• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Australia Is Strongly Opposed To Taxes On Cross-Border Online Shopping Orders Below US $1000.

    2015/2/28 15:19:00 46

    AustraliaCross Border Online ShoppingRetailers

    All the time,

    Australia

    The goods and services tax (GST) is only imposed on cross-border online shopping orders valued at more than US $1000, but less than $1000 can be waived.

    However, cross-border online shopping has become a common practice in Australia in recent years, leading to the continuous flow of revenue from local retailers to foreign Internet retailers.


    Australian local retailers have also asked for a tax on cross-border online shopping orders less than US $1000.

    However, industry insiders say the move does not encourage Australians to turn around and buy local products, because the price advantage of overseas goods after tax is still very strong.

    On the contrary, this will only lead to price increases, increase consumer spending, and bring greater burden to ordinary families.

    In recent reports, it is understood that: under 1000 dollars

    Cross border online shopping

    Order taxation is bad for consumers because they have to pay higher prices when shopping from overseas websites.

    These products include books, cameras, perfume, electric sword (Star Wars) and so on, but even if the consumption tax is levied, the prices of these products are still cheaper than those of Australian domestic retailers.

    In the summer of 2014, the Abbott administration proposed a levy on goods and services, which should be included in the new tax measures that might be adopted.

    The chancellor of the exchequer, Joe Hockey, will announce the consequences of tax discussions recently.

    However, the senior adviser of Institute of Public Affairs strongly opposed the tax reform of the government. He believed that the government should not adopt the method of broadening the tax base.

    Tax relief should be continued for cross-border online shopping orders below US $1000.

    Dr Novak, of the Australian Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), said: "this new tax reform proposal is useless for restricting the advantages of cross-border online shopping.

    Even abolishing tariff free measures, from overseas

    Retailer

    It is cheaper to buy products than Australian retail stores. "

    According to the IPA survey, a "Fred Hopdide Down" brand beer bottle is priced at $29.95 in Australian retail stores, and even from the overseas website, the price is still $15.47 even after the goods and services tax is charged.

    For example, Nikon Coolpix P600 digital camera sells for up to 508 US dollars in Australian retail stores, while the purchase price from overseas websites plus GST after tax is only $399, and the spread is still very large, up to 108 US dollars.

    For example, the purchase of the missing girl from the Australian bookstore Dymocks is priced at $25.98, but the purchase from overseas website "bookdepository.com" is only $13.94.

    If the book is taxed, the price will only rise from $13.94 to $15.33, which is still 41% lower than the Dymocks price. This price advantage is still very obvious.

    Therefore, taxation is useless. It will only be harmful to consumers and increase consumer spending.

    Moreover, taxation is not easy to implement. The tax cost of expanding the tax base of goods and services tax will be higher than that of the tax itself, which will do more harm than good.

    The survey conducted by the The Productivity Commission In 2010-2011 years has found that the threshold for the taxation of low value products will be reduced to $100, although it can bring 495 million dollars in taxes to the government. At the same time, it also allows the government to pay 1 billion 200 million dollars for tax purposes, which is much higher than the cost.

    Through the survey, it is easy to find that expanding the tax base will only increase the cost of living for Australian consumers, without any other advantages.

    IPA believes that the government should reduce the high labor costs of Australian local retailers by solving the problem of fines interest rates and the reform of labour relations.

    Reducing costs and improving the price competitiveness of local retailers is the correct solution.

    If the government really wants to help local retailers, it should liberate the market and exclude the protective proposals against consumers.

    Opponents of the proposal argue that the taxation of overseas online shopping products under US $1000 is also a trade protectionism act. Expanding the tax base is not a real reform.

    25% of Australia's online shopping products come from overseas websites.

    Australian retailers believe that the exemption of GST from overseas Internet retailers is unfair to taxpayers, domestic retailers and retail practitioners. This situation poses great harm to the local retail industry. Australian states should take measures to change this situation, because it can bring more revenue to the States.

    The organisation for economic co operation and development (OECD) also urges the Australian government to expand the tax base or impose a goods and services tax.

    OECD even said that even a 10% tax rate would be lower than international standards.

    However, the Australian finance minister refused to comment on the matter and said OECD did not understand the overall economic situation of Australia.

    Australian consumers do not buy OECD accounts.

    Australian consumers believe that if the government wants to levy 10% of the goods and services tax, other corresponding tax reduction measures should be introduced to compensate the middle and low income families, because many families are facing a lot of pressure of expenditure.

    If the government wants to raise taxes, please let the Australians vote.

    Australian Mr Hockey said: "the problem now is not just increasing the goods and services tax, but also what the Australian can get from it.

    If we do not get personal income tax cuts, corporate tax cuts or other benefits, then it is not worth it. "

    • Related reading

    China And Asia Textile Forum Examine Industrial Regional Positioning

    international standard
    |
    2015/2/28 15:15:00
    27

    Today's International Report: India Considers Reducing The Consumption Tax On Leather Shoes.

    international standard
    |
    2015/2/27 11:08:00
    37

    Textile Products In Australia Should Be Strictly Protected Against Azo Dyes.

    international standard
    |
    2015/2/12 14:35:00
    24

    Incorporation Of Azo Dyes Into Harmful Substances Control In Household Products In Japan

    international standard
    |
    2015/2/6 12:21:00
    44

    Columbia Shoe Industry Regrets Ecuador'S Import Tariff Increase.

    international standard
    |
    2015/2/2 19:25:00
    32
    Read the next article

    5個(gè)大家最想解決的彩妝問題

    漸變的咬唇妝最近一直很流行,很多女生都在苦惱到底什么順序才對(duì),容易脫妝怎么解決,下面就為大家一一講解。

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 又大又硬又爽免费视频| 成人亚洲欧美日韩在线观看| 国产欧美日韩不卡在线播放在线| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色在线婷婷| 99久久精品免费看国产| 波多野结衣99| 国内精品久久久久国产盗摄| 亚洲欧美日韩中另类在线| 57pao国产成视频免费播放| 欧美性猛交ⅹxxx乱大交禽| 国产精品特级露脸AV毛片| 亚洲国产成人手机在线电影bd| 在线看片你懂的| 最近2019mv中文字幕免费看| 国产大片91精品免费观看男同| 久久强奷乱码老熟女| 色综合久久中文字幕网| 我和岳乱妇三级高清电影| 冈本视频老版app下载安装进入口 再一深点灬舒服灬太大了视频 | 一区二区精品久久| 真实国产老熟女粗口对白| 大乳丰满人妻中文字幕日本| 亚洲欧美成人永久第一网站| 亚洲欧美另类中文字幕| 日本韩国三级在线| 啦啦啦资源在线观看视频 | 黄页网站免费在线观看| 日本免费无遮挡吸乳视频电影| 四虎影视永久地址www成人 | 日韩加勒比在线| 成人毛片18女人毛片免费| 全免费a级毛片免费**视频| 99视频免费在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区三区在线视频 | 中文japanese在线播放| 男人扒开女人的腿做爽爽视频| 国产超碰人人模人人爽人人喊 | 中文字幕在线日韩| 男人把女人桶爽30分钟动态| 国产精品黄页免费高清在线观看 | 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕 |