The Boss Is Good, The Middle Is Bad.

This is not a question of singing red faces and white faces, but rather about the responsibilities of both the boss and the manager.

Take the company project center as an example.

Some consultants in the project center have some extra invoices to claim for reimbursement, and have been accepted by the project center leaders. They have been cut down to me and turned into cadres and good people. I am a bad person. This influence is very bad and bad.

It should be the person in charge of the project center who is talking about principles and systems and putting them away so that we can cooperate well.

I am the maker of the system, and I should modify the system.

You do the cadre to change the system, but I maintain the system, the whole management is reversed, this how to do.

Therefore, some cadres will not be officials.

The real principle should be middle level cadres. What they need most is to talk about principles and safeguard the dignity of the system.

Our problem is that middle level cadres do not talk about principles and have no principled firmness.

It is embarrassing for me to talk about principles, because I am both an owner and an operator.

If I talk about principles, employees do not understand and believe that I care about those tens of dollars, which is very troublesome.

If the person in charge of the project center gets stuck, this is normal, because this is not his money.

The employee then comes to me. I say dozens of dollars. Let's give it to him. That's better.

This is good cooperation, that's what it means.

The boss must be a good man and a bad man.

When I was general manager of a group company, I offended many people. Why?

Because I am the boss and the chairman.

If I am a good person, if you say this, you can find the boss and find the chairman, and what general manager should I do?

It is not a breach of principle to be a bad person, but a feeling for a bad person. It must be manifested in the conflict of interests.