• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Adidas'S Two Infringement Charges Against Cage Were Dismissed By The Court.

    2017/6/28 10:25:00 183

    SkechAdidasDesign

     Cage

    Sports brand

    Cage

    and

    Adidas

    There is a final conclusion on the dispute between Shanzhai.

    According to the world clothing and shoe net, recently, the US federal court dismissed Adidas's two accusations against Cage. The former pointed out that the Cage MegaBlade series copied the concept of its Springblade "blade fighters" shoes, and put forward to prevent Cage from selling the moving shoes, but eventually lost the lawsuit.

    In fact, this is the second time that Skech was sent to court by Adidas. In September 2015, Adidas accused Cage of copying his classic representative, Stan Smith.

    In the first instance of last February, Adidas won the lawsuit. The second instance is expected to take place in April 2018.

     Cage

    Bilateral

    Design

    The concept is very similar.

    At present, the two second court offices began in July last year, and Adidas accused it of illegally copying the design concept of its own brand sports shoes.

    The German brand claims that Skech intentionally infringed two patents on Adidas's Springblade "blade warrior" series three years ago in its Mega Flex 2 and Mega Flex 3.0 two sports shoes.

    This unique running shoe has a knife edge at the bottom, which supposedly provides high performance support and resilience for runners.

    For the two patent disputes, the court finally rejected the claim filed by Adidas.

    Judge Michael Simon (Michael Simon) said, "Adidas provides evidence of irreparable losses, a lot of speculation, lack of convincing enough to prove that Mega Blade sports shoes have a serious impact on the Springblade series."

    After winning the battle, Cage, chairman of Michael Greenberg of the US company, said publicly: "a year ago, when Adidas obtained the patent, the Cage Mega Blade shoes had already started marketing."

    Therefore, the court also believes that Cage does not exist intentionally violating intellectual property rights.

    Skech, who won this year, was founded in 1992 in California, USA, and originally started with a single product of leather boots, and began to enter the fitness market in 2009.

    Because of its moderate price and comfortable clothing, its fitness shoes quickly became popular in the mainland and gradually became the popular footwear brand of American consumers.

    With the help of sports shoes, in the 2014 fiscal year, Cage's sales reached $24 billion, and the company's share price doubled.

    In 2015, Skech continued to show a "black horse" attitude. The sports shoes Market Report of NPD, a research firm, showed that Adidas was pushing Adidas and Under Armour to rank second in the US market share of 5%, second only to sports giant Nike.

    In addition, it is worth noting that in 2016, Skech's sales in the Chinese market increased by 89% over the same period last year, and the brand's Chinese business grew rapidly.

    In parallel with the growth of its performance, in recent years, Skech has been involved in many plagiarism lawsuits.

    In addition to disputes with Adidas, Cage was accused of Nike in January last year, claiming that he had violated Nike's up to 8 patents in the past two years.

    Another sports brand CONVERSE also accused Cage of having mass production, distribution or sale of Shanzhai CONVERSE Chuck Taylor classic sneakers in 2014.

    At present, Adidas's plagiarism accusation has been dismissed, and Cage has finally breathed a sigh of relief, but it still takes time for the brand to completely remove the name of "Shanzhai addiction".

    More interesting reports, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats net.

    • Related reading

    The Technical Specification For Application And Issuance Of Emission Permits For Leather Industry Is About To Be Released.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/5/14 14:46:00
    78

    How To Avoid The Risks Caused By The Brush Up Behavior Under The Network Environment

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/4/17 22:30:00
    157

    Many Fake Websites In China Are Prosecuted By Dior

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/4/13 10:56:00
    48

    Pollution Problem In Printing And Dyeing Industry Is Serious.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/3/30 10:05:00
    62

    Water Pollution Control Actions, Layers Of Printing, Printing And Dyeing Industry Take The Lead In Achieving Certified Emissions.

    Industry standard
    |
    2017/3/27 10:51:00
    108
    Read the next article

    "Ya Meng Pie" Children'S Clothing: A Card To Design A Stand Out

    Huzhou Zhili Yangshi knitted garments Co., Ltd.'s "Ya Meng pie" children's clothing in the use of color is also very characteristic, playing the original concept of color, with pure color of their own......

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产免费人人看大香伊| 日韩亚洲综合精品国产| 大胸妈妈的朋友| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品 | 国产精品男男视频一区二区三区| 亚洲色图激情文学| 99精品无人区乱码在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 在线亚洲人成电影网站色www| 国产精品美女一区二区| 亚洲日韩国产欧美一区二区三区| 97久久天天综合色天天综合色hd| 污视频免费在线观看网站| 国内精品久久久人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久久| 2019中文字幕在线观看| 欧美三级在线看中文字幕| 国产欧美色一区二区三区| 久久精品国产99国产精2020丨| 香港伦理电影三级中文字幕| 日本一二三高清| 国产成人va亚洲电影| 久久午夜宫电影网| 老司机福利深夜亚洲入口| 娇小xxxxx性开放| 亚洲第一成年免费网站| 最新jizz欧美| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线播放 | 91香蕉短视频| 欧洲成人全免费视频网站| 国产卡一卡二卡3卡4乱码| 中文字幕免费视频| 男人扒开女人腿使劲桶动态图| 国精产品一区一区三区MBA下载 | 免费黄网在线观看| 99在线精品免费视频九九视| 欧美白人最猛性xxxxx欧美馆| 国产男女免费完整视频| 久久亚洲国产精品123区| 精品国产精品国产偷麻豆| 在线观看精品一区|