1 Yuan Adidas Shoes Flicker &Nbsp; Dangdang Net Gets Into Lawsuit.

First, hang out 1 yuan and a pair of ADI shoes to attract consumers to order. Dangdang then refused to cash in on the grounds of system errors.

In August 29th, the reporter learned that the Beijing Dongcheng court had accepted 7 consumers such as Liu Ting's prosecution of Dangdang. The 7 plaintiffs were from Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Guangxi, Zhejiang, Hubei, Jiangsu, Shanghai and so on.

Origin

Dangdang second days to go back

In the early morning of July 28th, Dangdang was named after its name.

In August 2nd, Dangdang formally apologized to consumers, and decided to give each consumer bill worth 200 yuan.

Dangdang explained that this preferential activity was caused by staff's operational errors, so all orders must be cancelled.

Rights protection

7 plaintiffs filed suit

Require Dangdang to fulfill the contract

For Dangdang announced the handling method, consumers are not satisfied, and spontaneously set up the "1 yuan ADI shoes rights group", joint litigation rights protection.

The consumer said in the indictment that the defendant Dangdang's act violated the provisions of the contract law and seriously infringed upon its legitimate rights and interests. Therefore, it sued the court for the defendant to continue to perform the contract according to the contents of the order, and delivered 2 pairs of Adidas sports shoes with a number of pairs of 133 pairs.

The 7 plaintiff's main claim is to fulfil the contract and deliver the 7 plaintiff's order.

Hu Yihua, lawyer of Han Liang law firm in Beijing, believes that the current online shopping market is chaotic. The website uses 1 yuan and other extremely low prices to attract consumers to kill tens of thousands of yuan and tens of thousands of Yuan products.

Consumers purchase goods from the shop can be regarded as a contract with legal effect. Both parties should fulfill their responsibilities. Otherwise, they should bear the responsibility for breach of contract.

Simultaneous broadcasting

Dangdang faces the biggest scale of rights protection

In August 3rd, a Samsung mobile phone on Dangdang was sold at a price tag of 110 yuan. Although the price of the product was corrected to $1100 an hour later, many consumers bought it, but it was told that the order was cancelled.

At 0:00 a.m. in August 9th, Dangdang launched the "Dangdang paternity group good book and good manners 72 hours rush to buy" children's book sales promotion activities, including the original price of 1800 yuan "what is what" multiple parent books, sold at a rush price of around 50 yuan.

Many consumers stayed up late buying orders in front of the computer. However, a few hours later, many consumers who took part in the snapping activities received the notice of cancellation of orders. This is the third price Oolong incident in Dangdang network in 13 days.

According to Zhao Zhanling, a researcher at the intellectual property center of China University of Political Science and Law, many consumers who have been affected by Dangdang's wrong price gate have established a collective rights protection organization in August 9th. At present, the number of people participating in the right protection has reached more than 1700 people, of whom more than 520 have already paid the litigation costs. The right side plan recently formally sued Dangdang in Beijing Dongcheng court.

Zhao said the case will become the largest consumer rights protection case in the country.