Stock Index Futures Go Up And Go Down, Big Market Counter Attack Countdown

The news of the reduction has excited everyone, but today the market is going up and down, but it seems to have poured cold water on everyone.

Many friends asked, "is it not a great advantage to drop the quota?" today, instead of falling, does it mean that the market is weaker?

In fact, such a tossing is a good thing. If we are to go higher and lower, we can further shake the will of not steadfast chips and make the chips fully exchanged. Moreover, we will make up for the gap of the upward gap in February 3rd, and it will become more solid in the future.

We have always emphasized a concept that the stock market has its own operational rules, and news will only impact on the short-term trend, but it can not change the operation rules of the stock market.

In the upward trend, bad news will only bring short-term adjustment, and the stock index will soon resume the upward trend. In the downtrend, the good news is only a rebound, and it can not reverse the downtrend.

Recently, repeatedly stressed that the stock index as a whole is

Halfway range concussion, and from the amount of energy, amplitude, and show that the adjustment has reached the middle and later period, the adjustment time has also reached 22 trading days, and the average concussion time in the bull market in 06 or 07 years is 33 trading days, at least 17 trading days.

Meanwhile, there are some interesting signs of small cap stocks:

Exponent sum

The index is about to form a 60 minute MACD deviation. Once formed, it means that it takes some time to digest, especially the gem.

By then, will the wind of the market be relocated to the large cap stocks? Let's wait and see.

Related links:

Xu Xiubai, member of the Jiangxi provincial CPPCC member, shelled the rigid employment system of some monopolized state owned enterprises in Jiangxi province. On the one hand, the state-owned enterprises became family businesses. The idea of "fighting the rivers and mountains, taking the rivers and mountains and spreading children and grandchildren" was imperceptibly imprinted on some employees' minds from the planned economy.

On the other hand, some state owned front-line employees have high salaries but do not work.

This phenomenon shows that the income of state-owned enterprises is far more than that of risk. For these employees, the status of employees of state-owned enterprises is equivalent to that of farmers who have a contracted land and are guaranteed for life.

This phenomenon shows that the internal employment mechanism and salary mechanism of these enterprises are extremely rigid, and the employees are paid according to their status rather than the contribution of their employees. Of course, the enterprises that can afford to have migrant workers have a monopoly position, which is enough to afford the wages of idle employees, and can also afford a large number of temporary workers.

On the surface, state-owned enterprises have abolished the hereditary system of employment. Since October 1, 1986, the state stipulates that the recruitment of workers by state-owned enterprises must adopt a labor contract system and abolish the replacement of children.

At that time, even under the specific background, even the civil servants were going to sea. The local small state-owned enterprises were pushed to the market. China's economy is still in the stage of insufficient capacity. The income of a small stall is higher than that of the local state-owned enterprises. Therefore, the reform of abolishing the children's replacement is advancing smoothly.

In recent years, the situation has changed. China's economy has shifted from insufficient capacity to overcapacity, and the threshold for entrepreneurship has risen, and the risk has increased.

As the reform is not in place, there is a difference between the inside and outside of the system, the ability of large state-owned enterprises to acquire cheap resources is rising, and the hidden benefits of employees, especially managers, have risen, which is reflected in various aspects such as welfare housing, provident fund and so on.

At present, the hereditary system, family system and eight banners of state-owned enterprises are the result of the incomplete reform of state-owned enterprises and the inevitable result of unfair status of enterprises in and outside the system.

The degree of adhesion of state-owned enterprises to family employees is inversely proportional to the fairness of the market.