Chemical Fiber Products Frequently Encountered Anti-Dumping, Polyester, PET, Viscose Is Involved In The Disaster Area.

In 2015, foreign countries continued to launch anti-dumping investigations on many kinds of chemical fiber products in China. According to incomplete statistics, during the year, the EU, India, Pakistan, Malaysia, Egypt and other countries and regions launched 9 anti-dumping investigations or sunset review cases of chemical fiber products in China. Polyester polyester fiber PET and viscose fiber products.

Experts pointed out that, in the future, foreign countries may increase their anti-dumping and countervailing duties on China's chemical fiber products. Therefore, how to deal with anti-dumping and countervailing investigations will be an urgent problem faced by relevant government departments and enterprises in China.

At present, China mainly uses the "four body linkage" mechanism to deal with trade friction cases. The "four body linkage" mechanism refers to the 4 responsibilities of the central government, local governments, relevant chambers of Commerce or associations and enterprises, coordinating and coordinating, giving full play to their functions and effectiveness, and jointly safeguarding the interests of enterprises.

In March 13th, the Ministry of trade and industry of Malaysia announced a 14.91% anti-dumping duty on PET products imported from China. In October, the Pakistan State Taxation Commission decided to come from China. Polyester staple fiber The product (PSF) levy a provisional anti-dumping duty for a period of 4 months, valid for October 2015 to February 2016. In addition to the export tax rate of 6.41%~10.53%, 8 exporters in China are 14.92%. In November 13th, in accordance with the application of the European PET Manufacturers Committee, the European Union made second PET to China. Anti-dumping Sunset investigation and case investigation, the customs code for products involved is 39076020.

It analyzes the reasons why foreign countries carry out anti-dumping on many kinds of products in China, partly because sponsors have to protect their own industries, and the other is sponsored by political factors. For whatever reason, once entering formal procedures, it will affect the legitimate export rights and interests of Chinese enterprises.

Experts suggest that enterprises in the face of foreign anti-dumping cases against China, should strive in the following aspects: first, enterprises should actively respond to their own complaints; two, seek assistance from the Ministry of Commerce, through the Ministry of Commerce in the country level to pressure on the sponsors or regions; three, when the chamber of Commerce coordinates various aspects of the power to respond, the positive cooperation of enterprises to the work of the chamber of Commerce has a great impact on the success of the lawsuit; four, it is related to the local clients and associations in the sponsoring countries or regions, so that the local stakeholders can actively mediate the relevant local initiating organizations.

In addition, it is also important for associations to organize enterprises to respond positively. For example, in December 14th, in response to the sunset review review conducted by the European Commission in November 28th on the Dacron industrial yarn encoded by China's customs code 54022000, the China Chemical Fiber Industry Association organized a special meeting in Beijing to invite experts and lawyers from the Ministry of Commerce's trade relief Survey Bureau to provide guidance to enterprises. While actively organizing the response, the association also reminded enterprises that efforts should be made to increase the added value of products and avoid relying solely on price competition, so as to fundamentally evade trade frictions.