Unauthorized Printing Of "Big Wolf" On Children'S Shoes Was Convicted Of Infringing The Right To Issue.

Animated cartoon "pleasant goat and grey wolf" after hot, printed with "pleasant goat" and "big wolf" and other cartoon images of various products are also widely touted.

Some businesses have been authorized without authorization.

。

The copyright owner of the cartoon image, a cultural communication company in Shanghai, started their nationwide activism, and the major supermarkets in the country were the first defendants.

Recently, an intellectual property dispute caused by children's shoes with "big wolf" cartoon images sold in supermarkets was heard in the court of the park. The supermarket was convicted of violating the right to distribute the cartoon images of "big wolf".

This cultural communication company in Shanghai has carried out.

Investigation found that a supermarket in our city is selling.

Unauthorized use of the "big wolf" cartoon image art works violated the right to distribute and reproduce the product.

After completing the forensics work, the Shanghai company sent a petition to the court, demanding that the supermarket stop infringement and compensate for the economic losses.

In the lawsuit, the supermarket argued that its children's shoes had a regular purchase channel, and the supplier guaranteed the intellectual property rights in the purchase contract. Once the products involved in infringing intellectual property rights, all legal consequences caused by the supplier would be borne by the supplier company.

After receiving the petition, the supermarket has returned the children's shoes.

Therefore, the supermarket believes that there is no intention of infringement, and should not bear legal liability.

According to the court's trial, "grey wolf" is the main cartoon character of the animated cartoon "pleasant goat and grey wolf" with high social popularity.

The defendant supermarket should pay attention to the famous cartoon character of "big wolf" when purchasing children's shoes. It also has a reasonable obligation to check whether the supplier is authorized by the owner.

The supermarket can not prove that it has fulfilled the obligation of reasonable review only by buying and selling contracts.

In the end, the court found that the defendant supermarket had sold to the public the goods printed with the "big wolf" cartoon image without permission from the right person, violated the "gray wolf" cartoon image art distribution rights, and immediately stopped the infringement and assumed the liability of compensation.