Textile Standards Need Upgraded Version Of Enterprises

< p > > a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_q.asp" > Standard < /a > is an important technical support for economic and social activities. As at the end of 2013, the standard of textile industry's centralized management reached 1848 items (including 642 national standards and 1206 industry standards), which was 3 times more than that of the early 80s of the last century. It formed a national standard and line standards, and forced and recommended coordination. The general foundation and method matched with the product standards. It covered various industries including textile fiber, yarn, fabric, products, clothing and textile equipment, covering the three major application fields of household, household and industrial applications, and played an important technical support role in promoting the development of China's textile industry.

< /p >

< p > Standardization Technology Committee and technology import unit reached 27, and gathered more than 2000 experts in standardization.

Our country is taking the lead in setting up 17 international standard projects. It has undertaken 5 Secretariat of ISO technical institutions, and 2 experts have been elected chairmen of the international standardization technology agency. This has greatly enhanced our country's right to speak in the field of international textile standards.

Governments at all levels, industry groups, enterprises and consumers are highly concerned about standard work. Standard chemical industry has played a positive role in serving economic and social development.

< /p >

< p > however, there are still some urgent problems to be solved in the standardization work.

First, the standard setting targets are becoming more and more detailed, and the number of standards has increased substantially. However, the standard coverage is getting smaller and smaller, and there are coexisting contradictions between standards and lack of standard and old obsolete problems.

< /p >

< p > two is a large number of product standards developed by the state and industry in recent years, and a number of recommended product standards have been issued, making the boundary between Chinese government standards and enterprise standards more and more blurred. Dislocation, offside and absence are serious.

In addition, in the quality supervision and market trade, the enterprise standard is subject to "non national treatment", the space of enterprise standard is squeezed, the status gradually loses, and the function gradually weakens.

< /p >

< p > three, after a large number of refined product standards have been formulated as national standards or industry standards, the proportion of product standards has risen sharply, and now has more than half.

This is far from the structure of the general and method standards in the international and foreign developed countries' standard system, and the standard type structure is seriously out of tune.

< /p >

< p > four is due to the superposition of the above reasons. In addition, in recent years, a series of incentive policies have been issued to encourage enterprises to make national standards and bank standards, which has shifted the focus of enterprises to the formulation of government standards, thus neglecting the construction and implementation of the enterprise's own standard system, weakening the power of enterprises to improve product quality and product innovation to a certain extent.

< /p >

< p > five is driven by the local reward policy, standards become the "starting point" and "commanding point" that individual organizations and organizations are chasing and trying to control, and the standard is alienated into profit making tools and the risk of being run as an industry.

The existence and interlacing of these problems increase the entropy of standard system and increase the systematic risk of standard work.

< /p >

< p > standard is for a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_s.asp" > Industrial Development < /a > service. In building China's upgraded version of the economy, the standard upgrade is imperative. The emphasis is on five aspects.

< /p >

< p > one is to strengthen the top-level design and promote the marketization of the standard. Our current standard work is born out of the planned economy period, and still has strong planning color. The unified standard structure has not adapted to the market economy system today, and can not meet the market demand for standards.

In addition, the new standard form of enterprise standard, social group standard, alliance standard and so on are lack of legal positioning and not being included in the national quality supervision system, nor can they form effective standard supply.

{page_break} < /p >

< p > in accordance with the general requirements of the comprehensive deepening reform in the third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the textile industry should also play a decisive role in the standardization of resource allocation, decentralization and decentralization, promote the marketization of standards, hand over the standards set by the society and enterprises to the society and enterprises, and achieve the return of government standards. At the same time, the government should promote the construction of a fair, fair and open legal environment for standardization so that all kinds of standards can perform their duties and responsibilities.

< /p >

< p > two is to promote the establishment of the three level standard system of government, society and enterprises: the reform of standard system, and the relationship between the three of the government, society and enterprises must be handled well.

At present, we need to define the responsibilities and scope of these three categories of standards, clarify the relationship between these three standards, and formulate corresponding management methods to standardize them.

< /p >

< p > three is the status and function of strengthening enterprise standards: the current standardization law regards enterprise standards as an important level in the four level standard system of our country, but has not fully expressed the important position and role of enterprise product standards in market trade, especially in product quality supervision.

Enterprises are the main body of the market and the main body of product quality. Under the premise of carrying out the national mandatory requirements, enterprises should have certain autonomy in accordance with the market and consumer demand and the construction of their own brand.

At the government and social levels, we need to pay more attention to the formulation of standards for commonweal, industry and foundation.

< /p >

< p > four is the need for standardization of social organizations: compared with the international standard system, China lacks the standard of social organizations.

In fact, some associations and industrial alliances in the industry have explored a small number of association standards and alliance standards. However, due to the absence of relevant regulations in the current regulations, these standards have no practical significance and role.

In order to meet the market demand and solve the problem of effective supply of standards, we should play the role of the standards of social organizations.

But it needs to be positioned at the legal level, accurately define the scope of social group standards, and at the same time, in the case of "one industry, many meetings", we should formulate relevant management methods, and standardize the various levels and types of social organizations.

< /p >

< p > five is to establish standards from the end use and promote the construction of trade standard system: as stated above, we must establish a standard system of government standards, social (Group) standards and enterprise standards, and we must streamline the existing government standard system, and turn the standards that can be produced by the market mechanism to the market.

< /p >

An important way to streamline P is to set up the "a href=" http://www.91se91.com/business/ "trade" /a "standard from the end use perspective, carry out the" downsizing "of the existing government standards, improve the role of government standards in strengthening macro-control and establishing a unified market, and strengthen the security role in health, safety and environmental protection. Social organizations should also set the trade standard as the criterion, and make the production standard independently by enterprises, so that the standard's service, support and leading role in the industry can be truly liberated.

< /p >