Hebei Responds To Judges' Irregular Dressing Practices: Procedures And Entities Are Legal

on

Province Wuyi County Court judge in different locations law enforcement was exposed "wearing vest shorts law enforcement, suspected fraud is controlled by the police", Wuyi County People's Court of Hebei province responded 5, said the 3 judges of the hospital to Chengdu execution case, to assist the investigation obligation but refused to assist the Shu Jia company fines behavior, in the procedures and entities are consistent with the law.

According to media reports, at the end of July this year, 3 judges from Wuyi County Court of Hebei province went to Chengdu to carry out a civil case. A judge was wearing vest shorts, causing the parties to question their identity.

Several judges believe that a property company that has no connection with the case "refused to cooperate with the court investigation" has frozen the account of the company, fined 300 thousand yuan, and then haggled over the amount of the fine.

The police questioned the identities of these judges.

。

Once the media was released, it aroused great concern from all walks of life.

Wuyi court fines the property company that fails to fulfill its obligation to assist.

According to Liu Wenlong, head of discipline inspection of Wuyi County People's court, the court made (2013) Wu Zhao Min's first sentence No. 451st in December 25, 2013, and the sentence was: Tang Yong returned Meng Yadong and Meng Xianwen prepaid 1 million 130 thousand yuan for processing contract, five days after the decision came into effect.

In June 2014, 16 Japanese Academy accepted the case of Meng Xianwen and Meng Yadong applying for the execution of Tang Yong's contract for processing contract.

Because the executor Tang Yong has more than three properties outside the jurisdiction of the province and belongs to different places, it was approved by the Hengshui intermediate people's court in the 17 daily of June 2014, and the 19 daily in June 2014 was approved by the Hebei Provincial Higher People's court to go elsewhere in Chengdu.

Jin Aimin, executive director of Wuyi court, Zhang Baodong, President of the two tribunal of the Executive Court, Zhang Baodong, vice captain of the bailiff team and Gao Yong, four of his technical assistant room director, arrived in Chengdu on July 20, 2014 and arrived at the population Hotel on the same day.

In July 21, 2014, the police officers of the hospital investigated the situation of the shops under the name of Tang Yong, who had been seized, and asked the office staff of the premises of the shop that the building belonged to Chengdu Shu Jia Property Management Co., Ltd.

Liu Wenlong said that the police officers of the hospital immediately went to Shu Jia company to investigate the name of Tang Yong, the executor.

Situation.

In the process of investigation and evidence collection, Shu Jia company, as a manager, is obliged to cooperate with the court to investigate. Its repeated refusal to cooperate with the investigation seriously impedes the implementation of the work. The Joint Executive of the police office of Wuyi court considers that it is proposed to impose a fine of 300 thousand yuan on Shu Jia company.

On the morning of July 28th, Zhang Baodong and Gao Yong, a court official from Wuyi, served a fine decision on the property company and seized the deposit account of the property company 300 thousand yuan (the balance was 220 thousand yuan at that time).

In the afternoon, the company's legal counsel Xiao lawyer called Zhang Baodong, who handled the case, agreed to cooperate with the court investigation, admitted that his staff did not cooperate with the court investigation wrongful act, asked the court to reduce the company's fine.

Xiao lawyer went to the property company with Zhang Baodong, Gao Yong, the court officer of Wuyi City, and found out the relationship between the shop owner of Tang Yong and the Sichuan hehe Cci Capital Ltd.

After conducting a joint hearing, the executive officers believed that Shu Jia's property had a good attitude of admitting a fault and coordinated with the relevant investigation. After the approval of Comrade Jin Aimin, the executive director, the penalty amount was reduced to thirty thousand yuan.

The judge was beaten in the process of handling the case and was controlled by the Chengdu police.

　　據武邑縣人民法院紀檢組長劉文龍介紹，該法院在執行對蜀佳公司三萬元罰款過程中，安排一名干警清點現金，一名干警做交款筆錄(以上有成都市電視臺提供的視頻資料證實)，當武邑法院干警要求蜀佳公司在筆錄上簽字時突然出現一群身份不明人員，在沒有出示任何證件的情況下，使用手銬強行將武邑法院干警進行暴力控制，進行了搜身，扣押了搜查出的物品(后經賓館監控顯示，該物業公司人員、派出所干警及記者已在15時進入賓館布控)，對武邑法院干警在明示自身為法院干警的情況下進行毆打(有視頻為證)，并帶至成都市青羊區西御河派出所拘禁至次日凌晨一點。

The above actions resulted in the completion of the fines and the fines.

After that, the public security department did not make a qualitative test of thirty thousand yuan penalty, nor did it have a qualitative conclusion on the whole incident.

Jin Aimin, director of the Executive Office of Wuyi County People's court, said in an interview with China News Network reporter that in July 30th, the hospital sent its own and discipline inspection team leader Liu Wenlong to understand the situation of the West Yuhe police station in Qingyang District, Chengdu province. A money surnamed director took the media speculation as a request to lift the seizure of the Wuyi court. When we recorded video data, the instructor Yang Yong refused to make audio and video recording on the grounds of "inconvenient".

After closing the video, it said to our investigator, "the relationship is rather complicated, and the media is very hyped. You have to give us a lift to Shu Jia property company."