Government Officials Luxury Shopping Ban Cited Hot &Nbsp; 70% Netizens Fear Can Not Be Implemented

Luxury goods

"

An investigation was made on how netizens perceive government officials' luxury purchase orders.

The result shows that 70% netizens urgently hope that this regulation can be promulgated as soon as possible, in order to restrict the rationalization and yardstick of government purchase.

At the end of the year, many luxury brands are aiming at the year-end bonus in the pockets of consumers.

And every time this consumption climax, how to lose and how to lose has become the focus of media attention.

There has been a survey conducted by the media.

The balance of men and women was 50, with the age of 30 years old, -50 years old. 64 of them said they would buy luxury goods by the end of the year, and 36 said they had no plans.

The desire to purchase luxury goods accounted for about 26% of the total gifts, about 34% of pure self use, and 39% of self purchase and gift giving.

About the price, people who want to spend 5000 yuan -10000 yuan to buy luxury goods account for the most, about 51%, choose less than 20 thousand yuan and less than 5%;

The formulation of the policy on the purchase of luxury goods will surely make many luxury brands lose their business opportunities at the end of the year, and promote the rationalization and rational development of the luxury consumer market.

Option two: 7% netizens choose "yardstick" for government procurement of goods.

Government departments must strictly control the "three barriers" to prohibit the purchase of luxury goods.

Good government procurement.

For government procurement, what is luxury? There must be an accurate and operational ruler, not just vague concepts, so that some people can fish in troubled waters.

For example, as a professional and technical unit, it is understandable to buy some advanced computers for work needs, but as an ordinary office, regardless of the price, the purchase of advanced computers is extravagant and wasteful.

Therefore, we must keep good yardstick, only set a good standard and determine the scale of luxury goods before it is convenient for execution and supervision.

The Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council issued a draft for consultation.

Make good operation "open".

The consumption of three public goods is not unreasonable if they are used properly.

But what worries us most is that some of the money spent by government departments is not clear, and the price of the market is very low.

This is an urgent need to fully open government procurement practices.

In my opinion, not only the content and price of open procurement should be demanded, but also the direction of the specific procurement should be used for publicity.

Only by giving full play to the role of public supervision and allowing illegal procurement and illegal construction to remain intact can we prevent government departments from prohibiting the purchase of luxury goods.

We should guard against violations.

A government department has been violated and exposed. If nothing is done, it will only damage the credibility of the administration and encourage the illegal procurement.

From my point of view, we must strictly enforce the discipline of violations: first, we must find out whether there is any hidden corruption behind the irregularities.

If so, we must severely punish them according to law.

In fact, every strange government purchase is a letter of corruption, which depends on whether the relevant departments are going to check and how to check it.

Second, we must severely punish the illegal procurement of luxury units, but also have to deal with hidden tricky procurement operators.

We should not only fight flies, not tigers, but also let government procurement staff become scapegoats.

Anyone who wants to spend money on public goods to buy luxury goods is on board.

{page_break}

Option three: 18% netizens choose "to a certain extent put an end to the unhealthy phenomenon of luxury gifts."

Here, luxury has been a commonplace as a gift giver. In fact, it is not only a gift for government officials, but also an ordinary consumer.

In fact, the rationalization of gift giving and government officials expenses is a relationship between reaction force and reaction force. The purchase of luxuries is no more than their own use or delivery to others, and at the end of the year is the "heyday" of consumption.

This makes the voice of "consummate rationalization of government consumption expenditure" prominent.

Therefore, there is a degree of constraint on government officials' purchase of luxury goods, which can promote the pparency of their consumption expenditure.

Option four: 68% netizens choose "hope that regulations are not going round and round."

Will the "luxury purchase restriction policy" be delayed indefinitely? This is the answer that netizens most want to know! Or, what netizens want to see is that the introduction of the policy can have a more powerful constraint on the purchase of goods by government officials.

Even if the answer is unknown, we should rationally see that at least the relevant departments have begun to attach importance to the purchase of luxury goods, hoping to change the current Chinese people's blind obedience to luxury consumption through some way or measure.

Point of view: "the linkage between government agencies and luxury goods is a bit abrupt".

What is the standard of luxury? The purchase of goods and materials by government agencies should be more standardized. Although the ban has partly restricted the problem of giving gifts to the public at the end of the year, there is no more specific standard restrictions. This is empty talk.

In addition, for government agencies, luxury goods are also very unexpected, not only luxury goods can be completed.

Point two: "government departments should not buy luxury goods".

With regard to purchasing luxury goods by government departments, I personally believe that government departments should not buy luxuries at all.

The cost of Chinese government agencies comes from the taxes paid by more than one billion people. It is hundreds of millions of people's hard-earned money, and it is used to buy necessities.

Besides, many of these taxpayers earn more than 2000 yuan a month. It's not enough to live at home. Many people can't get enough to wear. The children worry about tuition fees. How can our government use such money to buy boundless luxury goods? So I think this law is unwarranted. I can't imagine that our government is using luxuries.

View three: "the catalogue of government procurement and the further specification of the scope are gratifying."

First of all, this news should not be news. As a result of the improvement of government procurement projects, it is a gratifying thing to further standardize the catalogue and scope of government procurement. After all, our legal system still belongs to the continental law system.

Second, it will also lead to a new definition of luxury, that is, how can the government order luxury goods in the catalogue, even if the goods exceed the average market price, even if it is luxuries? Or will the industry and Commerce Bureau issue a luxury brand catalogue? Or is it a simple way to identify the luxury tax according to whether or not it is collected? This is a great aspect of my curiosity.

In the end, no one will be foolish enough to buy LV, and use Lv's invoice to make financial reimbursement.