ADI And Other Giants Have Been Faced With &Nbsp By Environmental Groups, And 8 Years Of Zero Emissions Have Been Questioned.

Report six months ago

In November of last year, Lining and Adidas were named by Greenpeace.

Toxic water chain under N PE pollution

It is understood that the Greenpeace released investigation report is still targeting many international and domestic brands.

Unlike the six months ago, the Greenpeace report was built on the environment of researchers simulating standard household laundry. The washing effect of 14 samples including Adidas, Nike, Lining and H & M was tested, and the comparison of N PE content before and after washing was carried out. The results showed that the pollution caused by the textile industry is not only confined to the production area, but also extends to the consumption area, causing toxic and harmful substances in the global circulation chain.

That is, ordinary consumers will passively discharge these substances into the water system during their daily laundry.

"N PE harms human beings through two channels, one is through the food chain, the other is by drinking water polluted by N PE."

In an interview with reporters in Nandu, Li Yifang stressed that N P E will accumulate in the human body and has a strong persistence.

This is the third report of Greenpeace on the release of harmful substances from well-known clothing brand products.

Last year, the group issued two related reports. The first one investigated the emissions of toxic and harmful substances in China's textile industry, and second confirmed that N PE residues in the products of 15 well-known clothing brands including the enterprises mentioned above.

Drug companies have said they will solve the problem within 8 years.

In fact, when the second Green Peace report was released in August last year, the Li Ning Co made it clear that it would announce the response measures by the end of the year.

Lining did not go back on his word. In November 2011, three months later, Lining's official website said in a statement: "after a generation or a shorter time, we will achieve the goal of zero emissions of harmful chemicals in the supply chain and product life cycle through systematic changes.

Lining promised to zero chemical emissions by 2020.

In addition, Adidas, H & M, C &A, Nike and Puma together with Lining jointly released the "joint roadmap for zero emissions of hazardous chemicals in the supply chain system" in November 2011. The roadmap pledged to communicate with all suppliers about the mission of zero discharge of hazardous chemicals, and put forward a list of chemical substances in garment manufacturing industry by the end of 2012, and publicly disclose pilot projects and research results.

These enterprises also disclosed the contact ways of the specific responsible departments, and put forward a positive attitude of "welcome supervision".

Li's side has affirmed the attitude of these enterprises.

According to her introduction, since last year's first report was published, Greenpeace and related enterprises have communicated, including Puma, Nike and Lining and other enterprises have responded and experienced repeated processes. At present, these enterprises have set up several project surveys, one of which includes investigating the source and scope of application of N PE.

She also pointed out in particular that the Li Ning Co statement was at least "a step away from nothing" in the management of products' toxic and hazardous chemicals.

{page_break}

8 years too long, detoxification should seize the day.

But in Li's view, this is far from enough.

She first pointed out that Lining listed the list of hazardous substances. "For most substances control is just copying the legal provisions, for the realization of the supply chain and products to completely eliminate these toxic and harmful substances, there is still a long way to go."

In addition, she thought the action was too slow for these enterprises to "achieve zero emissions of harmful chemicals in 2020".

"According to the current situation, by 2020, the pollution of rivers and lakes in China will be very serious, and the old road of pollution will be proved to be costly in any country."

Li Fang mentioned the "heavy metal pollution in Japan" more than 40 years ago, and even after spending about 800000000000 yen to deal with it, the pain caused by pollution is still lingering.

As for the adoption of N PE is the commonality of China's garment manufacturing industry, or only the big brands mentioned in the report will be used.

Li Fang replied that in the past, Greenpeace had looked at some non famous enterprises, and then turned to famous enterprises. The aim is to hope that the high attention of these enterprises can arouse more people's attention and hope that they can play an exemplary role.

It is reported that NPE as a printing and dyeing auxiliaries is not irreplaceable, Europe and the United States began to use substitutes ten years ago.

In this way, Lining and other enterprises really need to spend 8 years to "solve" these harmful substances, or 2020, is only a time statement.

In response, Nandu journalists tried to contact Lining's public relations department, but until the time of sending the manuscript, the relevant person in charge was always on the phone.

Viewpoint

NPE will not directly harm the health of wearers.

In a written reply to reporters in Nandu, Adidas said: "there is no evidence that N PE found in clothing will directly harm the health of wearers."

All our products are tested by internationally renowned testing organizations.

Our products sold around the world are safe and comply with all regulations and regulations.

Since 1998, we have implemented the "harmful substances restriction policy", and clearly targeted at improving the environmental impact of our supply chain.

The test results released by Greenpeace show that our N PE concentration is far below the target value, which proves that our policy is effective.

Over the past 15 years, we have continuously reduced the number of harmful chemicals and will continue to reduce the use of harmful chemicals in the supply chain system.