Stock Market Fraud Is Actually The Two Tier Market Investors.

Alienation, simply speaking, is the process of turning oneself into a non self.

In philosophy, alienation is the process of changing things into their opposites.

Alienation has been a sensitive topic.

But alienation is everywhere in reality, and so is the stock market.

For example, the increase of holdings, especially the increase of large shareholders, is alienation. What does alienation become? The process of alienation as a major shareholder affects the share price and manages the market value of the company.

The increase of large shareholders becomes chairman's holdings, and the chairman's holdings are changed into employees' holdings. The chairman is usually the owner of the company, but is it not strange that the chairman himself does not increase his holdings and mobilize his employees to increase their holdings? Of course, the chairman of the board is not just talking his lips. The chairman will also promise his employees that you will increase your profits and earn your money.

This promise sounds beautiful, but it is full of deception.

Deceiving is actually the two tier market investors.

From the similar concept to the present, Shui Po has not yet seen which Chairman really subsidized the employee's holdings.

In fact, such a call started from the stock market crash after July 2015. At that time, a large number of company stock prices collapsed, and the SFC publicly called for the rescue of the stock market and explicitly asked the listed companies to help themselves. One of the five major options was the increase of large shareholders.

Though once

There has been an increase of 18%, but we all know that after the failure of the reorganization, the fall of the storm technology has exceeded 68%. If such a decrease, if the employee responds to Feng Xin's call for a high level of holdings, he will not know how much money the chairman can have to subsidize everyone.

More frankly, if the chairman really feels that his company's share price is low enough and low enough to bear it, why not sell it to employees for such a bargain?

Further, if the chairman of the board has no money to make up the warehouse, how can he expect him to shoulder the responsibility of the bottom of his pocket or his heart is powerless?

Therefore, the so-called "bottom up" is simply flickering.

This kind of flicker is not aimless. In fact, the company that announces the plan can gain instant results. CLOU electronics is the best among them. The previous announcement of its holdings has earned 6 trading boards, even though it has nearly 40% gains so far. Therefore, CLOU electronics, which tasted the sweetness, has become an attempt of the second house.

The city people are too deep in their routines.

The shareholding cost of large shareholders is always a mystery. Some people worry about the danger that the stocks will be burst, and how many companies will be changed.

Even seventy percent off is a kind of cash settlement; therefore, the new regulation of non reduction in size is not binding on the major shareholders of these pledge. The injured party is actually an institution that has already seized a number of stocks. It can not be strong enough to compensate for the losses. It depends on how large the bubble is and how much value the large shareholders withdraw.

China's stock market is undergoing pformation as a vested interest.

The group will find the balance between long term business and short-term cash in the market. If a company fails to sell and sell three billion of its shell, who will concentrate on business? If the liquidation reduction is far beyond the profit of a lifetime, who else will worry about the price rise and fall all the time? The problem is that the cost of this balance will always be borne by others, and this role may only be a retail investor.

This is the essence of the chairman's call for employees to take the initiative to increase their holdings. Either the iron chicken does not want to bleed, or the landlord family has no surplus grain. In short, it is not authentic.

I wonder when the SFC will supervise such a large shareholder statement without any binding force.

Flicker, also must have the bottom line.

For more information, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats and Internet cafes.