Volume Recruitment Frequent &Nbsp; Alleged Radish Recruitment

Recently, many places in the country have exposed many "radish Recruitment" events.

Experts believe that although the local Party committee and government have made afterward remedies and disposal, the most important thing is accountability and accountability.

Experts pointed out that the system of public recruitment is not lacking in China, and the crux of the current problem is "no shortage of system implementation".

In recent years, some local organs and enterprises have been exposed to cadres' children.

Present situation

"Radish Recruitment" frequently staged

At the end of December 2010, a document on the request to arrange the work of children was circulated on the Internet. The report was made by Cao Changqing, director of personnel affairs of Lengshuijiang, Hunan.

The report asked the municipal Party committee and municipal government leaders to "arrange their sons to work in the Municipal Finance Bureau".

The report also contains the written instructions of the "consent" of the party secretary, mayor and deputy mayor of the Lengshuijiang.

According to the survey, Cao Changqing's son graduated from university in 2011, but the Lengshuijiang office has agreed to employ it to a public institution.

Since then, the head of the municipal Party committee and municipal government of the Lengshuijiang said that Cao Changqing criticized the education of the organization and abolished the qualification of Cao Zi.

Recently, there are many places in the country have been found "radish Recruitment" incident.

In the Hecheng District of Huaihua, Hunan, "the rural finance office and the community recruitment prospectus" in 2010, there are three items in the registration conditions: "parents have one or both sides in the Hecheng District organs, enterprises and institutions" and so on. They are referred to by the public opinion to take care of the "official two generation". In the recruitment of public housing units in Chaohu City, Chaohu, Anhui, only applicants from the district students or parents who work in District organs and institutions are allowed to sign up.

Accountability

Re recruitment into "shield"

Experts believe that the recent discovery of "radish Recruitment" incident, the local Party committee and government have done after the remedial and disposal, but the most important thing is accountability, accountability to people.

Re recruitment and other practices can not be a "shield for exemption", but not a "accountability barrier".

First, who is accountable to it? Zou Rong, a professor of the East China University of political science and law and an expert in administrative law, for example, said, "is the leader of the municipal Party committee or municipal government who has personally written instructions in Lengshuijiang" is also a "responsible person"?

Second, "to push back" to cover up the responsibility? Zou Rong said, in the number of "radish Recruitment" incident, once the incident was exposed, the relevant responsibility department will be inclined to cancel the original recruitment, change the rules from the beginning.

"But have they ever thought about it, and some of them have passed the written examination through the proper way to pass the written examination, so that they can" accompany "properly?" Zou Rong said, "" push back and go again "must not be a cover up, and the front of the" black box operation "will also be written off.

Crux

Lack of system and lack of execution

Wang Xuejie, a professor at the Hunan provincial Party school, said that "internal control" led to alienation of recruitment, taking advantage of power and so on to care for the interests of a few people, injure the fairness and justice of society, hurt most people's interests, and inevitably hurt the credibility of the government, and lead to a "solidified" tendency in the social hierarchy.

Experts pointed out that the system of public recruitment is not lacking in China, and the crux of the current problem is "no shortage of system implementation".

Wang Xuejie said that although the system has basically guaranteed openness, pparency, fairness and impartiality, a good system will not be implemented or implemented without supervision. The system will become an ornament. It is difficult to restrict "black box operation" and abuse of power, which is worse than no system.