Stock 315:18 Listed Companies Frequently Appear "Flicker".
Besides being able to get money for rapid development, listed companies are also known for their standardized governance structure.
However, since the date of the stock market, false disclosures and fraudulent information are also born. It is not new to fool investors and regulators.
The data obtained from WIND information show that since 2000, more than 50 cases of deceiving investors by listed companies have been appealed to the court.
Listed company
18.
In these cases, there are many investors familiar with Dongfang Electronics, Yinguangxia, ST Kelon,
polaroid
And other listed companies.
Among them, Dongfang Electronics has been accused of false financial reports in court in October 2003, and has been sentenced to 6 and a half years in March 2011. 2716 cases were specifically handled, involving 6989 natural persons or legal persons, involving 442 million 420 thousand yuan.
One of the most typical examples is hang Xiao steel, which has "seduced" ordinary investors abroad.
The unknown listed company, in the bull market from 2006 to early 2007, has been in the low consolidation stage, and the stock price has been almost too strong to breathe.
However, since February 12, 2007, the company's share price has pulled out 12 daily trading boards, rising from 4.5 yuan to 14 yuan.
Subsequently, the company signed 34 billion 400 million yuan of information on the overseas list. The manager of the company declared that "the contract itself has no problems at all."
But with the in-depth investigation of the media, the fox's tail gradually revealed itself. The price tag was regarded as a "ghost trick" between capital players and hang Xiao steel.
However, the lifting of capital to stock prices remained strong. At the end of May, it had climbed to 30 yuan and more than 6 times in 3 months. "
Star stock
"Evolved into" monster stocks ".
Subsequently, hang Xiao steel structure began to shake up and down steadily, and some investors who had been stuck up at high levels suddenly realized that they were carrying "sedan chairs" for others.
From May 2007, the SFC and the public security departments were involved in the investigation. After more than 2 years in 2009, the face of "the first case of disclosing insider information" was uncovered.
Investors are sad and fearful. It is capital pushing hands to create this "famous stock".
Just like the "prostitute", the hang Xiao steel structure, which is famous for its reputation, is always on the list of "big guys". Its subsequent equity incentives and its entry into the real estate industry are frequent. At the end of last year, it was also a big order from India.
All of these are cases of cheating investors, and regulators have been cheated.
In December 14, 2000, the first case of fraudulent listing of Listed Companies in China was sentenced in the intermediate people's Court of Chengdu, but the Hongguang industry involved in the case had no money to pay the fine again.
In the prospectus issued in May 1997, Hongguang industry concealed the fact that the huge loss of 53 million 778 thousand yuan in the previous year was 54 million 280 thousand yuan in net profit and 108 million 58 thousand yuan in false profits.
At present, because of the gradual improvement of the securities market mechanism, there are few such cases as fraudulent listing of Hongguang industries, but the cases of cheating investors are still endless.
These cases are a long process from committing a crime to finding out, and it often takes more than 2 years to start from investigation and sentencing.
The hardships may only be realized only by the parties. No wonder some of the victims were finally drawn to a decision, but without the joy of victory.
A private investor said that retail investors had better not touch such "monster stocks", and the best way to brake unreliable information was static braking.
It is suggested that we should pay attention to basic research and find some solid stocks.
{page_break}
List of fraudulent cases of listed companies since 2000 | |||||||
Serial number | Stock code | Stock abbreviation | Announcement date | Name of case | Types of litigation | Amount involved (10000 yuan) | Case brief |
One |
000682.SZ |
Orient Electronics |
2011-3-2 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
Forty-four thousand two hundred and forty-two | The Qingdao intermediate people's court informed that as at the end of 2005, the number of civil compensation cases involving false statements by the local stockholders was 2716, involving 6989 investors and 442 million 420 thousand yuan involved. |
Two |
000908.SZ |
*ST Tianyi |
2010-2-11 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
One hundred and fifty-seven point nine | Chen Jianping and other 4 investors filed a lawsuit against the Changsha intermediate people's Court on the grounds of false security information disputes, demanding that the company compensate the economic losses totaling 78 thousand and 400 yuan. |
Three |
000034.SZ | *ST Shen Tai |
2009-12-24 |
Escape from capital account |
Criminal action |
| Suspected of running away the capital of the Shenzhen Municipal Commission of Agriculture Investment Co., Ltd., a subsidiary company, was prosecuted by the Baoan District people's Procuratorate of Shenzhen. |
Four |
600656.SH | ST Fang Yuan |
2009-11-21 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
| The intermediate people's Court of Guangzhou accepted Yang Qianming and Jiang Yan's claim for compensation for Securities Misrepresentation. |
Five |
000862.SZ | Silver Star Energy |
2009-6-24 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
Fifty-seven point five eight | Fu Yuefu and other 11 small and medium-sized investors complained about the company's false statement of civil compensation litigation. The case was filed by the intermediate people's Court of Yinchuan, the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. The total amount claimed is nearly 600 thousand yuan. |
Six |
600856.SH | Changbai group |
2009-3-4 |
Disputes about shareholders' right to know |
Civil action |
| The dispute between the company and the two largest shareholders was settled, and the court lifted the right. Gao Li group Holding the 30 million 500 thousand shares of Changbai group was frozen and finally ended with the withdrawal of Gao Li group. |
Seven |
000921.SZ |
ST Kelon |
2008-10-16 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
| The Guangzhou intermediate people's court held a trial of four false securities information disputes involving Liao Zhaowen and four others, including the company, DDT Hua Yong accounting firm, Gu Chujun, Yan Yousong, Zhang Hong and Liu Congmeng. The total amount involved was 193 thousand and 600 yuan. |
Eight |
000557.SZ |
*ST Guangxia |
2006-4-26 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
Fourteen point five six | Bai Songhua, the plaintiff, complained about the company's false statement about the civil compensation dispute, and demanded compensation of 145 thousand and 600 yuan. |
Nine |
600234.SH | *ST Tianlong |
2005-11-18 |
Concealment account book |
Criminal action |
| Huang Rong, former financial manager of Taiyuan Tianlong Group Limited by Share Ltd Dongguan branch and company holding company, former deputy general manager of Zhuhai Nintaus Electronics Industry Co., Ltd., is suspected of committing a crime. |
Ten |
000540.SZ | Zhongtian City Investment |
2005-10-18 |
Market manipulation case |
Criminal action |
One hundred | Liu Zhiyuan, the company's actual controller, was sentenced to three years' imprisonment and three years' probation for alleged manipulation of the price of securities trading. Major shareholder century Xingye Investment Limited was fined 1 million yuan. |
Eleven |
600151.SH | Aerospace electromechanical |
2004-10-23 |
Escape from capital account |
Criminal action |
| Shen Shen, the founder, shareholder and former general manager of the Shanghai aerospace Follett Industries Limited, was sentenced to a fixed-term imprisonment of two years and six months and a fine of 200 thousand yuan. |
Twelve |
000620.SZ | S*ST saint |
2004-4-27 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
One hundred and seventy-five point two four | The 53 investors claimed that the company was punished by the SFC in November 1999 for the announcement of the company's acquisition of the 98% stake in Shanghai SF technology, resulting in a loss of stock investment and a compensation of 1 million 752 thousand and 400 yuan in investment losses. |
Thirteen |
600622.SH | Garbo group |
2004-3-20 |
False securities information dispute case |
Civil action |
| Dozens of investors complained that the company's information disclosure was false, false, and investigated by the securities regulatory authorities, resulting in huge losses in its investment. |
Fourteen |
600647.SH | Tongda venture |
2004-3-19 |
False securities information dispute case |
Civil action |
| Former shareholders Jin Guizhen, Niu Yufen and Jin Yuzhen filed a lawsuit with the first intermediate people's Court of Shanghai because of the company's false securities information dispute, demanding compensation for economic losses of 210 thousand yuan. |
Fifteen |
600781.SH | Shanghai Fu Ren |
2004-3-19 |
Withdrawal of funds and false registration of funds |
Criminal action |
| The first branch of Shanghai people's Procuratorate charged Sun Fengjuan, who was guilty of escaping from capital and false registration of capital. |
Sixteen |
000008.SZ | ST Polaroid |
2003-9-26 |
Stock price manipulation case |
Criminal action |
| Yi An technology investors sued the company for manipulating its stock price, causing huge direct economic losses to investors. |
Seventeen |
600190.SH | port of jinzhou |
2003-3-19 |
False securities information dispute |
Civil action |
| Wang Jian Zhong, Pang Bo and Yang Guangyao jointly complained of false securities information in Jinzhou port, which required 79 thousand and 900 yuan for compensation. |
Eighteen |
000620.SZ |
S*ST saint |
2002-8-30 |
False information dispute |
Civil action |
Sixty point five two | The company's public shareholders claim compensation for the loss of 605 thousand and 200 yuan due to the company's announcement of false statements to the company. |
Source: WIND information |
- Related reading
The Restriction Order Was Issued By &Nbsp; Where Did The Capital Market Flow To The Property Market?
|[NPC And CPPCC Express] Gao Dekang, Deputy To The National People'S Congress: To Provide A Strong Judicial Guarantee For The Development Of Private Economy
|Yuan Chunqing, Secretary Of The Shanxi Provincial Committee, Talks About Economic Pformation
|- Gem | See The Key To Starting A Business From Scratch!
- Logistics skills | DELL'S Competitive Advantage In Logistics And Distribution
- Finished shoes | Air&Nbsp; Force&Nbsp; 1 Trend Culture
- Gem | Five Elements To Help College Students To Start Their Own Businesses Are Unbeaten.
- Recommended topics | 12 Suggestions For Wearing High Heels
- Gem | Entrepreneurship Has A Brilliant Idea!
- Boss work together | How Does "Boss" Communicate With Employees?
- Logistics skills | What Is The Mentality Of Logistics?
- Office attire | Dress Etiquette In Office Etiquette
- quotations analysis | Jiangsu And Zhejiang Market In September 29Th: Nylon Yarn Rose So Strong.
- Artificial Silk Fabric Is Full Of Activity.
- The Impact Of High Oil Prices On Traditional Cars And Textiles Or Clothing Or Affected
- Jed Lee'S Half Naked Tattoo To Commemorate Chinese Male Model 30Th Anniversary
- Clothing And Footwear Complaints
- Humen Name Shopping Women And Baby Products City Came Out In October
- Don'T Let Your Face Ruin Family Business.
- Fujian Shishi: Add Color To "Leisure Clothing City"
- The "333" In Venture Capital Investment
- Focus On Policy And Earthquake &Nbsp; Grasp Structural Opportunities In Balance.
- Hubei Textile 1 Billion Enterprises Increased To 8