• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    We Cannot Allow The Market Of Evil News To Harm The Market.

    2015/5/22 20:44:00 14

    False NewsRights ProtectionDisaster Market

    In a sense, the stock market is an "information market". Information has a self-evident effect on the ups and downs of stocks and the market.

    Recently, there have been several heavy news circulated in the market. Since then, they have been proved to be false news, but these false news have played a role in promoting or helping the stock price of related stocks or sectors.

    I believe that as a regulator of the market, the SFC can not allow the market of evil news to cause harm.

    A false news of the securities and Futures Commission's fund company has led to a big fluctuation in the gem index on the 13 th day of ~15, until the resumption of "vigour" on Monday. Last week, the sharp rise in Zhongguancun was interpreted as the false news of "Wong Kwong Yu will be released early".

    Even false news can affect the rise and fall of stocks, highlighting the sensitivity and importance of market to news.

    In fact, fabricating and disseminating false information to disrupt the securities market is a violation of the law. However, there is a suspicion of manipulating the market by issuing or disseminating false information affecting the price of the securities.

    The seventy-seventh provision of the current securities law prohibits any person from "alone or through collusion, concentrating the advantages of capital, holding the advantage or using information advantage to jointly or continuously trade, manipulating the price of securities trading or the volume of securities trading", or "manipulating the stock market by other means."

    According to the regulation issued by the Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) on the identification of the manipulation of securities market (Trial Implementation), it is alleged that the influence of false news on the price of securities is related to the manipulation of confusing pactions.

    Therefore, it is proper to punish them severely.

    There is a lot of false news in the market, and there are many people who have ulterior motives.

    As for the false news that Wong Kwong Yu will be released early, as long as Gome and Zhongguancun's major shareholders do not reduce their holdings, at least for the time being, they are not beneficiaries.

    Total market capitalization

    Get promoted.

    The real benefit recipients are those who are buying large amounts of stocks at a low price, and then wait for the announcement to help the stock price rise to a high level.

    In fact, it has the impulse to disseminate false news.

    A shares are both a true and false market, and also a market.

    True and false news

    A mixed market.

    If some of the listed companies' high delivery and pfer schemes have not been officially disclosed before, stock carriers and other carriers will have relevant news in advance, and afterwards, they will be confirmed to be true news.

    But there are also some messages that are proved to be fictitious after being passed away in the market.

    And the market full of real and false news often leaves investors at a loss.

    Out of

    Standard

    The regulatory authorities have also issued relevant rules and regulations, but the effect is not satisfactory.

    Obviously, it is not easy to effectively supervise the frequent false news.

    First, there are a lot of false news on the market every year, almost to the extent that it is impossible to prevent; two, the cost of investigation is very high, which requires a lot of manpower, material and financial resources, and the supervision department will feel more than enough.

    There is no doubt that the false news not only trampled the "three principles" of the securities market, but also often led to the loss of small investors at the end of the information chain.

    Therefore, on the basis of the investigation and evidence collection, the SFC should learn from the United States' heavy punishment, and protect the interests of the small and medium-sized investors.

    On the one hand, in view of the suspicion of manipulating the market by fabricating and disseminating false information, it is recommended to regulate illegal activities that manipulate the market.

    For those who profit from spreading false news, they confiscate their income and impose a penalty of one to five times.

    If the circumstances are serious, the criminal responsibility shall be borne if the criminal responsibility is borne.

    On the other hand, the supreme law can introduce judicial interpretations similar to the false statements of listed companies, so as to help investors protect their rights.

    Small investors are often victims of false news, but there is no way to safeguard their rights. This is obviously unfair.

    With relevant judicial interpretations, small and medium investors will have the right dimension, and the cost of violation will also be greatly increased.


    • Related reading

    The Bank Is Responsible For The Loss Of The Depositor'S Deposit.

    Consumer rights protection
    |
    2015/5/22 20:40:00
    30

    The Sea Is Easy To Return, And There Are No Reasons To Return.

    Consumer rights protection
    |
    2015/5/6 18:28:00
    50

    Shop No. 1 And Amazon "No Reason To Return" Limit Multi Sea Amoy To Replace The Blind Area

    Consumer rights protection
    |
    2015/5/4 14:37:00
    36

    Weihai City Commerce And Industry Bureau Sampling Clothing Commodities

    Consumer rights protection
    |
    2015/4/30 21:01:00
    31

    Hunan Bureau Of Industry And Commerce Sampling Footwear Commodities

    Consumer rights protection
    |
    2015/4/30 20:59:00
    37
    Read the next article

    新三板:盡快建立分級監管制度

    新三板作為全國股轉市場,是個高度包容的市場,隨著掛牌企業的不斷增加,監管難度也在不斷增大,企業的不斷快速擴容需要監管層面調整步伐,針對不同公司的不同形式,新三板需要實現制度上的差異化安排。

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 娇小性色xxxxx中文| 四虎影片国产精品8848| 出包王女第四季op| 亚洲午夜一区二区三区| 三级台湾电影在线| 中文字幕亚洲色图| 男操女视频免费| 日韩免费无砖专区2020狼| 在线视频网址免费播放| 国产亚洲Av综合人人澡精品| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕久久| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久菠萝蜜| 九九精品99久久久香蕉| 一个人看的www在线观看免费 | 最近2019免费中文字幕视频三 | 看全色黄大色黄大片视| 日韩亚洲欧美综合一区二区三区| 大胸校花被老头粗暴在线观看| 国产一级毛片高清视频完整版| 亚洲国产精品ⅴa在线观看| 一定要抓住电影在线观看完整版| 黄网站色视频免费看无下截| 欧美精品免费在线| 成人永久免费福利视频app| 国产成人亚洲精品无码av大片 | 国产精品热久久无码AV| 免费看又爽又黄禁片视频1000| 久久最近最新中文字幕大全| 91热视频在线| 精品一区二区三区免费视频| 日本人强jizz多人高清| 国产精品99久久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃| 一本色道久久综合亚洲精品高清| 99久久精品九九亚洲精品| 美女视频黄A视频全免费| 日韩欧国产精品一区综合无码| 国产精品久久久久久久| 亚洲精品自产拍在线观看| 一级国产a级a毛片无卡| 日本人强jizzjizz老|