Why Does The United States Engage In TPP?

Chinese Commerce Minister Gao Hucheng exchanged diplomatic notes with Beijing Ambassador Kim Jang soo in Beijing. China and ROK jointly affirmed that the free trade agreement between People's Republic of China and Republic of Korea will come into effect in January 1, 2016 and reduce taxes for the first time, and the second reduction in January 1, 2016.

On the same day in Sydney, Chinese ambassador to Australia Ma Zhaoxu and Australian ambassador to China Adams exchanged diplomatic notes on behalf of the two governments. The two sides jointly confirmed that the free trade agreement between the People's Republic of China and Australia government will come into effect in December 20, 2015 and reduce the tax for the first time, and the second tax reduction in January 1, 2016.

What nets are being woven by the United States and Japan? TPP! It is also known as "kicking fart" or "economic NATO" by Chinese folk, and its full name is "Trans -Pacific Partnership Agreement".

This is a multilateral free trade agreement, which has been brewing for a number of years and reached an agreement during the eleven golden week of this year.

However, there is still a long way to go before the formal signing and entry into force.

China, as the world's second largest economy and a pivotal power in the Asia Pacific region, is temporarily excluded by TPP.

The United States and Japan are the dominant countries in this agreement.

In fact, for the United States and Japan, there are also such problems.

But now they are still reserved.

When the bargaining and face of both sides have reached a certain degree, cooperation is still a necessary option.

In fact, China has tried TPP's new trade rules in Shanghai and other free trade experimentation area, and the negative list system also has plans implemented throughout the country.

Win-win cooperation is a general trend that no one can resist.

First, the United States believes that WTO members are complicated and different countries have different stages of development and different demands, so it is difficult to reach any new agreements.

Therefore, we need to start a new business.

Therefore, the United States hopes to promote trade liberalization through bilateral agreements and multilateral agreements.

Among the multilateral agreements, TPP (p Pacific Partnership Agreement) and TTIP (

.

According to the US concept, the core contents of the new international trade order include: negative list system, national treatment before admission, as well as environmental protection, labor rights, intellectual property rights, pnational corporations' rights and interests, restrictions on state-owned enterprises and so on.

These prices are temporarily unbearable for many developing countries.

In other words, by rebuilding the "circle of friends", the United States gained the power to set rules and consolidate its dominance.

Second, by rebuilding the "circle of friends", the United States has also gained the power of "who to join and not to join".

For example, in the circle of friends of TPP, the United States temporarily does not want China to join.

If China wants to join in the future, it will have to meet a series of conditions.

But Vietnam and Philippines lagged behind China's development stage, but they were first drawn into the TPP circle of friends.

The reason, you know!

Can not join

This circle of friends does not mean that China has nothing to do with it.

In addition to the multilateral Road, China can also take the "path" of bilateral agreements.

The Sino Korean bilateral agreement, which is about to take effect in December 20th, is a classic.

Australia is one of the 12 sponsors of TPP, and bilateral trade agreements between China and Australia are tearing TPP apart.

Although South Korea has not become a TPP sponsor, it is likely to join China earlier.

Moreover, South Korea is the traditional ally of the United States. Its economic scale ranks fourteenth in the world, and its position in the Asia Pacific region is remarkable.

Why don't Korea and Australia take the lead in watching American faces?

Signing bilateral FTA? Look at the main content of an article on the US Forbes website.

10. Indonesia.

China accounts for about 10% of Indonesia's exports, equivalent to 2% of its GDP..

9. Thailand.

China accounts for about 12% of Thailand's exports, equivalent to 7% of its GDP..

8. Malaysia.

China accounts for about 12% of the country's exports, equivalent to 10% of its GDP..

7. Brazil.

China accounts for 18% of Brazil's exports, and is Brazil's largest overseas market.

But for Brazil's total GDP, exports to China account for only 2%.

6. Peru.

China accounts for 19% of Peru's exports, about 4% of its GDP..

5. Japan.

China also accounts for about 19% of Japan's exports, equivalent to 3% of its GDP..

4. Chile.

China accounts for 23% of Chile's export market, and exports to China account for about 8%. of Chile's GDP.

3. Korea.

Despite the volatility of the Chinese market, South Korea has been very strong.

China accounts for about 25% of South Korea's exports, about 11% of its GDP..

2. Taiwan, China.

26% of Taiwan's exports go to mainland China, and up to 16% of its economic output depends on the mainland of China.

1. Australia.

Iron ore makes China's share of global exports to Australia as high as 34%.

This amount accounts for about 6%. of the total GDP in Australia.

That is to say, if we calculate according to the state, Australia and South Korea are economically most dependent on China (in fact, Mongolia, North Korea, Russia, Vietnam and Central Asia are also very dependent on China).

They get together with China in order to develop economy and improve people's livelihood. From a politician's point of view, they are to win voters.

Why do the European allies of the United States come to "Asia Investment Bank"? The same is true.