The Path Pformation From "Made In China" To "Created In China"

Photo: China's shipbuilding industry is rising rapidly. This is the modern dock of Dalian new heavy industry Co., Ltd.

Behind the replacement of a word, the value orientation of China's high-tech industry has changed dramatically in the strategic fulcrum of building an innovative country in China. "MADE IN CHINA" has been changed to "MADE BY CHINA" two years ago by Zhongguancun.

Behind the replacement of a word, it reflects that the value orientation of China's high-tech industry is undergoing great changes -- upgrading with "made in China" and "made in China".

Over the past 20 years since reform and opening up, the comprehensive strength of China's manufacturing industry has been greatly improved, especially the opportunity to pfer global industries from developed countries to developing countries.

But what is worrying is that because core technology is controlled by people, many high-tech products can only be "OEM" production, and fall into a strange circle of "output value in China and profits abroad".

As the world's largest manufacturing base for video disc player equipment, our country has exported $18 per DVD to a foreigner for a patent fee.

The most popular Chinese brand products in the international market are textiles, toys, lighters and so on. The added value is very low, so there is a saying that "selling hundreds of millions of shirts for a Boeing aircraft".

"Leaving the world's original technology," China's creation "is just an empty talk.

"John Deng, chairman of the central star microelectronics board of directors, said deeply.

As one of the earliest entrepreneurs who put forward the concept of "China creation", John Deng and his team used only a few years to rewrite the history of China's electronic information industry.

The "Star" series of digital multimedia chips developed by China Star microelectronics currently accounts for 60% of the global computer image input chip market, and the total sales volume has exceeded 100 million.

Behind this report card is a complete independent intellectual property system supported by thousands of patents.

With the trend of economic globalization intensifying, competition among countries, enterprises and enterprises has become more intense. Core technology has become an important bargaining chip for winning.

To achieve sound and rapid development of our economy, we cannot do without the support of independent innovation capability.

A number of objectives of building an innovative country proposed by the 17th CPC National Congress are directly or indirectly related to industry.

This shows that the shift from "made in China" to "made in China" has risen to a national strategy.

Enterprises are the new force in building an innovative country. Looking back on the achievements of major scientific and technological innovations in recent years, it is easy to see that the color of enterprises is becoming more and more strong.

From "Starlight China core" to the next generation Internet, from the SARS virus inactivated vaccine to superconducting cable, from supercomputers running more than 10 trillion times per second to the largest laser TV set on the world screen, these world-class "Chinese creation" all come from enterprises.

The experience of developed countries shows that only when enterprises become the main body of innovation can the national innovation atmosphere come into being.

In the outline of the national medium and long term plan for science and technology development (2006 - 2020), concerning the reform of science and technology system, the first thing to mention is to support and encourage enterprises to become the main body of technological innovation.

In Zhongguancun, there is a saying that has long been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people: the three generation of enterprises are selling coolies, second class enterprises selling products, first-class enterprises selling technology, and only those who master standards are super class.

Standards are the technical basis that is commonly observed in production, construction and commodity circulation. For an enterprise or enterprise alliance, mastering the standard is equivalent to mastering the whole industry.

For a country, the more international standards it has, the more comprehensive competitiveness it will be, and the greater the right to speak on the world economic stage.

In mid November of this year, the "flash" technology standard led by our enterprises passed the crucial round of voting of the international organization for standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission, and finally became the international standard.

This means that the world's first 3C (computers, communications and consumer electronics products), which is of great significance to the future electronic information industry, is already in a foregone conclusion with the international standard.

In addition to the "flash link", more and more enterprises in China have formulated standard strategies, such as the third generation mobile communications, high-definition broadcasting devices, and the next generation Internet applications, which have become the domestic and even international industry yardstick.

Some multinational companies have begun to abandon their prejudices and choose Chinese enterprises as innovative partners.

Innovation internationalization is an important reference for testing regional innovation capability.

Wang Wenjing, President of UFIDA software, told reporters that in the past 20 years, the two pioneering work characterized by institutional innovation and accelerated industrialization has made Zhongguancun smaller and stronger. However, if we want to become "world-class", we must undertake the third pioneering work characterized by internationalization.

The official website of Lenovo has more than 60 sub websites of countries and regions, and its internationalization is obvious.

Lenovo has not only jumped to become the third largest computer company in the world after the merger and acquisition of IBM's PC business, but also brought more than 1500 patents to IBM, and its innovation capability has been greatly improved.

He Zhiqiang, senior vice president and chief technology officer of Lenovo Group, said that Lenovo now has more than 2000 R & D personnel. Last year, R & D expenditure reached 2 billion 500 million yuan, which set up R & D centers in Beijing, Japan and the United States, and decided to invest 2% of revenue in product development and technological innovation in the future.

In the field of high technology, such as information, biology and new materials, China has entered the stage of innovation and development by tracking the world's science and technology frontiers, and has achieved a number of core technologies and standards with independent intellectual property rights.

Last year, the State Intellectual Property Office accepted 210 thousand applications for invention patents and hit a new high.

Compared with the mature and innovative countries in the west, China's innovation system needs to be perfected: enterprises have not really become the main body of technological innovation, and the ability of independent innovation is not strong; all the technological forces are self organized, dispersed and duplicated, and the overall operation efficiency is not high; the allocation methods and evaluation systems of scientific and technological resources can not meet the requirements of the new situation of science and technology development and the pformation of government functions; the mechanism of encouraging excellent talents and encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship is not perfect.

Statistics released in 2006 showed that only 25% of the enterprises engaged in scientific and technological activities were carried out by Enterprises above Designated Size, while R & D expenditure accounted for only 0.56% of the total sales revenue, while only 3/10000 of enterprises had their own intellectual property rights.

The difficulty of technological innovation between Chinese enterprises and pnational corporations can be imagined.

Some people believe that in addition to policies and capital guidance, the state should play a leading role in centralized investment and government procurement, so as to create a better environment for enterprises to create.

The chairman of a famous enterprise in Zhongguancun told reporters that the emergence of Samsung and modern pnational enterprises such as Samsung and modern Korea is inextricably linked to the special credit policy of the Korean government.

These Korean companies started losing money even though they were losing money for a long time. The government still required banks to provide loans and guarantee for enterprises.

In China, banks especially value the indebtedness index of enterprises, seldom considering the future of enterprises and the future competitive advantage of products.

In May this year, the famous Norton antivirus software caused two computers in the Microsoft operation system to kill.

The most serious information security accident in recent years reflects from one side that the superstition of foreign products is not conducive to indigenous enterprises' independent innovation.

A member of the expert group of Beijing information technology office told reporters that for a long time, many netizens and units agreed that "foreign" anti-virus software is more reliable, which is actually a misunderstanding.

From the recent report of computer virus epidemic, the trend of localization of virus is obvious. Domestic hackers and toxic web pages are increasing. The security risks faced by Internet users are mainly from China. Viruses such as "panda burning incense" and other destructive viruses are the first to be intercepted by domestic anti-virus software.

In order to promote sound and rapid development of the national economy and build a resource conserving and environment-friendly society, China vigorously promotes industrial restructuring and enhances its capability of independent innovation.

With the gradual implementation of various policies and measures, China's industrial restructuring has made positive progress since the beginning of this year, and the driving force for innovation has been continuously enhanced.

It is the glorious mission of history and times to focus our efforts on independent innovation and build our country into an innovative country.

Since reform and opening up, from the introduction of science and technology as the first productive force, to the strategy of invigorating the country through science and education and the strategy of building a powerful country with talents, and to building the strategy of building an innovative country, we have fully demonstrated that our Party attaches great importance to scientific and technological innovation and shows that our party has broad world vision and extraordinary strategic awareness.

Facing the pressure of the developed countries in economic and technological advantages, facing the surging new technological revolution and the increasingly fierce international competition, the Chinese people have the ambition, confidence and ability to seize the opportunities and catch up with them, and climb the peak of modern science and technology on the road of independent innovation, so as to enable our country to enter the ranks of innovative countries at an early date.

In the light of Long Yongtu's firm support for processing trade over the years, he encouraged the shoe companies to make their own brand comments and raised questions from reporters.

Long Yongtu responded that processing trade is not the same as OEM trade and low cost trade. "Boeing is also a processing trade. Tens of thousands of their components are imported from abroad and sold abroad by Boeing brand.

"Long Yong said that China should also be good at using its brand's appeal and R & D capability, making use of the opportunity of RMB appreciation, importing high-quality components and raw materials from the whole world to build a better domestic brand.

In the face of increasing orders and sales volume, some of the bosses who should be happy with the manufacturing industry can not enjoy themselves.

Because the profit is getting smaller and smaller, the more orders, the greater the possibility of losing money.

In 2007, the domestic manufacturing environment is undergoing tremendous changes. The cost is rising, the RMB continues to appreciate, the national export tax rebate policy and the adjustment of processing trade policies, and the increasing number of foreign trade barriers, many manufacturing enterprises have faced the choice of life and death. How to deal with these four critical risks has become a problem that enterprises must face.

As long as Made in China (made in China) is still in the "global dissatisfaction" position in the world market, then the label of Made in China may reduce the role of Chinese brands that have begun to move towards the world. These brands will avoid "Chinese elements" in overseas advertisements and try to cut the negative impression of Made in China.

However, if Haier, Lenovo, TCL and other famous brands simply fade the Chinese elements and the international market does not have a number of famous Chinese brands that can be called up, then the overseas consumers' overall impression and evaluation of Made in China will hardly change in the short term, which is a very unfavorable factor for the long-term development of Chinese brands including Haier, Lenovo and TCL.

The so-called Cheng also Made in China, defeated also Made in China.