As Management, Do You Want Loyalty Or Development?

< p > in fact, the more the "obedient" people in the enterprise, the slower the development of the enterprise, the lower efficiency of execution or the high cost of management. But the managers are intoxicated in the false prosperity and are not willing to introspection, and their enterprises can not get healthy development. In the end, the development of the enterprises is hard or they can not do much for decades.

< /p >

< p > < strong > 1, business consciousness < /strong > /p >

< p > the fool has a friend who is doing a very special business.

Last year, I worked with some friends in partnership.

The business model at that time was like this: the project manager needs to be stationed in the store, and then the project manager needs to operate separately on the specific circumstances of each project (which is a little out of line with the company management), because basically a project manager corresponds to a project, so the requirements for the project manager are very high, and the ability is not only comprehensive, but also very loyal, and there will be no way to throw the project aside in such a way. In fact, because of the inherent defects of this business mode, in the last year, the project manager has run away halfway, or the project manager has gone through a lot of cases in the process of execution.

< /p >

< p > for example, last year, a project manager came to the store, because his personal experience and individualism made it impossible for the customer to start his business. In the whole process, the project manager did not communicate with the company healthfully and make progress reports, so that the company suffered huge reputation losses and economic losses.

< /p >

After P's appearance, these friends think that this is not enough loyalty or ability of the project manager. They have been lamenting that they can't find a good person. Then, because there are so many things in the process of operation, several people in the partnership are frustrated. Finally, everyone is disbanded. Almost all the project managers have left.

Friends have to continue to work with others this year.

< /p >

< p > < strong > two, specific case < /strong > < /p >.

< p > when the project manager left, almost all the project managers left.

An exception to XX is that friends have been taking the business from the very beginning, with poor ability, and very wordy, but friends think this person is loyal.

< /p >

< p > one day, the company is responsible for the business to pick up things and prepare for a business trip.

It's going to go down to a certain project, and it's going to open soon, and we need to prepare for the past. When the accountant suddenly ran over, XX said that he was ready to go there, so that I could help the * *, he and I would wonder why he was going to go there. This is not a good idea. Every time I went there, I could only have one person. There must be a communication problem there. Then I called my friend and asked if my friend sent XX to go down, and my friend said no.

Then a certain accountant told XX not to go.

And so on.

< /p >

< p > we can see from this instance that XX decided to go to the project when the company was completely unaware of it. Last year, there were so many losses and accidents because the project manager was independently responsible for the unscientific and non management mechanism of a project.

XX's practice is still taking the road of last year and the lack of connection with the company, so that the company can increase the extra management cost and make the management mechanism of the company become empty. It will further cause the project accident last year and make it impossible for the project owner to start business.

From the management point of view, this person does not have the sense of "organization management" in his mind.

Doing things entirely depends on personal experience, pointing out where to fight, rather than first considering the systematic arrangement of "organization".

He only wants to deal with "project" or "thing" without thinking about "organization management cost" and "how to deal with it better?" < /p >

< p > if the accountant fails to speak out these situations in time, it will cause several people to go to a certain store, and then he will continue to appear or he or a store manager has to go home halfway because of personal reasons, so that the executive power of the company is extremely low and the development efficiency is extremely low.

< /p >

< p > < strong > three, contradiction? < /strong > < /p >

< p > in fact, this XX can not be said to be active and loyal.

However, it is because of this "positive" and "loyalty" that it makes the development of enterprises slow, and big events do not commit minor incidents.

The fool has seen with his own eyes that a friend's company has asked for a financial account to do dozens of bills, which can be done in a EXL. He has to store a watch to do it. It could have been done for a week in a week.

There is also the information inside the computer. After that, every time the financial information is done, it is placed here a little bit, where every time you need information, you can find everywhere. You can't find and do it again. You can clearly put the data of the same type together and put it together. When you need it, you can find it in a short time, and you will make these things very complicated. There are many examples like this.

< /p >

< p > friends say the employee is loyal.

Follow him all the time, there is no complaints, no salary increases, and yes, we respect this kind of staff.

However, from the above examples, it seems that the friend's work efficiency is not high, but rather a waste of resources, friends themselves also said that many times they had to wait for two or three days, /p, for financial information.

< p > Yes, it is true that all enterprises want their employees to be loyal, but similar to the above mentioned "loyalty", which is interesting? Not only do they do bad things, but they will make things more complicated and artificially increase the cost of management costs of the company, so that the development efficiency of the company is extremely low. Therefore, it is reasonable for the company to develop slowly or not.

< /p >

< p > fool thinks: this kind of work is inefficient, and the "fidelity" of personal empiricism is hypocritical.

It looks good, but it really hurts the company.

< /p >

< p > this creates a contradiction.

We are looking for this kind of loyal "obedient" person in the company, we say no objection, or find some know how to do things better, highly efficient, but there are not so "obedient", have their own thoughts of people. To find the front type of people, we can hear every day "pleasant words", we can enjoy the reverence of the crowd, we can be very uncomfortable, because some people oppose our old practices, oppose our style of work, but the company will therefore get rapid development, "/p".