Home >

How Can Managers Make A "Beforehand Zhu Geliang"?

2010/10/9 17:57:00 87

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

stay

Economics

Such a phenomenon often occurs in the development of things, that is, "Zhu Geliang after the event".

Therefore, there is a question to answer, that is, how can we do "beforehand Zhu Geliang", why is it difficult for people to make a "advance Zhu Geliang"? Yes, why? I have found that the fundamental difference between the "ex Zhu Geliang" and "post Zhu Geliang" of economic things lies in whether they are identified.

Economics

The ability of resources and economic capital.

What do you mean?

That is to say, if a person can distinguish what is economic in advance,

Resources

Which is the capital of economic sense and the truth that "resources are the mother of capital", then he is a "Zhu Geliang in advance" instead of "ex post Zhu Geliang".

What is the prerequisite for making a "pre Zhu Geliang"? Indeed, in addition to having the above knowledge, we need to first figure out what kind of things and things have future nature.

How to avoid being an ex post Zhu Geliang?

In the capital economy,

market

In today's highly developed economy, everyone wants to get more wealth.

In fact, it's hard for people to do that.

Where is the problem? As the discoverer of the law of "regularity arising from the field", I think the fundamental reason is that people do not all understand that "resources are the mother of capital".

It is true that it is not easy for you to understand this. Let me illustrate this problem with some things and phenomena. First, I would like to say that "resources are the mother of capital", that is, the mother of resources is the mother of capital.

Why should we discuss this problem? What is the author's conclusion that "resources are the mother of capital"?

At least, we should know and admit that the earth is the mother of life, the life is the mother of human beings, the human society is the mother of economy, the economy is the mother of capital, capital is the mother of enterprise's profit, and the mother of personal wealth is the profit.

The reason why we want to discuss this problem is to tell readers that whatever they are, they should have their own mothers, and capital is no exception.

Then, who is the mother of capital? Capitalist political economists believe that the mother of capital is capital itself, because they think that capital is the product of input.

Marx's political economics scholars believe that capital is the pformation form of surplus value, that is, labor is the mother of capital.

I think the above two statements are not valid.

First of all, not all inputs can be produced, and there is no possibility of loss or loss. Secondly, not all labor can be converted into surplus value. For example, labor in surplus production can neither bring the so-called surplus value to the people who buy this kind of labor, nor can they give the creative surplus value of such labor.

In fact, no matter whether capitalism or socialism, few people get rich through so-called labor, nor do we have to say that in today's world there is still a very unreasonable distribution system of "dividing the wealth of society" according to the amount of capital invested.

However, it seems that no one can deny that such a phenomenon is that some people are going to explode overnight, and some will explode poverty overnight.

There is no doubt that there are many reasons for these two phenomena.

So, is there anything in common? Of course, it is to see whether they are "ex post Zhu Geliang" or "prior Zhu Geliang".

That is to say, anyone who has the ability to "advance Zhu Geliang" can generally be the one who exploits the rich overnight. On the contrary, those who do not possess the ability of "prior Zhu Geliang" naturally belong to the "post Zhu Geliang" people, so they are also unable to make a master who can make a fortune overnight.