The New Demolition Ordinance And Other Public Decision-Making Frequency &Nbsp; The Public Is Looking Forward To Not Taking The Form.

In the past half a month, from the second public consultation on the regulations on the collection and compensation of housing on the state owned land, the public hot debate has been drawn to "blocking the new deal" and "parking fee New Deal" in Beijing and the abolition of whitening agents in flour by the Ministry of health.

It is understood that only 50 draft administrative regulations and departmental rules have been completed this year.

In fact, both the NPC legislation and the State Council's administrative legislation have already been consulted openly. The institutionalization of legislation for public consultation was established in 2008.

On April 15, 2008, the chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress decided that the draft law for consideration by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress will be open to the public through the Chinese people's Congress. In March of the same year, the working rules promulgated by the State Council clearly formulated and formulated draft laws and administrative regulations that are closely related to the interests of the people. In principle, they should publish the draft and seek advice from the community.

However, compared with several recent public opinion polls, the reporters found there were differences in the means of solicitation, the way of soliciting and the result of feedback. Some public opinion solicitation activities exclude the network from the formal channels, and the results of the collection have not been received, all of which are already existing in the collection of public opinion.

Question 1

Abandon the Internet platform

In December 13th, the "Beijing blocking opinions" openly sought public opinion. The Beijing Traffic Commission announced that it was "gathering wisdom, brainstorming, giving advice and suggestions to ease traffic congestion, and soliciting opinions and suggestions from all sectors of society."

According to the bulletin of the window of the capital, there are only two letters and facsimiles. There is neither online collection nor collection of mailboxes. The network is excluded in the approved formal channels.

But on the same day, the parking fee adjustment plan for non residential areas in Beijing, which was hung on the window of the capital, was added to the online recommendation function.

In the announcement of the housing levy and Compensation Ordinance (the second public solicitation draft), the e-mail address was also given in addition to letters and facsimile addresses. At the same time, the "rules and regulations draft solicitation system" on the website of the Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council is also available for netizens to fill out their opinions online.

Question 2

The solicitation stage is early and late.

The reporters found that there was no uniform requirement for the official to solicit public opinion from the public at any stage. Most of them were soliciting opinions from the public after formulating the draft.

For example, the "Beijing blocking opinion" issued by the Beijing Traffic Commission, as well as the draft solicitation of many departments and regulations, are solicited after the draft.

However, it is also necessary to solicit public opinion before the planning proposal is drafted. For example, in November 2nd, the national development and Reform Commission launched the 12th Five-Year plan, and invited the whole nation to formulate plans for the 12th Five-Year plan.

Question 3

The degree of feedback is uneven.

In the feedback of soliciting opinions, the contents are not the same. Some of the soliciting opinions have not been publicly disclosed, and the finalization has been published directly. This makes the opinion submits doubt whether his opinion is accepted or rejected.

In July this year, the Ministry of agriculture publicly consulted for the implementation of the Pearl River fishing ban system. Three months later, in October 21st, the Ministry of Agriculture issued the notice on the implementation of the Pearl River fishing ban system. However, the Ministry of agriculture did not announce the collection of opinions on the system.

For the "Expropriation Compensation Ordinance", which has been openly solicited, the situation is very detailed. In the second public comment, the first time the opinions and suggestions received were detailed. At the same time, the number of opinions received, such as the scope of compensation, the scope of collection, the collection procedures, the implementation agencies, and other public concerns were also listed. What issues were the comments received, what issues were focused on, and what sort of discussions, modifications and modifications were carried out?