Interpretation Of Administrative Measures For Travel Expenses Of Municipal Party And Government Organs And Public Institutions

The Guangzhou municipal government has promulgated the new regulation "the administrative measures for the travel expenses of the municipal Party and government organs and public institutions", which stipulates that "the civil servants below the rank of the government must not travel by plane", which has recently aroused heated discussion. The 19 reporters visited many civil servants, Jinan University professors and ordinary city residents.

In fact, sitting on a plane or not is still on the travel expenses. Under normal circumstances, ticket prices are much more expensive than bus tickets and train tickets. Guangzhou's civil servants below the level of science and technology are not allowed to fly by air, but they are afraid that they can not fill the pool of tolerance consumption. The new central and state agencies' travel expenses management regulations, which were introduced in 2014, clearly stipulate that "when traveling to various destinations, there are multiple means of transport to choose from, and on the premise of not affecting public duties and ensuring safety, business travelers should choose an economical and convenient means of transportation." The implication is that, on the premise of good weather and favourable circumstances, business travel is of course the first choice for a convenient and economical economy. However, due to factors such as time cost, traffic conditions and so on, it is impossible for public servants to travel by plane below the level of science and technology.

Whether or not a public official below the grade level should travel by plane should have two levels of basis: first, the objective conditions such as the distance between a business trip, the reality of transportation and the time cost. For example, travel destination is far away, and it takes more than ten hours to ride a train. Official business I am afraid there is no need to tangled up in rush hour.

Secondly, a fact that must be cleared is that sitting on a plane does not mean stepping on a noble journey. If the travel time is clear, it may be more realistic to buy some discount tickets ahead of schedule than the bullet trains. Taking the plane as a "high-level" enjoyment is difficult to justify by restricting some of the public officers on a business trip by air. If flying is really a "public enemy" of the brigade, then how much effect can we get from the prohibition of grass root elimination? travel on business One of the ways to travel is, what is the purpose of "one size fits all" in a big way?

It should be said that it is difficult to distinguish between sitting or flying by job level and being paranoid. Just imagine that an ordinary policeman in Guangzhou is catching up with criminals in the field. Is it necessary to ride a green train on the rails?

Tracing the source, or officialdom The old road, the old thought, and the officialdom size decide whether to take an airplane or to have a slightest consideration on the priorities of the official business. The travel expense classification and the standard are good policies. The higher rank civil servants enjoy better understanding in the standard range. But taking the plane as a "high treatment and high enjoyment" is a matter of sacrifice and execution. Perhaps, the supervisory departments should devote more effort to those who exceed the standard and exceed the specifications to enjoy the travel treatment. They always keep their eyes on the ordinary civil servants, and probably do not see the official world outside the plane.