• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Analysis Of Standard And Method For Quantitative Detection Of Cotton And Flax

    2010/10/29 16:31:00 59

    Testing Standard Quality

    In the present cotton,

    Flax fiber

    After analyzing and comparing the quantitative detection methods, it is suggested that the FZ/T3003 - 2000 "micro projection method for quantitative analysis of hemp and cotton blended products" be amended as soon as possible.


    1 cotton and flax quantitative

    Testing

    Analysis of current situation and existing problems


    At present, the standard for the quantitative detection of cotton and linen blended fabrics is the FZ/T3003 - 2000 "microscopic projection method for quantitative analysis of hemp and cotton blended products".

    However, according to the quantitative analysis of the standard formula, the deviation of some results can be very large. This deviation is different from the content, generally from 2% to 10%.

    Such a large error not only exceeds the error range stipulated in the fiber content standard, but also challenges the significance of cotton and linen content test itself.

    So what is the reason for such a big deviation?

    In the exchange with peers, they also encountered similar situations in testing. This shows that the calculation and correction according to the above standards may be a problem.

    With this question, we conducted a comparative analysis experiment, trying to find new correction coefficients, so that the calculation results are closer to the true value.


    2 experimental situation


    Flax and cotton are cellulose fibers. After blending, they can not be determined by chemical analysis, nor can they be separated by mechanical means.

    This method uses ordinary biological microscope, micro projector or digital fiber fineness instrument to distinguish and count a certain number of fibers, and measure the diameter or cross-sectional area of fiber by means of a micro projector or digital fiber fineness instrument, so as to calculate the weight percentage of various fibers.


    On the experimental samples, in order to be able to reflect the different proportions of cotton and linen blended, the cotton and linen blend was set at 5% to 95% by weight method, and the interval was 5%.


    2.1 experimental operation


    Preparation of 2.1.1 slides


    In strict accordance with the requirements of FZ/T 1057.3 - 1999 "microscopic observation method for textile fiber identification test method", the above dyed samples were evenly cut from 0.2mm~0.36 mm long fiber bundles with the fiber slicer and moved to the surface pan, adding a certain amount of glycerol without water, and fully mixed into dense suspension.

    Use a wide mouth suction tube to absorb a small amount of mixed and uniform suspension on the glass slide, unfold it evenly, cover the cover glass to fix the sample, and note that the fiber can not be put outside the cover glass to avoid loss of fiber, otherwise, the glass slides should be re prepared.


    Count of 2.1.2 fiber root number


    The fibers were observed by an ordinary biological microscope or a microprojector.

    The prepared slides were placed on an ordinary biological microscope with a cross eyepiece and a magnifying magnification of 200 to 250 times, or a magnification 500 times microprojector stage. All kinds of fibers entering the field of vision were observed through eyepiece, and their types were identified according to the morphological and structural characteristics of fibers (see Appendix C and fiber morphology photos).

    Count from the top corner or the bottom corner near the view.

    When the slides move horizontally along the horizon, all fibers are identified and counted through the center of the eyepiece cross.

    After crossing every field of vision, slide the glass slide vertically 1 mm~2 mm and then move slowly across the horizon, identify and count the fibers, repeat the procedure until all the slides are finished, and the total count should be more than 1000.

    If the number of roots in the glass slides exceeds 1000, the glass slides must be counted in the whole range. If the glass slides are less than 1000 in the whole range, another glass slide should be made, so that the total number of accumulated fibers will reach more than 1000.

    Each batch of samples counted more than 1000 fibers in two groups. The number of converted roots of each fiber in the two groups was calculated. The difference between the number of converted roots per fiber was not greater than 10 in the two test.


    Determination of 2.1.3 fiber diameter


    The microprojector is calibrated to magnify to 500 times the projected plane, and then the prepared slides are loaded on the stage to make the measured fibers in the projection circle of the microprojector.

    Adjust the projector's fine adjustment so that the edge of the fiber image is projected onto the wedge ruler as a thin line, and the projection width of the middle length of the fiber is measured as the diameter.

    But do not measure those fibers at the intersection of two fibers and those that are shorter than 150 m, measuring 200 or more of each type of fiber.

    After calculating, the average diameter of each fiber is calculated.


    2.2 applicable formula


    The experimental results are based on the standard formula in the FZ/T3003 - 2000 "micro projection method for quantitative analysis of ramie cotton blended products" (no longer listed in the text).


    In the process of forming this article, my colleague recommended an article about the standard draft for solicitation.

    In this paper, the formula is revised on the basis of the original standard.


    3 Analysis of test results


    The test results are expressed on the average of the two tests. If the difference between the two test results is greater than 2%, third tests should be carried out, and the test results are expressed on the average of three tests.

    The test results were revised to two after decimal places according to GB/T 8170 (see Table 1, table 2).


    Table 1 comparison with current standard calculation results


    Splitting method flax


    Content /% experiment operation


    Result /% error /%


    3.011.54+8.54


    5.014.75+9.75


    8.017.97+9.97


    9.018.08+9.08


    10.018.18+8.18


    15.024.30+9.30


    20.028.46+8.46


    25.031.15+6.15


    30.036.24+6.24


    35.040.08+5.08


    40.042.88+2.88


    45.047.14+2.14


    50.054.61+4.61


    55.058.14+3.14


    60.064.37+4.37


    65.068.11+3.11


    70.073.50+3.50


    82 86.06+4.06


    88.095.72+7.72


    90.0101.43+11.43


    93.0104.33+7.33


    95.0107.03+12.03


    Table 2 comparison with formula calculation results


    Splitting method flax


    Content /% experiment operation


    Result /% error /%


    3.02.60-0.40


    5.06.77+1.77


    8.010.88+2.88


    9.011.01+2.01


    10.011.14+1.14


    15.018.75+3.75


    20.023.76+3.76


    25.026.23+1.96


    30.032.84+2.84


    35.037.17+2.17


    40.040.26+0.26


    45.044.86-0.14


    50.052.62+2.62


    55.056.16+1.16


    60.062.18+2.18


    65.065.67+0.67


    70.070.54+0.54


    82 81.10-0.90


    88.088.48+0.48


    90.092.54+2.54


    93.094.52+1.52


    95.096.31+1.31


    From the comparison of the experimental results, it can be seen that the result calculated by the FZ/T 3003 - 2000 standard formula is higher than the actual result of the sample.

    If the formula is used to calculate the experimental results, the average error is 1.67%, which is closer to the true value.


    4 some unsolved problems


    After modifying the experimental results with different coefficients and using charts, we find that there is a certain gap between them in different intervals.

    That is to say, if different coefficients are used to correct the same coefficient, it is very likely that the correction result is not very accurate in a certain interval, of course, the difference is very small.

    But why is this happening? At present, no reason has been found. Our experiment will also go on.

    • Related reading

    Discussion On The Standard Name Of Clothing

    Industry standard
    |
    2010/10/27 15:17:00
    79

    Standard Samples Of Feather And Feather (Sample Photo) Were Released.

    Industry standard
    |
    2010/10/27 15:13:00
    56

    Mandatory Standards For GB24613-2009 Toy Coatings

    Industry standard
    |
    2010/10/26 18:04:00
    46

    Fujian Garment Textile Standardization Technical Committee Was Formally Established.

    Industry standard
    |
    2010/10/26 17:05:00
    53

    Analysis Of Banned Azo Dyes In Textiles In China

    Industry standard
    |
    2010/10/25 17:11:00
    48
    Read the next article

    Cotton Picking Is Close To The End Of &Nbsp; Cotton Purchase And Sale Have Four Characteristics.

    Since the launch of the new cotton market this year, the purchase price of local seed cotton has been rising due to factors such as cotton yield reduction and resource shortage. From the beginning of September, the price of 4.2 yuan / Jin has been rising to about 6.20 yuan / Jin in late October. In a month or so, it has risen by 2 yuan / Jin, or 47%, rising 2.70 yuan / Jin, or 77%, the highest in history.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 99麻豆久久久国产精品免费| 中文精品久久久久国产网址| 亚洲精品www| 亚洲成人激情小说| 四虎免费久久影院| 国产精品无码素人福利不卡| 天天澡天天碰天天狠伊人五月| 成年女人看片免费视频播放器| 岳在我胯下哭泣| 怡红院在线视频精品观看| 夜来香电影完整版免费观看| 影音先锋亚洲资源| 国产青草视频在线观看| 国产综合久久久久久| 国产成人综合久久精品亚洲| 国产三级在线视频播放线| 国产免费黄色大片| 免费看三级电影| 亚洲国产一区在线观看| 久久久久久久久久免免费精品| www.四虎影视| caopon在线| 97在线视频精品| 91麻豆高清国产在线播放| 777奇米四色| 北条麻妃久久99精品| 五月天六月丁香| 久久伊人色综合| 精品国产v无码大片在线看| 美女胸又大又黄又www的网站| 老外一级毛片免费看| 污到流水的视频| 日本高清乱理伦片| 扁豆传媒视频免费观看| 国内精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 啊~怎么又加了一根手指| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 久久久亚洲精品国产| 97久久精品国产成人影院| 色多多免费视频观看区一区| 欧美天天综合色影久久精品|