Extreme Technology To Upgrade The Patent Counterclaim Guangfeng Technology "Double Meters" War

The battle for patent disputes between the two meters continues to escalate.

For the June 2nd Guangke Technology Bulletin of Kechuang board, the controlling shareholder of Feng mi (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Feng Mi technology") filed a patent lawsuit against the Chengdu polar rice Polytron Technologies Inc (hereinafter referred to as "Mi Mi technology") and the Chengdu polar meter vision Agel Ecommerce Ltd Tianjin second branch company, which was responded by official micro technology in June 30th. It indicated that it had submitted a request for invalidation to the State Intellectual Property Office on 3 June, and was accepted in June 12th. In addition, Feng Mi technology filed a lawsuit on patent infringement disputes and filed a case.

Public information shows that Feng Mi technology is mainly responsible for the R & D, production and sales of laser TV, and owns its own brand "WEMAX" series of laser TV. The main business of polar meter technology covers the R & D, production and sales of intelligent projection products. Its main products include intelligent micro projector series, laser TV series and innovative product line.

Chi Mi technology is a IPO company, which has been accepted in May 8th. When it entered the stage of inquiry in June 1st, it encountered the patent litigation of Feng Mei technology, a subsidiary of Guangfeng technology. This also lets some market people pay attention to whether is precisely "the patent sniper".

However, in response to this question, Guangfeng technology in July 1st replied to the twenty-first Century economic report reporter, calling it a "nonsense" and providing the negotiation process between 2019 and polar meters on patent matters.

"Double meters" starts patent war

In June 30th, the Chengdu polar Polytron Technologies Inc (hereinafter referred to as "polar rice technology") issued a statement in Guanwei that it had filed a patent lawsuit against the company about the technology of Guangfeng technology holding company. The company has submitted the relevant patent invalidation request to the State Intellectual Property Office and filed a lawsuit against the patent infringement dispute against Feng Mi technology. The case has been put on file.

The so-called "invalidation of patent right" refers to the system that any unit or individual considers that the grant of the patent right is not in conformity with the law and claims that the patent is invalid according to law from the date of the announcement of the patent right by the patent administration department under the State Council. If the patent is declared null and void, the patent right of Guangfeng technology will be deemed to be absent from the beginning.

However, in twenty-first Century, the economic news reporter noted that at the end of the press release, Guangfeng technology did not announce the counterclaim of polar meter technology. "Up to now, Feng Mi technology and Guangfeng technology have not received any court service documents related to litigation in the statement of polar meters." Guangfeng technology responded to reporters on the evening of July 1st. If it is true, Guangfeng will conduct information disclosure according to the regulations of the regulatory authorities in accordance with the regulations of the regulatory authorities after receiving relevant documents.

Prior to June 2nd, Kechuang board, Guangfeng Technology issued a notice, the controlling company's Feng Mi technology filed a lawsuit against the court on the grounds of patent infringement of Z6 and Z6X products, and requested the technology to stop manufacturing and selling the above products.

According to the announcement, the patent number is ZL201110086731.9. The invention is named "high brightness excitation method and light emitting device based on optical wavelength conversion". Feng Mi technology is the patented owner of the patent.

On the day before the announcement of the lawsuit, polar rice technology has just entered the inquiry stage of the application of the science and technology board. The timetable of "precision" also makes the market voice questioning whether this is a precise "patent sniper".

For the purpose of litigation, "patent sniper" questioned, twenty-first Century economic report reporters sent to Guangfeng technology 1 interview letter on July. "We see it as a nonsense," he said.

Guangfeng technology believes that this is in accordance with the normal procedures of intellectual property rights protection, timely and effective communication and negotiation with the other side through formal legal means, and has provided proof to reporters about the negotiation process of patent affairs since 2019.

The communication process showed that in December 18, 2019, Guangfeng commissioned a law firm to send a paper lawyer's letter to the polar meter (notarization service) on behalf of the law firm, which was responsible for the infringement of Guangfeng technology patent, which was manufactured, sold, and promised to sell the product of the laser TV product and projector product. In the lawyer's letter, it listed the product model of the alleged infringement and the infringement of more than 30 patents. Patent information. According to e-mail information, the lawyer received the lawyer's letter in December 19, 2019.

Guang Feng Technology said that after many communication between the two sides.

According to a piece of information provided by Guangfeng technology to the twenty-first Century economic report reporter, in March 25th this year, Zhong Bo, the legal representative of polar rice technology, took the lead to the company for on-site communication, referring to the patent issue, and requested the two sides to connect with the law.

In April 9th, Xie Mi Fang, director of the intellectual property rights company of polar meter, communicated with the patent in the lawyer's letter, and confirmed that guangmi used the patented technology of Guangfeng laser.

In April 10th, polar meter provided a general analysis of the patent in the lawyer's letter, and did not specifically respond to alleged infringement.

In April 22nd, Guangfeng technology responded to the patent analysis of the lawyer's letter, and clearly pointed out that the products covered by Guangfeng's patents were extremely high.

In April 23rd, polar meter proposed a 1 million royalty scheme.

In April 24th, Chao Mi replied that the rice side was not infringing.

In May 6th, the CFO Mi Liao Yang came to the company to express its willingness to carry out business cooperation and exchange questions on patent issues, and expressed no fear of being sued.

"We can see that from last December to May this year, we have been negotiating this matter." Guangfeng technology said.

In this process, the twenty-first Century economic report reporter has not yet been confirmed from the extreme meters.

Prior to Guangfeng technology response to the twenty-first Century economic report reporter litigation time and reason, said, "as early as December 2019, Feng Mei Technology Holding Company Guangfeng technology, which is commissioned by the law to manufacture, sell and promise sales of 15 laser TV products and projector products, is alleged to have infringed Guangfeng technology's 33 legitimate and effective patent rights. The matter has not been resolved in substance. "

In this regard, twenty-first Century economic report reporters sent an interview outline to polar meter technology on July 1, hoping to understand the communication situation and progress. "The company is now in a silent period, and the details are not convenient to disclose," he said. But on the whole, we are very confident about the intelligent micro investment industry. We welcome the benign exchange of the industry, and also call for adhering to the right business path and focusing on the main business.

Behind the frequent patent litigation

In twenty-first Century, the economic news reporter noted that the patent litigation of Ke Chuang Chuang was frequent.

In fact, Guangfeng technology, a listed company that launched patent litigation against polar rice technology, has suffered many patent lawsuits from its peers. In June 17th, it also issued a notice requesting invalidation of the "light source system and the projection device containing the light source system" (patent number: ZL201010624724.5), and the "patent litigation" of Delta Electronics.

Fortunately, however, the "patent litigation" began after the successful listing of Guangfeng technology. In less than 1 months after the listing of Guangfeng technology, Delta Electronics filed 3 patent infringement lawsuits. It believed that Guangfeng technology and other related parties made, sold and promised to sell the "Guangfeng Aurora projector" (specification: AL-LX410UST), violating its "fluorescent dye wheel and its applicable light source system", "optical system" and "blue light synthesis method and system" 3 invention patents. Right, the first case of patent litigation was launched.

"Generally speaking, it takes 6 months to two or three years for a patent litigation to take place." Tan Zongcheng, lawyer and patent agent of Guangdong Shen Hong Dun law firm, told the twenty-first Century business reporter.

In the critical period of IPO, patent litigation has also been brought to the market to see what impact it will have on the IPO process of polar technology.

As for the purpose of the counterclaim and the possibility of reconciliation, pole technology still refuses to disclose more information to the economic news reporters in twenty-first Century on the grounds of silence.

In response to the possibility of reconciliation, Guangfeng technology responded to the twenty-first Century economic news reporter that the possibility of reconciliation is more dependent on his attitude towards intellectual property rights.

It indicated that the lawsuit against "Chi Mi" was a serious legal act after Guangfeng failed to negotiate the purpose of reconciliation. "Our view on patent rights protection is: it does not hinder the progress of the industry, but just promotes the progress of the industry. With the vigorous development of the science and technology board, the intellectual property protection will be more effectively applied in the science and technology board.

Guangfeng hopes to make more contributions to the healthy development of the industry with the same industry. With the launch of the science and technology board, there will be a number of international science and technology companies that are actively safeguarding their rights. These enterprises are different from traditional enterprises. They will launch their patent rights protection. Taking Guangfeng as an example, the lawsuit before the listing and CASIO from the State Intellectual Property Office to the Supreme People's court will finally be reconciled globally. Later, in the case of Taida litigation, it actively respondent, and patent litigation against Delta in Virginia Eastern Federal District Court, indicating that China's science and technology enterprises have already been able to compete on the international platform. The emergence of positive rights protection in China is a normal phenomenon.

?