• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Wins The Trademark Rights Of Designer Christian Louboutin Red Shoe?

    2012/10/19 13:57:00 37

    Red ShoeDesignerManhattan

    This Tuesday, it lasted for a year and a half, and the highest legal disputes in the fashion circle were: the top shoe brand Christian Louboutin sued the Yves Saint Laurent infringement case and ended it with a white flag: YSL announced the abandonment of the appeal against Louboutin and claimed that she had won the conclusion of "knot theory". However, because of " Red Shoe The debate triggered by the controversy is far from over. Who is the winner of this war of rights?


       Designer Where is the boundary of safeguarding rights? I'm afraid that even Christian Louboutin himself didn't think clearly when he invented scarlet soles. "Red shoes are like lipsticks coated with shoes, which makes people feel like kissing." With the bare toes, women become sexy. In order to defend its provocative design, Louboutin applied for a trademark right in September 2007 (the official entry into force in 2008) to ensure that the scarlet sole of the brand was not copied.


    Who expected that the application of trademark rights against color itself would be perilous. Many brands would use colored shoes, including red with different colors, on a particular season or a certain type of shoes. Compared with the shoes of Tribute, Palais and WooDStock designed for the French fashion house YSL, the red paints with the same appearance as Louboutin have appeared. So Louboutin made an uncourteous lawsuit and brought YSL to court. Manhattan The federal court demanded that it be prohibited from selling such red bottled high-heeled shoes and asking for compensation of at least 1 million dollars. At first, the judge did not support Louboutin, but began to question its trademark ownership of red shoe. Thus, a continuous seesaw battle between appeals and anti appeals began. The personal relationship between Christian Louboutin and PPR (YSL parent company) chairman and CEO Fran ois-Henri Pinault is also facing a breakdown. Louboutin, the YSL counterclaim, thinks that its trademark rights should not be enforced on the "red shoes". "If Louboutin provoking our designer's dignity again, YSL has the right to propose a lawsuit to cancel its trademark right." YSL lawyer David Bernstein showed no sign of weakness to the media.


    Thank God, the court's final decision has left a step for both sides: Christian Louboutin owns the trademark rights of red shoe, but as a restriction, it is not infringing when the shoe is red as a whole. YSL has the right to continue to produce monochromatic shoes, and can re sell the YSL red shoes that have been put back to the retailers by Louboutin earlier. As for whether the French fashion house will sell the red shoes again, Bernstein claims, "YSL has made red its main color since its foundation day, which is part of the brand tradition. So I can't tell you whether it will happen again. But this case has clearly stated that YSL can sell shoes with monochrome shoes, whenever we like. The reason why YSL decided to end the lawsuit is to focus on business and creative design, not to let designers be in danger because of color. " This passage is obviously for Louboutin. The latter fear that the red shoes sold by the defendant will mislead consumers and infringe their goodwill. In fact, after the renamed Saint Laurent has a new direction under the leadership of the new creative director Hedi Slimane, it will avoid the feather feather of the Louboutin in the production of shoes.


    After all, besides the red soles, Louboutin shoes have other sexy details that can not be duplicated. From an economic point of view, there is no need to get to the bottom of the loss that can not be proved. The truce between the two sides is a wonderful and reasonable curtain call for this high-risk drama story. From the point of view of maintaining fashion copyright, this lawsuit is of great significance. It involves fashion, law, celebrities and consumers. The participation of public opinions has changed the whole case: it has been plagiarized and never been surpassed, which is perhaps the most ideal destination for designers.

    • Related reading

    經(jīng)濟前景不明九興控股公布鞋履出貨量近期下跌

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/19 13:53:00
    23

    Development And Positioning Of Casual Footwear

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 18:43:00
    16

    "One-Stop Purchase Mode" Has Become The Trend Of Shoe Machine Industry.

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 18:39:00
    19

    Quanzhou Enterprises Try Water Micro Animation Marketing

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 18:26:00
    17

    Women'S Online Shopping Shoes And Clothing Are More Concerned With Brand And Style.

    Footwear industry dynamics
    |
    2012/10/18 17:49:00
    10
    Read the next article

    童裝店的櫥窗陳列設(shè)計我知道

    在進行童裝店的櫥窗陳列設(shè)計的時候要突出兒童商品的特性,櫥窗陳列高度的設(shè)計要符合兒童身高的特點,童裝盡量挑選色彩鮮艷、明快的當季最新款式進行展示,以此來吸引顧客走進店中,提高銷售量。

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 翁熄系列乱老扒bd在线播放| 久久久久亚洲av无码专区| 亚洲日本中文字幕天天更新| a级毛片100部免费观看| 野花香高清在线观看视频播放免费 | 久久综合日韩亚洲精品色| 99riav国产在线观看| 污视频在线看网站| 国产精成人品日日拍夜夜免费| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区日产 | 日韩不卡免费视频| 国产女精品视频在ktv| 久久狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠97| 视频二区中文字幕| 散步乳栓项圈尾巴乳环小说 | 领导边摸边吃奶边做爽在线观看 | 国产在线无码制服丝袜无码| 久久久成人影院| 老师办公室被吃奶好爽在线观看| 成人国产在线24小时播放视频| 印度精品性hd高清| jizzjizz国产精品久久| 精品国产美女福利到在线不卡| 攵女yin乱合集高h文| 国产亚洲欧美日韩俺去了| 久久99九九国产免费看小说| 综合久久99久久99播放| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁| 免费看男女下面日出水来| 99精品久久99久久久久| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线视频| 国内久久精品视频| 亚洲www在线| 青娱乐欧美视频| 小鲜肉同性同志videosbest| 亚洲精彩视频在线观看| av在线亚洲男人的天堂| 男人j进女人p视频免费观看| 国产高清国内精品福利| 久艾草国产成人综合在线视频| 午夜爽爽爽男女污污污网站|