On Several Modes Of Chinese Management

The essence of management is in terms of Confucianism, it is "an act of peace"; as far as Legalists are concerned, it is "utilitarian behavior"; for Taoists, it is "natural behavior"; for Mohist school, it is "altruistic behavior"; from the perspective of Yi ology, it is "humanitarian behavior"; from the perspective of Neo Confucianism, it is "rational behavior".

Because of the change of times, we can not build entirely on the basis of a certain family's thinking.

If we find it difficult to understand and even can not get started at a time, then we can build a "consistent" Chinese style management system with Confucianism as the mainstream and Taoist, Legalist and Mohist thoughts as supplementary.

In this way, it is impossible for us to justify ourselves by saying the truth.

In fact, most of these arguments remain in the "management science" level.

Because science has no borders and examines from the level of management science, there is really no American or Japanese style management, so there is no Chinese style management.

If so, "

After finding Chinese style management, everyone will launch their own efforts.

(1) enterprise type.

In the first place, the business community did not recognize its implementation of Chinese style management, lest it should be regarded as backward and undermine the image of the enterprise.

Later, some enterprises gradually tried to establish the banner of "Chinese style" and even opened up the export market, showing the strength of "Chinese style management".

(two) Japanese Confucianism.

Some people think that the Japanese study of Chinese culture is more thorough than that of the Chinese, and the Japanese style management concept is also largely derived from China. Therefore, a large number of Japanese style Confucian culture is introduced, and the "Sino Japanese homologous culture" is advocated.

(three) historical data.

The management facts in Chinese history are analyzed and explained as examples, and then the way of Chinese style management is pointed out.

So far, we still remain in the collation of historical facts, and have yet to be systematized, and still need to be organized into more concrete and feasible Chinese style management.

(four) empirical research.

The results of questionnaires and interviews show the truth of Chinese style management.

The credibility of the empirical process is quite high.

However, this research method has its own effectiveness, and there is nothing we can do about the exploration of Chinese management concept, the judgement of value and the construction of the system. We must do more in-depth research in order to achieve better results.

(five) self created type.

Not based on historical facts, create a set of Chinese style management.

In fact, it is a new management method, which has nothing to do with Chinese style, American style or Japanese style.

However, some people have to make fundamental changes based on tradition, which is more similar to anti orthodoxy in nature, resulting in confusion of ideas in vain.

(six) modern type.

The Chinese orthodoxy is in the "new day, new day". We should follow the path of "continuing the old and opening the new", and step out of the management of China's modernization from the traditional way, that is, to be a real Chinese first, and then to improve innovation rather than "no foundation" or "ruined" innovation.

Regardless of those types, it will finally highlight the characteristics of Chinese style management, which is the correct Chinese style management.

Otherwise, it is empty talk, famous but not real.

Because management is not a panacea, there is no one to manage the world, and no Chinese management can be used in all walks of life in China.

The management of every country is not the same: the material aspect, visible and tangible concrete, is basically the same; the mental level is invisible and intangible.

We can say this: Chinese style management does not care about adopting that form, because Chinese culture is inclusive and can be accommodated in any form.

But in essence, we must ensure that the members of the organization do well in a peaceful and happy atmosphere.

In fact, the existing enterprise organizations in Taiwan are implementing Chinese style management.

The difference is only the difference in purity.

The Chinese are best at the strain, what the form needs to have, as far as possible according to the requirements of the business owners, so it looks mixed.

In essence, there are different adjustments. All American style and Japanese style management has entered Taiwan as the custom and metamorphosed into Chinese style management.

Just wait for the time to come: the image of Chinese management will turn better, so that we will declare that we thoroughly implement Chinese style management.