The Lawyer Hints That It Is Against The Law To Deduct The "Clothing Fee" Of The Resignation Officer.

< p > the world is < a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > dress < /a > a target= "_blank" href= "_blank". < /p >
< p style= "text-align: center" > img border= "0" alt= "align=" center "src=" /uploadimages/201404/23/20140423090228_sj.JPG "/" < < > >
< p > recently, two teachers engaged in security work encountered difficulties in the process of resignation, which were deducted by 300 yuan and 1000 yuan respectively. The incident has aroused widespread concern in the community. In the end, after a multi party coordination, a security guard had taken back the deposit that had been withheld. Another person's situation was being investigated and dealt with by the Department of human resources and social affairs. < /p >
< p > Liu Yang, 27 years old, Changsha city. He said he had worked in security company for 3 years, and this year he intends to go out and rush to the company while he is young. He has resigned to the company, but he was told to buckle more than 1000 yuan. He communicated with the company several times, but it had no effect. < /p >
< p > Bei Rong Wu, 52 years old, from Huaihua. He went to security company to be a security guard in 2012. When he signed the contract, he said he would quit his job. < /p >
< p > in January 8th of this year, he resigned a month in advance. I did not expect the company to deduct 300 yuan of clothing charges. He and a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > Company "/a" negotiation many times also useless. In February 20th, the company handled his departure formalities, and the 300 yuan clothing fee was not returned to him. < /p >
< p > February 21st, Liu Yang complained to the relevant departments. It is understood that a company official who asked not to be named denied this, saying that it was impossible for their company not to give a contract to the recruiter. < /p >
< p > and the head of the company of beainnon Wu said in an interview that there was indeed 300 yuan of money not settled to beainon Wu, but this was the money for the two sets of security clothing purchased by himself when he was hired, and the money was handed over to the clothing company, and their company was only collecting it. So there is no question of their companies deducting the cost of clothing. < /p >
< p > < strong > [statement] < /strong > /p >
< p > according to the relevant laws and regulations, the labor condition is a necessary part of the labor contract, and the use of professional clothing such as security clothing is only limited to the work. Therefore, if the clothing belongs to the means of production which constitutes the necessary labor conditions, the employer has the obligation to provide. < /p >
< p > although the law does not expressly prohibit the collection of clothing fees, if clothing is used as a necessary labor condition, the collection of clothing fees is essentially a disguised form of deposit, and the labor department usually handles the deposit according to the regulations. In addition, the ninth article < < a href= > http://www.91se91.com/news/index_q.asp > > < /a > > clearly stipulates that the employing unit shall not detain the employee's identity card and other documents, nor shall he require the laborer to provide a guarantee or to collect property from him in his name. Therefore, the two complainants can submit evidence to the labor department for complaint. < /p >