The Suspension Of The Gem Has Increased To 15 As Of Last Week.

What is noteworthy is that last week, the number of enterprises that stopped censorship was higher than the previous week.

Increase.

A week ago, the number of enterprises stopping censorship was only 18.

Last week, the newly discontinued censorship team came mainly from the SME Board of Shenzhen Stock Exchange. There were 9.

In addition, the number of Shanghai Stock Exchange enterprises increased from 7 to 8, and the number of gem enterprises increased from 11 to 15.

Of these aborted enterprises, there are 16.

The reason is that "the issuer's qualification is doubtful or the intermediary's practice is limited, which leads to the failure of the audit process."

In this regard, there is a reluctance to disclose the identity of the brokerage investment bankers said that the reasons for the suspension of the review of these enterprises, the vast majority of the company law firms involved.

According to observation, the law firms employed by the 16 companies in addition to Sichuan Tawau agricultural science and technology hired Beijing City Jin Du law firm, Shenzhen Jun Da photoelectric hired Thai and Thai law firm, the other 14 are all Beijing City Bank of China law firm.

It is reported that the Bank of China was suspected of not being diligent in the process of providing securities services in IPO, a Liaoning Zhen Long special stock company. According to the relevant regulations of the securities law, the SFC decided to file an investigation.

In March 13, 2015, the Securities Association of China organized the drawing of lots of spot checks on the quality of information disclosure of IPO enterprises. Among the 40 companies participating in the lottery, the Limited by Share Ltd of Liaoning Zhen Long specialty and the Sichuan imperial sanitary ware Limited by Share Ltd were caught.

The Bank of China has "dragged" many others.

Non public offering.

For example, the announcement issued in February 2nd in Songjiang, Tianjin, said that the Beijing Municipal Bank of China law firm, which was hired by the company's non-public offering shares, was placed on file for investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission because of other financial problems in the trial. The CSRC issued the notice of suspension of examination (No. 151871) in January 29, 2016, and decided to suspend the application of the non-public offering.

The Atlantic, Zhangzhou, Yin Zhijie and so on were also dragged down by BOC.

All these companies announced that they had received the notice of suspension of the administrative licensing application of the China Securities Regulatory Commission issued by the SFC, and decided to suspend the examination of the application for administrative licensing of the company's non-public offering of shares.

However, these companies have commissioned new law firms to provide legal services for the company's non-public offering.