The Quality Of Children'S Clothing Is Serious And &Nbsp Is Serious. Is It True That "Difference Between Inside And Outside" Is True?

The quality of domestic toys is different from that of others. This is reported in some time ago. Now, the media also reported the difference in the quality of domestic children's clothing. The average pass rate of children's clothing in Guangdong province in 5 years is around 6, or even several times.

I think this is not surprising, just want to pick things up.

The quality of children's products is different from that of inside and outside; there is no difference between the quality of ordinary daily necessities.

There is no difference between domestic and international commodities.

Even spiritual products, such as the supply of reading materials, are bound to be different in quality.

"Inside and outside", this is a recognized truth in China itself. Anything, involving "outside", should be more elaborate, more attention to standards, and more care for people's feelings.

In fact, "distinction between inside and outside" can also be regarded as an international practice.

From time to time, we say that developed countries, especially those powerful countries, adopt "double standards" according to their own interests.

This "double standard" is, on the one hand, different means for different foreign countries; on the other hand, it is different from "internal to external" and "external": it tends to be mild inside, and external is fierce; it takes care of the feelings of its people and considerate the feelings of other countries.

No country in the world can be fair to "

We also have "internal and external differences", but the direction of difference is just a hit.

Domestic products are not qualified, this is not poisoning, after all, the cost of poisoning is the cost, and the failure is to save costs.

However, the effect of toxic substances is also quite different from that of poisoning.

According to the report, the double standards of children's wear factories become the unspoken rules. According to the explanation of some factories, the domestic sales of children's clothing are not up to standard, which is attributed to market prices, raw materials, testing level and supervision.

That is to say, enterprises do fairly treat all people in the world in accordance with market conditions.

The export price is high, the inspection is strict, the qualified raw materials are used, the domestic price is low, the inspection and supervision are not effective, and the unqualified raw materials are used.

If everyone does this, there is no such thing as a reverse sign.

Price gap leads to quality gap, good, but quality can be first-class, two, three and so on, may not necessarily be unqualified.

The price is low, but the qualified material is low qualified. That is also a qualified product. Why should the factory use the material that is not equal to the high price product but actually does not qualifying it?

Another industry insider said that the price of children's clothing in the Chinese market is not lower than that in the United States, but the cost of a large number of channels has eaten the profits, making the factory production link not profitable.

What are the "channel costs"?

The quality standard written on paper is also said to be very good, but domestic customers basically carry out "pure sensory examination", which is just like a local water supply department can not find water pollution and said: "we sniffed by nose."

Moreover, there are sufficient reasons for testing and supervision to form alliances in enterprises, but not to those who do not know who to consume.

China has "internal and external differences" and foreign countries, but our "internal and external differences" are converse.

Because we, whether as citizens or as consumers, are actually powerless, scattered and unauthorized, so we only need to be treated with some "ruthless" by others.