The National Standard Of Radiation Protection Clothing Is Missing &Nbsp; Supervision And Common Sense Are Equally Important.

Events: experts, CCTV jointly "fight fake"

Recently, Fang Fang, a famous anti fake fighter in China, directed against the radiation protection clothing for pregnant women: "this is unique to China."

CCTV investigated the radiation protection clothing that was advertised to be able to prevent 99.9% radiation. It was found that under the condition of one radiation source, the radiation protection clothing could obstruct the radiation of 90%. However, the radiation intensity of the radiation protection clothing increased when there were multiple radiation sources.

Because the radiation sources in reality are never as simple as those in the laboratory.

A professional said that the effect of radiation protection clothing in the laboratory in a few minutes to complete the test, but no authoritative data.

It is also a standard. A series of food safety problems have long worried people about the backward national standards.

As radiation protection products are new industries, there are no relevant industry standards in China. They are neither medical devices nor industrial products.

The production and sale of radiation protection clothing is still in a blank state without supervision.

Relevant agencies: the national standard for testing is still being worked out.

It was learned that in December 2009, China issued a recommended standard for microwave shielding and protective clothing, and did not target the mandatory national standards for the entire radiation protection products.

At present, the standards of the radiation protection products on the market are all set by the manufacturers themselves, and the standards set by each enterprise are different.

Due to the lack of relevant measurement standards, there is no relevant department to supervise it, and no corresponding agencies have sampled the shielding effectiveness of the radiation protection products sold on the market, which makes the outside world have doubts about the current radiation protection clothing.

Gu Hongfeng, a member of the national clothing Standardization Technical Committee, said that at present, the national standard for the detection of radiation protection clothing is still being worked out, and the relevant departments have not quantified the relevant data and indicators.

Science experts: the quality standard of radiation protection clothing is not reliable.

Scientists have long indicated that radiation in reality is not enough to cause harm to pregnant women, and this time it is stated again that the so-called radiation protection clothing has not been able to produce ideal results.

In daily life, the real harm to human body is ionizing radiation, such as hospital X light irradiation, nuclear radiation and so on.

"Blocking the harmful ionizing radiation needs professional lead clothing. The radiation proof maternity dress on the market can not achieve the function of blocking ionizing radiation at all."

Moreover, electromagnetic radiation can bypass obstacles, use radiation protection clothing to stop electromagnetic radiation, and also need "full closure" to achieve the effect. Otherwise, ionizing radiation will still come through the gaps in cuffs, back, neck and so on.

According to Fang Zhouzi, a well-known science expert, he has been concerned about the development of this matter, and has learned from the Internet that some enterprises are calling for the national standard of radiation protection maternity dress. He is very opposed to this matter.

"If the relevant standards are formulated, consumers will be misled, making people think that this is useful, and the reason why they do not work is because the quality of products is not up to standard.

But the fact is, everyday radiation protection clothing has no effect at all and has nothing to do with quality problems. "

Analysis and testing should be supervised.

Emerging industries are not the reasons for losing control.

With the continuous development of technology, new products on the market are emerging one after another.

If it is new and irrelevant, because it does not ask without standards, does this mean that consumers must always be at risk? How urgent is every industry and a healthy market order?

In terms of the whole analysis and detection industry, we need an authoritative explanation and reasonable supervision order, but we need the popularization of "common knowledge of science".