Getting A Dog Bite Is Not A Work-Related Injury On The Way To Work.

It is also a case of injury on the way to work. Why can traffic accidents be identified as work-related injuries? And how can they be injured without a work-related injury?

From the perspective of the rule of law and the construction of a harmonious society, it is necessary to keep pace with the times, so that the law can protect workers' rights and interests.

on

In other words, we should not hold the idea that "an example can not be abolished and no case can not be promoted".

Like the workers who were bitten by wild dogs in the middle of the night, they spent hundreds of dollars on medical expenses, but the company refused to reimburse them for various reasons, which was a little cold-blooded.

When a worker is bitten by a wild dog on his way out of work, even if he does not calculate the work-related injury, can the company care and sympathies?

"Colleagues were bitten by wild dogs at work in the middle of the night, and hundreds of dollars were spent on medical expenses, but the company refused to reimburse them for various reasons". Sina's "Liu Chang 0127" issued this micro-blog caused a heated debate among friends. Some people think that this situation should be considered as a work-related injury.

Xi'an City People's Bureau staff responded that this is not a work-related injury, the injured person can claim compensation from the owner.

(October 10th Chinese business daily)

The staff of the Xi'an Municipal Bureau of social affairs responded that it was not a work-related injury when they were bitten by wild dogs on the way to work. In fact, the response was not cold blooded, but a legal basis.

Work-related injuries refer to injuries and occupational injuries suffered by laborers when they engage in professional activities or activities related to professional activities.

As for the identification of work-related injuries, the third chapter of the regulations on industrial injury insurance stipulates clearly that among them, on the way to commute, injuries caused by traffic accidents or urban rail pit, passenger ferry and train accidents shall be identified as work-related injuries.

In the provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the administration of industrial injury insurance cases carried out in September 1, 2014, the issue of "commuting on the way to work" has been further refined.

The provision is clearly defined as

On the way to and from work on the reasonable routes of the workplace and the place of residence, the place of habitation and the dormitory of the unit, and on the way to and from work on the reasonable route with the spouse, parents and children's place of residence within a reasonable period of time; engaging in activities that are required for daily work and life, and commuting on a reasonable and reasonable route; and commuting on the other reasonable routes within a reasonable time.

It is not hard to see that neither the industrial injury insurance Ordinance nor the Supreme People's court's provisions on certain issues concerning industrial injury insurance administrative cases, it is not clear that other circumstances except traffic accidents on the commuting hours can be identified as work-related injuries.

Naturally, workers are bitten by wild dogs when they get off work.