Online Celebrities And Costumes Suspected Of Infringement Of Purchase Need To Be Cautious

Shop selling

The price difference between the fake and the infringing goods is more than 10 times.

Yesterday, the apology statement of an online shop on Taobao made netizens Tucao.

It turned out that a star at the CCTV Lantern Festival, which was sold by the shop, had to wait until March 1st for a unified distribution because of the logistics problem.

The online shop claims to have received more than a thousand orders, and similar products are also selling well, but lawyers believe that Internet sellers have been suspected of infringement.

Shop imitation

Almost synchronize with the party.

On the second day after the CCTV Spring Festival Gala this year, in February 8th, some sellers on Taobao only started to sell some stars and the same hot clothes. However, when the Lantern Festival was broadcast live in February 22nd, there was a faster synchronization of online shop imitation products.

This year, the CCTV Lantern Festival party just started. Mr. Li met the host Zhu Jun's suit. He immediately searched in the shop, and even found that there were several online stores selling.

An online shop customer service explained that they had internal information. They already knew the hosts and stars' costumes, and the goods were ready. They waited for the party to go to where they were going.

The owner, who claimed to have received more than 1000 orders, issued an apology yesterday, saying that the logistics and pportation of some express companies had not returned to normal just after the first fifteen months of the month. Therefore, all orders can only be counted as pre order, and the shipment is delayed until March 1st.

For such a statement, some netizens speculated that there might be no stores at all, and the shopkeeper was just trying to fool consumers.

Actress costumes

Price difference 10 times

According to the reporter's survey, the price of the same costumes worn by the stars at the evening party is very large in the shop, and even more than 10 times, especially the price of women's wear.

Reporters found Valen Hsu in the same shop wearing the same skirt, the cheapest 200 yuan, the most expensive is more than 2000 yuan; and Ruby Lin wearing the same long skirt, the highest price of the shop is 14000 yuan, the lowest price is only 998 yuan.

The price range of men's clothing is relatively narrow. For example, Hu Ge wears the same suit. The cheapest selling price of a shop is 5600 yuan, the most expensive one is around 20 thousand yuan, almost three or four times the difference.

After comparing the number of orders, the reporter saw relatively cheap online shop, the number of orders is relatively large, many stars with the same dress, the price of more than 500 yuan, the number of orders is relatively small.

Some buyers said that it was mainly like wearing the same style. There was no need to spend so much money.

Consumers also know that the quality of low price is not good, but they are very good at watching stars. They just want to wear fresh pictures for a few days, so they do not care about the quality.

Star photos

Advertising for alleged infringement

Sales stars

All of the Taobao stores have done enough work. They not only posted photos of star performance, but also uploaded some performance videos, even turned the actors' growth experience and the lyrics of singing songs into full play.

In addition, on the street side of Shenyang, some small shops also took advantage of the opportunity to change their spring clothes. Some of the stars wore the same costumes and some enlarged photos of the actors' performances were displayed in the window.

"This is a tort."

Fan Zhibin, a lawyer of Ming Bo law firm in Liaoning, thinks that online stores and

These practices have been suspected of infringement.

Because according to the relevant laws and regulations, these online stores and physical stores have not obtained the consent of the right of portrait, and have sold their products by advertising their portraits. This constitutes a violation of the right of the parties to portrait.

If the parties are to blame, the shopkeeper has to compensate for the loss in addition to stopping the infringement and apologizing.