Zhengzhou City Industry And Commerce Bureau: Footwear Merchandise Sampling 4 Percent Failed

The Zhengzhou Administration for Industry and Commerce announced the inspection of footwear in the fourth quarter of 2014 in its official website. The samples of 8 batches of the 20 batches of samples were found to be unqualified, with a pass rate of 60%.

This commissioned standard standard Technology Service Co., Ltd., Hangzhou branch, conducted spot checks on footwear sold in the circulation sector.

A total of 20 batches of samples were collected from shopping malls in Zhengzhou, and the extracted samples were tested according to their implementation standards.

The test items include sensory quality, peel strength of the bottom, wear resistance of the shoe, shoe heel, hardness of the heel, hooking mark, hook bending stiffness, hook hardness, hook bending property, and decomposition of harmful aromatic amines. The inspection items of the casual shoes are sensory quality, peel strength, folding resistance, wear resistance, lining and internal friction color fastness, shoe upper pull strength, decomposition of harmful aromatic amine dyes, dissociated or partially hydrolyzed formaldehyde content; the inspection items of the tour shoes are sensory quality, peel strength, peel strength, peel strength of the bottom wall, peel strength of the bottom wall, and the folding resistance of the shoes. Leather shoes

The color fastness of lining and pad, the decomposition of harmful aromatic amine dyes and free formaldehyde.

After inspection, the nominal trademark is "

For "CARTELO" batch of casual shoes, decomposable and decomposable aromatic amine dye items are not eligible; the nominal trademark "LEONARDO" is a batch of men's leather shoes marking sign, hook core bending rigidity (longitudinal stiffness) item is not qualified; the nominal trademark is "playboy playboy" batch of glued cow leather upper, peel strength and mark mark item is not qualified; the trademark "Gao Qi KUUKI" is a batch of women's shoes hook sign project is not qualified; nominal brand is "Coney COMELY" a batch of viscose women's shoes bottom shoe heel hardness, check mark project is not qualified; nominal. "CARDANRO" batch of men's shoes logo project failed; nominal trademark.

For a batch of women's boots, the bending stiffness (longitudinal stiffness) items of the women's boots were not qualified; a batch of waxed Kraft boots made of the trademark "FORLERIA law Ni" was unacceptable.

The distribution units of these 8 batches of samples are "Zhengzhou Wanda Department Store Co., Ltd.".

Related links:

WeChat sells "famous brand" bags in the "friends circle".

Very low prices tell people the obvious fact that they are not true.

A few days ago, the people's Court of Pudong New Area, Shanghai tried to find intellectual property criminal cases. Many of the defendants had the right job. They sold bags in the "friends circle" to earn pocket money, and their concept of intellectual property protection was weak. Few people realized that selling a holiday would be prosecuted for criminal responsibility.

Wang and Huang worked in the same company. The two were still good brothers who lived together.

Seeing the popularity of all kinds of merchandise in the "friends circle", two people had nothing to do with each other, and decided to start their own "entrepreneurial" road to earn some pocket money.

So, the two people released photos of all kinds of fake brand bags and watches from the WeChat mobile platform, and sold them in temporary residence.

Soon, two people were arrested by the police.

On the spot, the police seized two counterfeit LV belts, two LV bags, 4 PRADA bags, 1 PRADA billboards, 1 TUDOR watches, 1 AP watches, 1 1 Cartier watches, two 1 MONTBLANC watches and two two ROLEX watches.

According to the middle market price of the infringing goods, the value of the goods involved is worth 537 thousand and 600 yuan.

The court held that the accused had already begun to commit the crime and failed to succeed because of reasons other than his will. He was guilty of attempted crime and was punished according to law according to the accomplished offender.

The defendant voluntarily pleaded guilty, truthfully confessed his crime, and gave him a lighter punishment according to law.

Accordingly, the court made a penalty of two yuan for each of the 1000 defendants in the crime of selling counterfeit registered trademarks.

Feng Xiang, chief judge of the case, told reporters that the criminal cases of WeChat's "friend circle" selling criminal cases in Shanghai Pudong court had some common characteristics: first, the same place of purchase; the counterfeit goods were shipped from other provinces; the two was the same way of purchase, which was directly placed on the net after purchase; three, when the defendants came in, they knew they were buying fake goods, and thought that as long as the price was low, or marked overseas purchasing, high imitation, the original alone would be fine; four, WeChat's "friends circle" was just a display platform, after buyers looked good at commodities, they contacted the defendants through WeChat, and saw the goods, cash pactions.

Feng Xiang said that WeChat's "friend circle" this way of "spot goods and cash pactions" also brought difficulties to trial practice.

"It is neither like Taobao stores or Tmall stores, nor is it like Jingdong or Amazon. There is no sales record in the" friends circle ", which makes it difficult to find out the actual sales situation of the defendant.

Feng Xiang warned those who want to rush for gold in the "friends circle". Selling fake goods is a violation of intellectual property rights. According to the law, sales of goods that are knowingly counterfeited registered trademarks are subject to imprisonment of three years or criminal detention, and they are punished or punished. The amount of sales is huge, and they are sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years and not more than seven years, and are also fined.

Those who sell the goods should be alert in time.

Feng Xiang also reminds consumers that WeChat is a social networking tool based on friends. If it is only to relay photos on WeChat, it is hard to define that it is an illegal operation of intellectual property rights suspected of infringing on famous products, so consumers are hard to maintain through positive channels when their rights and interests are damaged.