EU Formally Accepts Chinese Shoe Companies' Appeal For &Nbsp; Appeal Companies Call For Joint Break Up.

Recent high-profile EU footwear industry in China

As early as last year, the European Union had a strong interest in China, Vietnam and other countries.

The Attorney General of the four enterprises, Pu Ling Chen, revealed that the European Court of justice had formally accepted the appeal of Chinese enterprises.

At the same time, he also introduced the legal procedure of this pnational lawsuit.

Pu Lingchen said that after the lawsuit was submitted, the EU Council of ministers should make a round of reactions, and Chinese enterprises would make second rebuttal according to the Council's response, and then the EU Council of ministers would refute the whole lawsuit in written form.

In this way, several rounds of defense are required. Each round of defence should be in 3 to 5 months.

According to the introduction of Pu Ling Chen, this lawsuit will take at least two years.

The first round of EU arbitration will also be terminated.

This is also one of the reasons most Chinese shoe companies choose to avoid.

Why should these four Chinese enterprises fight this lawsuit resolutely? One of the representatives of enterprises, Wang Zhentao, President of China AOKANG group, said that abandoning litigation is no doubt a short-sighted behavior, and the defense against anti-dumping is the mission of every Chinese.

Wang Zhentao said, have you ever thought about it, if the EU gives you 16.5% tax now, what if it is two years later? What if it is extended to 5 years? We put forward the lawsuit, which is to let the European Union, especially the country that voted against the vote, hear the voice of the Chinese shoe company.

Before joining the WTO, the work was done by the government; after joining the WTO, it was necessary for the enterprises to go to litigation, negotiate and communicate with themselves.

Second, we win the battle for the lawsuit.

In a sense, this lawsuit does not benefit from four enterprises, but also the whole industry and even outside the industry.

Su Chaoying, Secretary General of the China Leather Association, believes that because the industry associations do not have independent legal personality, they can not intervene in the EU litigation, and Chinese shoe manufacturers are generally inexperienced in the international market. Because of this, Chinese enterprises should practice and make joint efforts on the road ahead.

Su Chaoying said that the lack of experience often makes Chinese enterprises appear inexperienced in the face of trade barriers, which requires enterprises to go out boldly, expand, summarize and ponder.

On the other hand, our industry is also in urgent need of full and effective exchange with the international market, including the European Union.

If the first aspect is to bury our heads and walk in a solid way, the second aspect is to look up at the sky in a timely fashion.

While accelerating international development, we also strive to establish a responsible new image of China's footwear industry.

It is understood that since the EU's ruling, China's footwear exports to the EU have dropped by 1/3.

In the face of trade barriers, Chinese enterprises need not only courage but also wisdom and reason.

What kind of rules of game is China's shoe industry under? What kind of game rules do we have been dumping? In the face of colored glasses in some countries, where will Chinese enterprises go?