law also stipulates strict administrative accountability measures for the environmental protection department itself.

For the nine acts of illegal implementation of administrative license and covering environmental violations, the new environmental protection law stipulates that the responsible persons directly responsible for the government or departments and other persons directly responsible shall be demerit, record or demoted, and those responsible for serious consequences shall be dismissed or dismissed, and the principal responsible person shall take the blame and resign.

At the same time, it also made clear the regulatory responsibilities of relevant departments.

For example, many enterprises do not have EIA permission, planning certificates and land certificates, but they hold business licenses issued by the business sector.

Once an environmental pollution accident occurs, it will also be held accountable at all levels, and the relevant responsible departments will not escape responsibility.

The government is more closely related to the local environmental quality.

Faced with the implementation of the new environmental protection act, the pformation of the government's role bears the brunt.

According to the new environmental protection law, the responsibility for improving the local environmental quality belongs to the local people's governments at various levels. It puts forward a series of environmental systems, such as environmental planning, environmental standards, environmental monitoring, environmental impact assessment, environmental economic policies, total control, ecological compensation, sewage charges, pollutant discharge permits, and so on.

Moreover, local governments will face limited regional protection if they are not able to protect the environment.

The new environmental protection law is responsible for the local government's responsibility for the environmental quality of the region.

The twenty-eighth paragraph, the second paragraph, stipulates that the relevant local people's governments that have not reached the key areas of the national environmental quality standards and the river basins shall formulate a plan for the time limit reaching the standard and take measures to meet the requirements on time.

The people's government at or above the county level should incorporate the completion of the environmental protection objectives into the assessment contents of the departments responsible for environmental protection and management of the people's governments at the corresponding levels, their responsible persons and the people's governments at the lower level and their responsible persons, as an important basis for their assessment and evaluation.

The results of the examination should be made public.

The lack of environmental protection may affect the achievements and even the political life of the principal leaders of local governments.

At the same time, how environmental protection work is linked to the evaluation mechanism of cadres, this time it really rises to the height of environmental protection law, and is no longer as soft as before, but a real hard thing.

Units and individuals will be more active in environmental protection.

Environmental protection is by no means the responsibility of the environmental protection department. The new environmental protection law has changed the traditional way of relying mainly on the government and departments to fight alone, and promoted the modern environmental governance system of pluralistic co governance.

Governments at all levels are responsible for environmental quality, enterprises bear the main responsibility, citizens report illegally, social organizations participate in laws, and news media conduct public opinion supervision.

The sixth article of the new environmental protection law clearly stipulates that all units and individuals have the obligation to protect the environment. Citizens should enhance their awareness of environmental protection, adopt a low-carbon and frugal way of life, and conscientiously fulfill their obligations of environmental protection.

In the future, if the masses report environmental violations without local governments accepting or being treated negatively, they have the right to report to their higher authorities or supervisory organs.

At the same time, it is stipulated that all social organizations registered with the Civil Affairs Department of the people's government at or above the district level, who are engaged in environmental protection activities for more than five years with good reputation, can bring suit to the people's court.

The new environmental protection act also clarifies the responsibility of the whole society to actively participate in environmental protection, thus setting the "baseline" for public environmental protection responsibilities.

We can see that the newly revised environmental protection law provides strong support to the public in obtaining environmental information, supervising government departments and enterprises at all levels in carrying out environmental protection duties, and safeguarding their own environmental rights and interests from various angles, such as information disclosure, social credit archives establishment, solicitation, reporting, and legal proceedings, and clearly suggests that citizens should abide by environmental protection laws and regulations, cooperate with the implementation of environmental protection measures, and participate in environmental protection with a more scientific, rational and effective means.

Priority should be given to environmental protection in social development.

Before, in order to develop the economy, environmental protection has always been in the stage of pollution control. However, when the soil is polluted by heavy metals, the grain is no longer safe, and the heavy metals in the water exceed the standard, a series of problems that affect the survival of the people and destroy the ecosystem appear before people realize that environmental pollution can not be improved at any time, and needs prevention.

The new environmental protection law has made significant adjustments in the relationship between environment and development. The "environmental protection should be coordinated with development" is revised as "development should be coordinated with environmental protection". This means that environmental protection has become a basic requirement, and economic development can not surpass the limits that the environment can bear. The development of all aspects of society takes precedence over the environment and is compatible with the environment.

Protection priority requires protection from the source, especially for key ecological functional areas.

Delineating the red line of ecological protection and other areas such as fragile areas.

The so-called red line is an insurmountable boundary.

Delimitation of economic development zones should not be allowed to invade these areas, and protection will be more thorough.