What Is The Difference Between Salesperson Training And Training?

　　 One Train Is to achieve cognitive change, training is to achieve behavioral change.

From the point of view, the purpose of training is to achieve cognitive change. Students from "I don't know" to "I know" is a process of Know what. The purpose of training is to achieve behavioral change. Students from "I will not do" to "I will do" is a process of Know how. Moreover, effective training methods not only enable students to master skills in class, but also ensure that students will apply their behaviors to the classroom and form daily work habits after class. Only in this way can real behavior change, habit change and result change be realized.

　　 2. emphasis on training Passing knowledge Training focuses on mastering skills.

From the content point of view, training is mainly a process for lecturers to deliver knowledge to students. After participating in training, students have a deeper and more systematic understanding and understanding of theoretical knowledge, but how to apply them depends on their digestion after training. And training is focused on mastering skills, just like learning swimming. If only training some swimming principles, knowledge of swimming, matters needing attention in swimming, and lecturers' demonstrations of swimming to students, etc., students will still learn not to swim. Only coaches and trainees will personally take part in the test and practice, and through training plans, training courses and training methods, and gradually increase the training difficulty, students can truly master the skill of swimming.

At the same time, training in class is about the established environment which is not interfered by external environment, but the real world is sudden change. Swimming in a small swimming pool is not equal to swimming in the rough sea and even the stormy sea. Training is to solve the problem of stabilizing the skill and tactics of the students in different actual situations.

　　 3. training focuses on teaching and learning. train Focus on practice and use

In formal terms, the difference between training and training is that the focus of training is on teaching and learning, training instructors to export knowledge and methods, training trainees to learn knowledge and methods, and focusing on training and implementation. Training is designed by trainers, and the skills and methods are integrated into various training modes. Then coaches and trainees practice and use skills and methods repeatedly. In this process, coaches are able to rectify the methods used by trainees and strengthen their skills, until the trainees really master this skill. In training, lecturers are the protagonists and trainees are supporting roles, because lecturers are the exporters of knowledge and methods. Therefore, the effect of training is good or not, to a large extent, depends on the level of lecturers. In training, students are the leading role and coaches are supporting roles, because trainees are masters of skills and methods. Therefore, the training effect is good or not, to a large extent, depends on the design of training plans, training courses, training methods, training intensity and training difficulty.

　　 4. training output students, training output fighters

From the result, the training output is students, while the training outputs are soldiers. There are always two kinds of soldiers in the army. One is fighting, and the other is preparing for battle. The process of training is to prepare for the coming battle. If soldiers are not trained to be on the battlefield, then the consequences must be the surrender of life to the other side. Athletes will always have only two states. One is playing games and one is preparing for competitions. The process of training is to meet the coming games. If athletes are not trained, they will be handed over to the opponent. Only by training can we truly forge "soldiers" who are ready to fight, rather than "students" who only know theoretical knowledge but do not know actual combat. Student students, in front of the real battle complex scenes, are trained for everything because they are not trained by real weapons.

"Training" and "training" are not as good as they are, but because of different purposes, different contents and different forms, which affect the results. In the actual teaching process, different teaching methods should be adopted according to different teaching aims and teaching objects. For example, for the marketing field of the company, the marketing actual combat effort is hard to fight, dare to fight, and hard to fight. Simple training has been increasingly unable to meet the needs of enterprises. Because the marketing department of an enterprise is the only profit center of the enterprise, the competition in the marketing battlefield is the contest between the real and real guns between the enterprise and the enterprise, and the purpose of marketing training is to enhance the business performance of the enterprise. Therefore, simple knowledge transfer, method transfer, skill transfer, and simple realization of students' cognitive changes can not directly affect the improvement of business performance of enterprises, which is why the effect of marketing training is difficult to quantify. Only by transforming marketing training into marketing training can we really promote the business performance of enterprises.