Burberry Trademark Is Revoked Or Faces 500 Million Yuan Compensation.

< p style= "text-align: center" > < img border= "0" align= "center" alt= "" src= "" /uploadimages/201311/22/20131122031427_sj.JPG "/" < > > "

< p > pnational famous brand < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_x.asp" > BURBERRY < /a > has always been known as grid elements, but later, this grid element may no longer be unique to this luxury brand.

Yesterday, "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp "Lu Da Da polo" /a held a news conference in Guangzhou. It announced that it had successfully applied for the cancellation of BURBERRY a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp".

In addition, BURBERRY may face a huge claim of 500 million yuan.

Now let's know the details of the world's clothing and shoe net.

< /p >

< p > pnational famous brand BURBERRY has always been known for its grid elements, but in the future, this grid element may no longer be unique to this luxury brand.

< /p >

< p > yesterday, Lu Bi Da Polo held a news conference in Guangzhou. It announced that it had successfully applied for the cancellation of < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > BURBERRY lattice graph trademark < /a >.

In addition, BURBERRY may face a huge claim of 500 million yuan.

< /p >

< p > Tang Xiangyang, a lawyer of lbda Polo company and lawyer of partnership law of Beijing Ying Ke law firm, said that the company found that the registered trademark of BURBERRY had not been used for at least three consecutive years. It applied for cancellation to the State Trademark Office and received the notice of cancellation in November 19th this year.

Wang Wanjun, a spokesman for Lu Bi Da Polo company, presented the notice of cancellation issued by the State Trademark Office on the spot.

< /p >

< p > Tang Xiangyang said that the trademark that the BURBERRY was revoked was only in the field of bags and leather products.

This means that BURBERRY can not use grid pattern in trademark labeling, but it can be used in product design.

Other enterprises can use Scotland lattice elements in similar products design, and avoid being harassed by such trademark infringement litigation.

< /p >

According to P, the case of trademark cancellation is unprecedented in the field of luxury goods.

< /p >

< p >, however, the reporter yesterday called BURBERRY, a public relations official in China, Cindy, who was unaware of that. As of press deadline, the person still failed to reply to the matter.

< /p >

< p > a department store in Guangzhou revealed that 10 days ago, it had received a lawyer's letter from BURBERRY about the infringement of Lu Da Da polo, asking the department store to download relevant products.

However, the Department said it would restore the products of the road to Polo related products.

< /p >

< p > < strong > trademark disputes have lasted for 9 years, < /strong > < /p >.

< p > Lu Bi Da Polo company is called "Foshan South China Road" a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > leather goods < /a > Products Co., Ltd., according to the introduction, the trademark dispute has lasted for 9 years.

< /p >

< p > 1997, the POLO SATNTA ROBERTA brand leather made by Lu Da Da Polo company has been sold to Taiwan, Hongkong and other places in China.

The brand's leather goods and BURBERRY belong to the Scotland style.

Since 2004, BURBERRY has filed suit in Taiwan, Hongkong and the mainland on the grounds of trademark infringement.

< /p >

< p > because of the unbearable loss of huge performance, lloda polo and its related parties began to resist: after successfully finding the BURBERRY trellis trademark for at least three years without being used as a trademark, they successfully applied for the cancellation of the trademark.

< /p >

< p > Tang Xiangyang also pointed out that Scotland grid is a cultural heritage and can not be used as a trademark.

< /p >

< p > Wang Wanjun announced that the success of a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > the cancellation of trademark < /a > is only the beginning.

Next, the company will issue a claim of 500 million yuan for BURBERRY.

< /p >

< p > Chen Beiyuan, a famous class action expert and lawyer of Beijing Ying Ke law firm, said that 500 million yuan is only 9 years' performance loss of lpby Polo company, and does not include any mental loss.

He also called for more businesses to be prosecuted and suffered losses so as to initiate a class action lawsuit against BURBERRY.

< /p >

< p > > a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > > intellectual property < /a > expert Liu Yongpei pointed out that in fact, if BURBERRY only owns the lattice a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp "> trademark > /a >, it can not tell the enterprises using this kind of pattern element as the product pattern on the grounds of trademark infringement, it can only ask for the design not to appear on the sign.

Unless BURBERRY owns the patent of the pattern, it can be requested that other enterprises should not use the pattern in product design.

< /p >