• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Adidas'S Two Infringement Charges Against Cage Were Dismissed By The Court.

    2017/6/28 10:25:00 183

    SkechAdidasDesign

     Cage

    Sports brand

    Cage

    and

    Adidas

    There is a final conclusion on the dispute between Shanzhai.

    According to the world clothing and shoe net, recently, the US federal court dismissed Adidas's two accusations against Cage. The former pointed out that the Cage MegaBlade series copied the concept of its Springblade "blade fighters" shoes, and put forward to prevent Cage from selling the moving shoes, but eventually lost the lawsuit.

    In fact, this is the second time that Skech was sent to court by Adidas. In September 2015, Adidas accused Cage of copying his classic representative, Stan Smith.

    In the first instance of last February, Adidas won the lawsuit. The second instance is expected to take place in April 2018.

     Cage

    Bilateral

    Design

    The concept is very similar.

    At present, the two second court offices began in July last year, and Adidas accused it of illegally copying the design concept of its own brand sports shoes.

    The German brand claims that Skech intentionally infringed two patents on Adidas's Springblade "blade warrior" series three years ago in its Mega Flex 2 and Mega Flex 3.0 two sports shoes.

    This unique running shoe has a knife edge at the bottom, which supposedly provides high performance support and resilience for runners.

    For the two patent disputes, the court finally rejected the claim filed by Adidas.

    Judge Michael Simon (Michael Simon) said, "Adidas provides evidence of irreparable losses, a lot of speculation, lack of convincing enough to prove that Mega Blade sports shoes have a serious impact on the Springblade series."

    After winning the battle, Cage, chairman of Michael Greenberg of the US company, said publicly: "a year ago, when Adidas obtained the patent, the Cage Mega Blade shoes had already started marketing."

    Therefore, the court also believes that Cage does not exist intentionally violating intellectual property rights.

    Skech, who won this year, was founded in 1992 in California, USA, and originally started with a single product of leather boots, and began to enter the fitness market in 2009.

    Because of its moderate price and comfortable clothing, its fitness shoes quickly became popular in the mainland and gradually became the popular footwear brand of American consumers.

    With the help of sports shoes, in the 2014 fiscal year, Cage's sales reached $24 billion, and the company's share price doubled.

    In 2015, Skech continued to show a "black horse" attitude. The sports shoes Market Report of NPD, a research firm, showed that Adidas was pushing Adidas and Under Armour to rank second in the US market share of 5%, second only to sports giant Nike.

    In addition, it is worth noting that in 2016, Skech's sales in the Chinese market increased by 89% over the same period last year, and the brand's Chinese business grew rapidly.

    In parallel with the growth of its performance, in recent years, Skech has been involved in many plagiarism lawsuits.

    In addition to disputes with Adidas, Cage was accused of Nike in January last year, claiming that he had violated Nike's up to 8 patents in the past two years.

    Another sports brand CONVERSE also accused Cage of having mass production, distribution or sale of Shanzhai CONVERSE Chuck Taylor classic sneakers in 2014.

    At present, Adidas's plagiarism accusation has been dismissed, and Cage has finally breathed a sigh of relief, but it still takes time for the brand to completely remove the name of "Shanzhai addiction".

    More interesting reports, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats net.

    • Related reading

    The Technical Specification For Application And Issuance Of Emission Permits For Leather Industry Is About To Be Released.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/5/14 14:46:00
    78

    How To Avoid The Risks Caused By The Brush Up Behavior Under The Network Environment

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/4/17 22:30:00
    157

    Many Fake Websites In China Are Prosecuted By Dior

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/4/13 10:56:00
    48

    Pollution Problem In Printing And Dyeing Industry Is Serious.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/3/30 10:05:00
    62

    Water Pollution Control Actions, Layers Of Printing, Printing And Dyeing Industry Take The Lead In Achieving Certified Emissions.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/3/27 10:51:00
    108
    Read the next article

    "Ya Meng Pie" Children'S Clothing: A Card To Design A Stand Out

    Huzhou Zhili Yangshi knitted garments Co., Ltd.'s "Ya Meng pie" children's clothing in the use of color is also very characteristic, playing the original concept of color, with pure color of their own......

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 92国产精品午夜福利免费| 青青青青青国产免费手机看视频| 99视频精品全部在线观看| 亚洲激情小视频| 免费无码AV一区二区| 国产成人一区二区三区电影网站| 国产精品亚洲专区无码不卡| 国产精品美女久久久久| 国产黄大片在线观看| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 国产福利一区二区| 国产成人影院在线观看| 国产成人精品一区二区三区无码| 国产三级一区二区三区| 伊人色综合久久天天网| 亚洲www视频| 么公的又大又深又硬视频| 久久精品亚洲综合| 久久久久综合国产| 免费中文字幕不卡视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久| 亚洲av成人综合网| 久久午夜精品视频| a级毛片免费看| 最新jizz欧美| 麻豆成人精品国产免费| 蝌蚪久热精品视频在线观看| 男人扒开女人下身添免费| 欧美日韩欧美日韩| 日本xxxx在线观看| 国产色爽免费视频| 和搜子居的日子2中文版| 亚洲国产成人精品青青草原| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区午夜 | 亚洲另类无码专区丝袜| 中国成人在线视频| caoporn97在线视频进入| 黄色毛片视频免费| 老司机在线精品| 特黄大片aaaaa毛片| 日本高清电影免费播放|