China'S Terminal Consumption Quality And Efficiency Are Greatly Reduced.

99%, electricity providers are unable to earn money, plus hiring people to brush screens, bribing "small two" to raise their rankings and other cost expenditures, making the electricity supplier live like an old year.

Wang Xiaohua believes that such a business model is not sustainable at all.

Why do Taobao and Tmall force the "industrial downgrade" instead of upgrading? The reason is very simple, super vicious competition!

Where is the problem of unsustainable business models? What is more serious is that it makes China's economy move towards a "no profit era", making China's economy fast.

The quality and efficiency have been greatly reduced, which is seriously deviated from the central and the economic development mode of "quality and efficiency" advocated by President Xi.

We must understand that the quality and efficiency of the economy must be and must ultimately be reflected in the quality and efficiency of consumption.

In other words, the quality and efficiency of consumption determine the quality and efficiency of the economy.

Over time, China's industry is not upgrading, but dying out.

We say that the central government encourages innovation is the right choice.

But what kind of innovation is encouraged? There are significant directional problems here.

In my opinion, what kind of innovation should be encouraged and what kind of innovation must be restricted must have preconditions and standards, and must conform to the basic laws of the economy.

In England, I talked with a jazz.

When asked, the knight bluntly said that China allowed the electricity supplier to grow so fast, which was a serious mistake in social economic management.

He said that the British government and entrepreneurs are not stupid, they build several e-commerce platforms easy, but why not do government restrictions, entrepreneurs are also very wise.

Because the British government knows that a small commercial shop is behind a middle-class family that destroys their living environment, which is a social disaster.

The Jazz told me.

Its basic rule is not only to buy and sell goods, but also to attract people and the public to the streets.

When their family and two shops are looking for a satisfactory dress, they will probably have a "random consumption" that is far more than the value of one garment.

For example, if two couples go shopping, they may have food and drink consumption. They may watch a movie together. If they have children, they may buy something for children that they never wanted to buy at all.

Moreover, such a shopping behavior of the public has made a city generate great vitality, and it is an important urban landscape.

Therefore, jazz believes that electricity providers are by no means a good way to stimulate social consumption, but rather destroy consumption.

Listening to jazz makes me feel extremely ashamed.

Let's take a look at our city. Let alone take Beijing as an example. Under the impact of the electricity supplier, a large number of businesses will go bankrupt.

What's the result? The commercial landscape of the famous Wangfujing, Xidan and Da Palan is gone forever.

When a courier rode a low-grade three rounds, crossed the dark streets, and sent a large number of "junk products" to every household day and night, did we ever think that after the "genuine" shops were crushed, we would buy a "real product" in the future, where could we buy it?

I think it's time for us to win.

If the lights of our commercial block go out, and how long it will take to light up, and how much social cost is between them, foreigners can understand all this.

"Double 11", when the people immersed in the "explosion of junk buying" happiness, Ali in the US stock market prices plummeted.

Because American investors believe that the behavior of counterfeit and flooded screens will make Ali lose growth.

Of course, they also expressed their worries about China's economy.