• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Wins The Trademark Rights Of Designer Christian Louboutin Red Shoe?

    2012/10/19 13:57:00 37

    Red ShoeDesignerManhattan

    This Tuesday, it lasted for a year and a half, and the highest legal disputes in the fashion circle were: the top shoe brand Christian Louboutin sued the Yves Saint Laurent infringement case and ended it with a white flag: YSL announced the abandonment of the appeal against Louboutin and claimed that she had won the conclusion of "knot theory". However, because of " Red Shoe The debate triggered by the controversy is far from over. Who is the winner of this war of rights?


       Designer Where is the boundary of safeguarding rights? I'm afraid that even Christian Louboutin himself didn't think clearly when he invented scarlet soles. "Red shoes are like lipsticks coated with shoes, which makes people feel like kissing." With the bare toes, women become sexy. In order to defend its provocative design, Louboutin applied for a trademark right in September 2007 (the official entry into force in 2008) to ensure that the scarlet sole of the brand was not copied.


    Who expected that the application of trademark rights against color itself would be perilous. Many brands would use colored shoes, including red with different colors, on a particular season or a certain type of shoes. Compared with the shoes of Tribute, Palais and WooDStock designed for the French fashion house YSL, the red paints with the same appearance as Louboutin have appeared. So Louboutin made an uncourteous lawsuit and brought YSL to court. Manhattan The federal court demanded that it be prohibited from selling such red bottled high-heeled shoes and asking for compensation of at least 1 million dollars. At first, the judge did not support Louboutin, but began to question its trademark ownership of red shoe. Thus, a continuous seesaw battle between appeals and anti appeals began. The personal relationship between Christian Louboutin and PPR (YSL parent company) chairman and CEO Fran ois-Henri Pinault is also facing a breakdown. Louboutin, the YSL counterclaim, thinks that its trademark rights should not be enforced on the "red shoes". "If Louboutin provoking our designer's dignity again, YSL has the right to propose a lawsuit to cancel its trademark right." YSL lawyer David Bernstein showed no sign of weakness to the media.


    Thank God, the court's final decision has left a step for both sides: Christian Louboutin owns the trademark rights of red shoe, but as a restriction, it is not infringing when the shoe is red as a whole. YSL has the right to continue to produce monochromatic shoes, and can re sell the YSL red shoes that have been put back to the retailers by Louboutin earlier. As for whether the French fashion house will sell the red shoes again, Bernstein claims, "YSL has made red its main color since its foundation day, which is part of the brand tradition. So I can't tell you whether it will happen again. But this case has clearly stated that YSL can sell shoes with monochrome shoes, whenever we like. The reason why YSL decided to end the lawsuit is to focus on business and creative design, not to let designers be in danger because of color. " This passage is obviously for Louboutin. The latter fear that the red shoes sold by the defendant will mislead consumers and infringe their goodwill. In fact, after the renamed Saint Laurent has a new direction under the leadership of the new creative director Hedi Slimane, it will avoid the feather feather of the Louboutin in the production of shoes.


    After all, besides the red soles, Louboutin shoes have other sexy details that can not be duplicated. From an economic point of view, there is no need to get to the bottom of the loss that can not be proved. The truce between the two sides is a wonderful and reasonable curtain call for this high-risk drama story. From the point of view of maintaining fashion copyright, this lawsuit is of great significance. It involves fashion, law, celebrities and consumers. The participation of public opinions has changed the whole case: it has been plagiarized and never been surpassed, which is perhaps the most ideal destination for designers.

    • Related reading

    經(jīng)濟前景不明九興控股公布鞋履出貨量近期下跌

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/19 13:53:00
    23

    Development And Positioning Of Casual Footwear

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 18:43:00
    16

    "One-Stop Purchase Mode" Has Become The Trend Of Shoe Machine Industry.

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 18:39:00
    19

    Quanzhou Enterprises Try Water Micro Animation Marketing

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 18:26:00
    17

    Women'S Online Shopping Shoes And Clothing Are More Concerned With Brand And Style.

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 17:49:00
    10
    Read the next article

    童裝店的櫥窗陳列設(shè)計我知道

    在進行童裝店的櫥窗陳列設(shè)計的時候要突出兒童商品的特性,櫥窗陳列高度的設(shè)計要符合兒童身高的特點,童裝盡量挑選色彩鮮艷、明快的當季最新款式進行展示,以此來吸引顧客走進店中,提高銷售量。

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 出差被绝伦上司侵犯中文字幕| 成人亚洲欧美日韩在线观看| 国产精品一区三区| 亚洲国产成人久久综合碰| 2021天天干| 欧美人与动zozo| 国产真人无遮挡作爱免费视频| 国产一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲av无码片vr一区二区三区| www.人人干| 激情内射日本一区二区三区| 天堂8中文在线最新版在线| 又硬又粗又长又爽免费看| 久久久香蕉视频| 黄色免费短视频| 日本在线视频www色| 国产a级特黄的片子视频免费| 中文字幕AAV| 色香视频在线观看| 成人免费无码大片A毛片抽搐色欲 成人免费无码大片a毛片 | 91精品国产人成网站| 日本免费成人网| 又色又爽又黄的三级视频在线观看| 一本色道久久88精品综合| 男人插女人30分钟| 国产经典一区二区三区蜜芽| 亚洲人成影院在线观看| 黄a大片av永久免费| 搡女人真爽免费视频大全| 加勒比综合在线| 97精品在线视频| 极品丰满美女国模冰莲大尺度| 国产人va在线| 一级一级特黄女人精品毛片视频| 狠狠色丁香久久综合五月| 国产精品污WWW在线观看| 亚在线观看免费视频入口| 色偷偷亚洲综合网亚洲| 女人让男生桶的视频免费| 亚洲天天综合网| 青娱乐国产在线视频|