• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Recast Civic Confidence, Starting With "Conocophillips Claim".

    2012/2/23 10:13:00 10

    Compensation Conocophillips Area

    A few days ago, 204 farmers in Long Island, Shandong, commissioned a lawyer to "claim" 606 million yuan directly from ConocoPhillips, which is second claims from the citizens of the contaminated area since the oil spill accident occurred in Penglai 19-3 oil field in Bohai in June 2011.

    By the end of last year,

    Hebei Province

    29 farmers in Leting County submitted a petition to the Tianjin maritime court to claim $234 million 700 thousand against ConocoPhillips.

    Recently, there is news that this difficult case filing "ConocoPhillips claims first case" has not made any progress so far.


    Prior to this, in January 25th this year, ConocoPhillips, Ministry of agriculture and CNOOC three released at the same time, said ConocoPhillips will invest 1 billion yuan to solve the problem of compensation and compensation for livestock and natural resources in Hebei and Liaoning provinces and counties in Bohai.

    Compared with the ambiguity that had been avoided by accident and compensation, the ConocoPhillips have been improved greatly, but the compensation figures still exist many fatal defects.

    The first thing to bear in mind is the "Absence" of the compensation object, followed by the so-called "1 billion yuan compensation" calculation process and standard, and the public can not know it.


    According to the "1 billion yuan compensation scheme".

    region

    Including the direct claim of Shandong Long Island farmers.

    Shandong Province

    The polluted areas have not been listed, and even the farmers in Hebei and Liaoning, who have already been listed, are still ignorant of the compensation scheme.

    It is very necessary to ask backwards what is the compensation area that the compensation scheme completed in the form of administrative mediation is completed. When the injured farmers are not represented, how can the default compensation decision cover all the damaged rights and interests? Is the 1 billion yuan compensation figure generally alleged to be enough to cover all the losses?

    Not to mention, the scheme has a long time to be postponed from the implementation of compensation to implementation, from implementation to distribution.


    We need to see that the present form of civil environmental rights litigation still belongs to the scope of general civil litigation, rather than the environmental public interest litigation in the true sense.

    The absence of public interest litigation has caused citizens to remain in a state of incapability for environmental public interests for a long time.

    Although the draft of the draft civil action law is being revised, the provisions of public interest litigation have been written to stipulate that the relevant organs and social organizations can bring a lawsuit to the people's court for the "environmental pollution, the infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of many consumers, and so on." from the Kang Fei incident, it is not difficult to see that the "relevant organs" not only reckless with the rights of civil claims, but also have less agreement with ConocoPhillips in the so-called "1 billion yuan compensation scheme" in the "restoration and maintenance of natural fishery resources".

    And the citizen who is most likely to say "no" is also excluded from the eligible body by the "public interest litigation clause".

    The long-standing plight of public interest litigation in China can be seen from the ConocoPhillips incident one or two, and far from being added to a clause in the bill.


    According to the experience of similar cases in the past, citizens' efforts to seek compensation through legal channels are obviously not only easy but also a difficult case.

    From the litigation process, although in accordance with the Civil Procedure Law

    Regulations

    The action of damages caused by environmental pollution is different from the onus of proof of "who advocates the proof", but the so-called inversion does not bear the burden of proof, but the injuring party (in this case, ConocoPhillips) is only "bear the burden of proof on the causal relationship between the exemption of the law and its actions and the consequences of the damage".

    Such cases still exist. The injured party has difficulty in proving the amount of damage, and the absolute superiority of the information, capital and technology possessed by the defendant, which makes the plaintiff in a relatively inferior position and is not easy to collect evidence.


    Moreover, such widespread cases as poisoned milk powder and other groups have repeatedly been subjected to various local accusations and far beyond the scope of the judiciary, resulting in a long time that the case can not be resolved and citizens have to give up halfway.

    Even more often, people are forced to socialized and politicize legal issues because of their poor access to law.

    government

    It is also easy to see and get accustomed to this dispute resolution, ignoring the accumulation of hidden dangers and contradictions.

    From this point of view, the two civil group claims that we see now have valuable models. Citizens' rights and interests are infringed upon, and the channels of choice and maintenance through legal means should not be remedied.


    Citizens choose to believe in the law, which is the trust of the authority of the state. In contrast, judicial practice is not difficult to find that Chinese people hardly see any public environment claim, and gain justice through legal channels.

    This country in the constitution expressly establishes the rule of law as its ideal of governing the country, and it urgently needs a lawsuit with benchmarking significance to recast the minimum confidence of citizens in safeguarding their rights according to law.

    Why does this node start with the claim to ConocoPhillips?

    • Related reading

    民間融資或成現實

    Expert commentary
    |
    2012/2/22 17:51:00
    7

    China'S Five Generation And Ten Countries Can Be A Warning For The Euro Zone

    Expert commentary
    |
    2012/2/22 17:00:00
    12

    Zhou Xiaochuan Said China Increased Its Proportion To Euro Investment

    Expert commentary
    |
    2012/2/18 11:13:00
    18

    Bank Charging Impulse Is Still "Irresistible".

    Expert commentary
    |
    2012/2/13 10:12:00
    4

    Wu Qing: Speed And Intensity Of Monetary Policy Fine-Tuning In 2012

    Expert commentary
    |
    2012/2/3 8:54:00
    16
    Read the next article

    Several Essential Clothing Concepts For Shoes And Clothing Enterprises

    Some clothing concepts that clothing people must understand will help to sell shoes and clothing in the future.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 爱情论坛免费在线看| 国产在线播放免费| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片| 久久久999久久久精品| 青娱乐国产盛宴| 日韩a级一片在线观看| 国产在线激情视频| 久久国产劲暴∨内射| 这里只有精品网| 无码成人精品区在线观看| 四虎影视成人永久在线播放| 久久6这里只有精品| 美国式禁忌免费看| 少妇性饥渴无码A区免费| 免费又黄又爽又猛的毛片| JAPANRCEP老熟妇乱子伦视频| 波多野结衣在线影院| 国产精品国色综合久久| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看下载| 国产97在线看| 无码日韩精品一区二区免费 | 久久精品国产一区| 香蕉久久夜色精品国产| 无翼乌口工全彩无遮挡里| 又色又爽又黄的视频毛片| jizzzz中国| 欧美精品九九99久久在免费线| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 久久精品国产99久久久| 连开二个同学嫩苞视频| 巨胸流奶水视频www网站| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人dvd| 3d玉蒲团之极乐宝鉴| 最新69国产成人精品视频69| 国产一级三级三级在线视| 一本色道久久88综合亚洲精品高清| 热久久这里是精品6免费观看| 国产精品亚洲一区二区无码| 久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁片免费无码影视| 美国式禁忌4桥矿超棒| 国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍 |