The Clothing Store Was Protected By The Football Association.

　 A clothing store used to sell clothes in the name of the Football Association. It was discovered by the football association that in order to protect its intellectual property rights, the Football Association went all the way to fight the lawsuit.

How can the football association come from far away to fight the lawsuit? It turned out that they were selling clothes, trousers, sports suits and so on without permission. The football association has applied for more than 20 registered trademarks of products in China, so they think they have purchased infringement and claim 500 thousand yuan.

In comparison with the court, the trademark "ITALIA" in the sports jacket and sports trousers is all shield like, and the registered trademark of the plaintiff is all shield shaped. The letters "ITALIA" and "FIGC" have the same letters and the same shape. They all contain crescent shaped elements surrounded by tricolor blocks, longitudinal long shields, tricolor blocks and Pentagram stars. The number and color of the pentagram, the size and location of the three color crescent shaped patches are slightly different, but the overall structure of each element combination is similar.

Although these sportswear labels have their own trademarks on the sports jacket collar, they have highlighted the use of the "ITALIA" shield brand logo similar to the plaintiff's trademark in the position of the sports vest and the lower right side of the sports pants. Therefore, the court decided that the defendant, Tang, had constituted a violation of the exclusive right to use the registered trademark and had to pay 100 thousand yuan.

   Notice "Ai Fu" was awarded 180 thousand

A food company has made unauthorized use of the "DOVE/" Silk skating milk chocolate product and the "DOVE/" milk flavor white chocolate product packaging decoration similar to the "love" silky chocolate product. The "love" silky chocolate products with the above packaging and packaging are sold at least in the market. To this end, the United States has "DOVE/", "crispy rice" and other brands of the United States will be "Ai Fu" to the court. The court found that Tianlong food counterfeit products sold by the plaintiff for the well-known decoration of the well-known commodities had constituted unfair competition, and the economic loss should be compensated by 180 thousand yuan.

　　 "PUMA" catch Li Gui shop compensate 35 thousand

In December 31, 2009, the notaries entrusted by the "PUMA" company came to a shop on the road to buy two windbreaker and paid 200 yuan. Careful examination revealed that the windbreaker was used in the right chest, back, hanging tag, water mark and zipper head. It used trademark similar to the leopard graphic logo. In the size tag and tag board, it used trademark similar to the "PUMA" and the leopard graphic trademark. The "PUMA" trademark and "Puma" pattern were used on the front side of the garment, such as dark stripe, water mark and hat.

As a result, "PUMA" filed a complaint against the court. The court held that the shop owner ho Mou should compensate for the "PUMA" economic loss of 35000 yuan.