Workplace Persuasion Requires Both Sense And Reason.

　　 Persuade The other side should be sensible and reasonable. First, you can start feeling emotionally, shorten the gap between yourself and the other side, and let the other person feel that you have the same feelings with him. On this basis, you can analyze the interests and achieve the desired results.

Secondly, it is the interests of the weak, the so-called "two benefits and the right from the heavy, the two harm from the right to light". benefit It is human nature, so we should conform to human nature and strive for gains and losses, so as to improve the power of persuasion.

You can also use personal experience or experience as an example, with proper expression, serious and serious, relaxed and relaxed, with the personal feelings of the lobbyist. experience Or learn to convince each other. The key is that the expression should be very real, like the way you experience yourself. The greatest advantage of this method is to increase the credibility of persuasion and make you feel reliable.

The big reason for persuasion is not to look at the true situation of the incident. Successful persuasions should focus on the characteristics of the matter and the reception ability of the other side. If the other party's cultural accomplishment is high, the language should be refined; if the logic is strong, the degree of theory is higher; if the other party's cultural quality is not high, then the language should be used more vulgar and more vivid examples. It is a thought-provoking and powerful skill to put forward the appropriate metaphor and convince others through analogy. The above methods help to accept each other, narrow the distance and improve the atmosphere of communication.

According to psychologists, to persuade each other, the length of speech is also affected. If a speech can be completed within forty-five seconds, it is easier for the other person to understand, and the longest should not exceed one and a half minutes. Beyond this limit, listeners begin to feel lengthy, and if more than two minutes, no matter what the listener or speaker is, it will be difficult to understand.

We can also use aggressive methods to persuade the other side, and there are two common forms of aggression.

1. the Ming Chi method is to irritate the other side with a straight line of disgrace, humiliation and fastidious, as if a cold dish poured down to make the spirit of the other side vibrate.

2. dark stimulation: this method is to indirectly belittle each other by praising or praising others or other things.

Related links:

Have you ever thought about this problem? Are you willing to work hard for the sake of your boss or company? Different object setting will make your work attitude and position different. Understanding these psychological problems and understanding the core values and key stakeholders can help you understand the real meaning of work and accurately grasp the direction of the workplace.

According to survey statistics, in the current social work field, about 70 to 80% of people have job hopping experience, and only 20% of these people quit because of their superiors. That is to say, more than half of the workers in the workplace can not tolerate their superiors, and can not continue to work with them, or even have to choose their own jobs. Why is there such a situation?

According to workplace experts, this is mostly due to the "excessive expectation" of employees on their superiors. Think about it, do you often feel that your boss is stupid? So what do you think of your boss's eyes? What do you think of your existence in your boss's eyes? Do you think if you are regarded as "stupid" by your subordinates as a boss, do you think such a subordinate is also stupid? If this situation continues, what do you think is good for you?

At this point, we can go back to the questions raised in this article: who are you working for, your boss or your company?

The answer to this question is entirely different from that of the senior professionals and newcomers. The new employee thinks that a qualified employee should serve the company, while the senior thinks that the employee should better serve the boss. Is this the embodiment of the more worldly human being in the workplace? In fact, this problem can not rise to human nature and morality.