Home >

The New Standard Of Textile Dyeing And Finishing Has Been Implemented For Many Years.

2014/1/17 16:48:00 45

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

Discharge Standard Of Water Pollutants In Textile Dyeing And Finishing Industry IPE Polo Textile Industry Research Uniqlo YOUNGOR Exceeding Standard

< img border= "0" align= "center" alt= "" src= "" /uploadimages/201401/17/20140117045044_sj.JPG "/" < > > "
 < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp > > the discharge standard of water pollutants for textile dyeing and finishing industry < /a > (GB 4287 - 2012) has been implemented for more than a year, but it has not yet been implemented in the whole country. There is still a large scale emission exceeding the standard of the enterprise in the implementation of the new standard. A year later, from January 1, 2015 onwards, the existing enterprises will also carry out this standard. Is the enterprise ready to go? Where is the difficulty of discharging the standard? 
 recently, the public environmental research center (IPE) issued the third phase < a > the textile industry research report < /a >, detailed the excessive emission of enterprises, called on enterprises to play the role of the green supply chain, so as to promote printing and dyeing enterprises to improve their processing requirements. 
 however, Polo, Uniqlo, a > YOUNGOR < /a > and other brands have avoided the violation of the supply chain's violation of the standard, and violated the requirements of corporate social responsibility. 
 > 5 textile enterprises nationwide 
 in Zhejiang, the number of printing and dyeing enterprises exceeded 400, accounting for over standard .
 > 90% of the total number of discharged enterprises 
 the report points out that our country has more than 5 a > textile factories < /a >. The textile and garment industry cluster mainly concentrates on the economically developed coastal areas in the eastern coastal areas. Among them, the dyeing and finishing links with the highest pollution discharge intensity are mainly concentrated in 5 provinces, such as Zhejiang and Jiangsu, especially in Zhejiang, Shaoxing, Xiaoshan, Jiangsu Wujiang, Changzhou and Fujian Shishi. The total amount of pollutants discharged in these areas has exceeded the carrying capacity of the environment. 
 the data released by the relevant departments of Zhejiang province showed that the local printing and dyeing enterprises had a wide range of violations exceeding the standard. In the first half of 2013, the number of printing and dyeing enterprises exceeded 400, accounting for more than 90% of the total number of enterprises in the province. 
 Shaoxing County of Zhejiang province is the largest industrial cluster base of textile production capacity in the country. The printing and dyeing output accounts for 1/3 of the whole country and has the largest textile market in Asia. The two most concentrated textile industrial parks in Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing Binhai Industrial Zone and Linjiang Industrial Park in Xiaoshan District, Hangzhou, are finally discharged into Hangzhou Bay. According to the bulletin of environmental quality of China's coastal waters in 2011, the water quality of Hangzhou Bay is very poor in all 9 important Gulf of China, all of which belong to the four category of sea water. In the bulletin of the Zhejiang provincial environmental status 2012, the Hangzhou bay also has a similar description. It is called "all the inferior four types of water quality" and "the water body is in a serious eutrophication state". 
 in Shaoxing, where printing and dyeing industry is highly concentrated, the situation of water pollution is equally severe. According to the bulletin of environmental status of Shaoxing in 2012, the cross-section of Shaoxing which did not meet the functional requirements in 2012 accounted for 65.7%. 
 the pollution of rivers and lakes in the Taihu river basin is also quite common. According to the bulletin of the Taihu basin and the southeast river water resources in 2011, the annual water quality compliance rate in the water function area is only 14.2%. In the Taihu River Basin, Jiangsu has one of the three largest bases of textile and garment industry in Changshu: Wujiang, Jiangyin. 
 in the Pearl River Delta region where textile printing and dyeing enterprises are concentrated, river water quality and water quality at the Pearl River estuary are also not optimistic. The Pearl River water resources bulletin 2011, issued by the Pearl River Commission of the Ministry of water resources, shows that the worst water quality is in the Pearl River Delta, the ratio of water to river length is 49.6%, and the proportion of bad type 24.7% is 24.7%. The bulletin of marine environmental status of Guangdong in 2012 showed that the proportion of the fourth types of sea area was inferior to that of the "sea water quality standard", which was 6.5%, mainly located in the Pearl River Estuary and the part of the harbor waters. 
 Enterprise preprocessing is generally over standard 
 the influent of sewage treatment plant is seriously exceeded, and the treatment load increases, resulting in sewage /p >
 the effluent exceeding standard of treatment plant is more serious than /p >
 in recent years, more and more textile enterprises have implemented nantube emissions, which are collected and processed by the sewage treatment plants after pretreatment. Because most of the enterprises discharged by the NNR perform the third grade emission standards in the original standard, and the emission standards of grade III are too loose, a large number of nanofiltration wastewater from printing and dyeing plants do not meet the requirements of pretreatment. This means that the influent of sewage treatment plant is seriously exceeded, and the increase of treatment load often results in the centralized treatment of sewage treatment plants unable to carry out effective follow-up treatment, resulting in more serious effluent effluent exceeding standard, and centralized treatment causes centralized pollution. 
P > Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangdong and Fujian have such situations. For example, in Xiaoshan Linjiang Industrial Park, a textile dyeing and printing enterprise concentrated in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the pollution control record of ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen and aniline exceeded the standard in 2013. Obviously, in order to meet the emission standards, the requirements for pretreatment of textile enterprises must be severely tightened, and the emission standards of nanoflakes should be improved. 
2012) the following changes have been made: first, increase the emission requirements, tighten the emission limits of chemical oxygen demand, five day biochemical oxygen demand, suspended solids and ammonia nitrogen; two, control the emission of harmful substances, and tighten the emission limits of sulphides, aniline, six valent chromium and chlorine dioxide; two, aniline and six valence chromium will not be detected since January 1, 2015; three are additional organic halogen (AOX) indicators to enhance the control of toxic and harmful pollutants; four, add total nitrogen and total phosphorus indicators to strengthen the control of eutrophication and meet the environmental management needs; five is to set the unit product baseline drainage, prevent dilution discharge, and promote enterprises to save water. new standard "discharge standard for water pollutants in textile dyeing and finishing industry" compared with the old standard (GB 4287) 
 especially noteworthy is that the new standard abolished the emission standards of grade II and III of pollutants in the old standards and replaced the direct and indirect emission standards, thereby greatly raising the discharge standard requirements, especially the standard requirements for the enterprise's emission control. {page_break} 
 many have not yet fully implemented the new standard .
 enterprises exceeded the standard discharge situation is serious, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shandong 3 provinces have not fully implemented < a > New Standard < /a > /strong > /p >
 however, environmental protection organizations have found that new standards have not yet been fully implemented in many parts of the country. In the 5 provinces, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Fujian and Shandong, which are highly concentrated in the dyeing and finishing industry, only two provinces in Zhejiang and Fujian have implemented the new standards more strictly, and 3 provinces in Guangdong, Jiangsu and Shandong have not completely implemented the new standards. 
 at the same time, the emission limits shown by the supervisory monitoring information in Fujian and Shandong are inconsistent with the emission limits shown on line monitoring. Only in Zhejiang Province, the data of enterprises violating the new standards are more fully disclosed. 
 in the third phase of the textile industry research report, we focused on the situation of Zhejiang province. According to Zhejiang's quarterly report on key pollution sources in 2013, textile enterprises violated the new emission standards in a large scale. 
 May 15, 2013, the Zhejiang provincial Environmental Protection Office website released the "first quarter of 2013, Zhejiang key pollution source monitoring report" shows that the Zhejiang province carries out the supervisory supervision of the provincial control (including state control) industrial waste water pollution of 1089 key sources, 423 of the existence of excessive discharge situation. The reason for the high rate of exceeding the standard is that textile enterprises exceed the standard in a large scale. The number of textile enterprises exceeding the standard is 391, accounting for 92.4% of the total number of enterprises in the province. 
The number of textile enterprises exceeding P in the second quarter exceeded 419, accounting for 93.7% of the total number of enterprises in the province. 
 the textile industry survey report shows that the textile printing and dyeing enterprises in some new standards have already seen a large scale emission exceeding standard, and the number of enterprises exceeding standard has been increasing. At the same time, according to the new standard requirements, the existing enterprises will also implement the second stage limit requirement from January 1, 2015. 
At P, the emission requirements of some pollutant indicators will be further improved. If enterprises fail to prepare ahead of schedule, the phenomenon of exceeding the standard may become more serious. 
 < a > href= > http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp > dyeing sludge > /a > big problem > /strong > /p >
 the phenomenon of printing and dyeing sludge being dumped to farmland and water and soil at random is frequent. 
 with the improvement of printing and dyeing wastewater treatment requirements, the amount of printing and dyeing sludge will also increase significantly. Enterprises should pay attention to this problem. Xu Panshi, director of environmental protection service center of Chao Lu, said. 
 at present, the printing and dyeing wastewater treatment is basically combined with physicochemical and biochemical methods. Activated sludge process is widely used, but it produces a large number of excess sludge. After the implementation of the new standard, the COD concentration of the effluent from the printing and dyeing enterprises decreased from 1000mg/L to 200mg/L. After the standards were raised, the amount of sludge produced after sewage treatment also increased. 
 Shaoxing county has more than 200 printing and dyeing enterprises, producing about 2100 tons of printing and dyeing sludge every day. There are also 50 printing and dyeing enterprises above Designated Size in Shaoxing City, producing about 400 tons of sludge every day. With the addition of the two, the total volume of sludge produced by printing and dyeing enterprises in Shaoxing county and urban area is as high as 2500 tons per day. However, at present, only the specialized recycling company of Shaoxing in central Shaoxing has handled the sludge disposal in the urban area of the city of Shaoxing. The sludge disposal project of Shaoxing county has not yet been operated. 
 sludge disposal capacity is obviously insufficient, and the disposal system of printing and dyeing sludge is not standardized, resulting in the frequent dumping of printing and dyeing sludge to farmland and water and soil. 
 Shaoxing City Environmental Protection Bureau's monitoring station personnel said, "at present, Shaoxing's random dumping of printing and dyeing sludge, there are many heavy metals exceeding the standard, including lead, mercury, chromium and so on." The environmental protection public service center of Chao Lu revealed that the heavy metals in the sludge exceeded the standard by sampling the third party laboratory. 
Fang Yingjun, director of green Jiangnan, said: "the pollution of textile and dyeing industry has restricted the sustainable development of some developed coastal areas. It is particularly important to promote cleaner production of the brand industrial chain and promote green selection." P 
 facing the challenge of supply chain < a href= > http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp > violation exceeding standard < /a > /strong > /p >
 strong > how does the big brand react? 
 China Environmental News intern reporter Liu Xiaoyi Beijing reported that in the third phase of the green selection Textile Research Report issued by the public environmental research center (IPE) recently, the reporter saw that the printing and dyeing industry had a huge discharge, which brought heavy pressure to the environment of the concentrated area of the industry, and required strict implementation of emission standards and environmental impact. 
 however, a large number of printing and dyeing enterprises have not yet been prepared for the implementation of the new standards, so that in the areas where the new standards are being implemented, the textile printing and dyeing enterprises have a large area exceeding the standard. This also means that there is a major environmental violation risk in the supply chain of textile brands. 
 to evaluate the extent of the promotion of the environmental performance of the brands in the textile industry, and promote the brand to carry out more extensive and substantive environmental information disclosure. < a > IPE < /a > joint NRDC, the 48 "home textile environmental information disclosure index CITI" is evaluated, aiming at promoting the enterprises to make use of the already disclosed environmental information to screen the irregularities preliminarily. The lack of transparency of brand enterprises can not prove the effectiveness of environmental protection, nor can it carry out substantive communication with stakeholders. 
 in the face of challenges, Yida, < a > Puma < /a > H&M, Nike, Adidas, WAL-MART, Levi "s", "Gap,", ",", ",", ",", "and" and so on. Some brands have already started using public data to establish supplier search mechanism, so that they can identify pollution problems in the supply chain actively, and urge some suppliers to make rectification. 
Through the investigation, a number of NGO organizations of the P green selection alliance began to talk with 49 Chinese and foreign clothing brands in April 2012, asking if they knew the environmental performance of the supply chain including dyeing and finishing suppliers. Since then, 30 companies have communicated with NGO. In order to understand the brand's environmental management of dyeing and finishing suppliers, the green choice alliance NGO group wrote to 49 brand companies again in September 25, 2012, hoping to explain the management of material suppliers. As of October 16, 2013, a total of 33 enterprises responded. 
 in the more than 30 brands, some brands responded positively to the call of NGO to improve the environmental management of their supply chain. Among them, H&M, Nike, Esquel (overflow), Levi 's, Gap, Adidas, Reebok and Burberry performed well, and the suppliers were searched regularly through the pollution map, including some main material suppliers. Zara has begun using pollution maps to conduct preliminary searches on its supply chain, including some major material suppliers. It is worth mentioning that WAL-MART not only regularly compares its suppliers, but also promotes suppliers, including some major material suppliers, to make public descriptions of illegal records. 
 faced with the challenge of exceeding the standard of supply chain violation, some brands also showed negative performance. There are many famous brands that do not reply or refuse to face pollution queries. They have always been high-profile, environment-friendly and popular brands such as Polo Ralph Lauren, Uniqlo, Tommy Hilfiger, Calvin Klein, Target, YOUNGOR and so on. 
In November 25, 2013 P, the green choice alliance NGO launched a dialogue with two other Chinese and foreign clothing brands (Hugo Boss and a href= http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp) to find out whether they understood the environmental performance of the supply chain including dyeing and finishing suppliers. As of January 12, 2014, they had not yet received the reply from the two brands. 
 > a > uniqu < /a > /strong > /p >
In December 9, 2013, P conducted a telephone conversation with the public environmental research center of Uniqlo, Japan, to learn about the survey and ask the green choice supply chain management system in detail. UNIQLO said it attaches great importance to the problems raised by China's environmental protection organizations and will follow up after the study. 
 > a > YOUNGOR < /a > /strong > /p >
After the release of the P December 4, 2013 report, in December 5th, the YOUNGOR group Limited by Share Ltd and the environmental protection organization conducted a preliminary communication. After that, face-to-face communication was conducted, and the YOUNGOR statement on the Research Report of the public environment research center was provided. Some of the suspected suppliers of YOUNGOR were mentioned in the Textile Research Report. 
 then, YOUNGOR group coordination subsidiary Ningbo YOUNGOR Sino Japan Textile printing and dyeing Co., Ltd. and Shengzhou Sheng Tai dyed Weaving Technology Co., Ltd. reply and explain the pollution problem.