Home >

Jiangcheng First Time Litigate Haining Leather City Brand Lawsuit Lawsuit

2014/5/23 9:33:00 35

buy < a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > Leather > /a > where to go? Many people will choose the "Haining leather city" with reputation outside. According to the reporter, at present, there are at least four leather cities in Wuhan. Before that, the controversy about whether the "leather city of Haining" is true or not has been continuously debated, and the vast number of consumers have lost their way in Haining. Yesterday, Haining China Leather City Limited by Share Ltd (Zhejiang) filed a complaint against Wuhan Sino Ruida Real Estate Development Co., Ltd., Wuhan anti Ruida Operation Management Co., Ltd., which was held in Wuhan middle court. This is also the first time that the "Haining leather city" competition was held in Jiangcheng. 
 trial focus .
 defendant's infringement and unfair competition 
 plaintiff claims that in 2012, the defendant, without authorization, named the market of Zhong Fang Shang Jie street in Zhong Jia village, Hanyang, Wuhan, as "Haining leather city" and "Haining Leather City in Central China". It marked the marked location of "Haining leather city" in the prominent place, such as publicity signs and banners hung at the entrance of the market and in the market, which constituted unfair competition and should bear corresponding legal responsibilities. In addition, the defendant emphasizes the relevance of the "Haining leather city" in Zhejiang in the Handbook of investment promotion, and publicize it as a selling point on some websites. It uses the similar logo of the registered trademark of "Haining China Leather City" owned by the plaintiff on the same service type, and infringes the plaintiff's exclusive right to use the trademark "Haining China Leather City". 
 yesterday's trial, only the attorney of the defendant and the defendant came to the scene. The reporter noticed that both lawyers were well prepared and dragged the suitcase full of relevant information. During the trial, the defendant's attorney general denied the plaintiff's petition, claiming that the exclusive right of the registered trademark of "Haining China Leather City" in Zhejiang began in January last year, but the defendant was already using the "Haining leather city" trademark in August 2012. In addition, the "leather city of Haining" is not the exclusive service name of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has no right to prohibit the defendant from making proper use of the common name or place name in the registered trademark. The "leather city of Haining" can refer specifically to the mall where Haining people sell leather, and the actual situation is also true, so there is no infringement and unfair competition. 
 for the compensation amount of more than 287 yuan, the two sides had a heated debate. The trial judge suggested that the two sides should mediate. The case will be sentenced to sentencing. 
 both sides say "/strong > .
 < a > href= > http://www.91se91.com/news/index_p.asp > > Zhejiang > /a > the company is lawfully clean.
 according to the press, Zhejiang "Haining China Leather City" reached the "brand agreement" with Hubei Jin Lian Min Sheng holdings as early as 2010, and Wuhan Haining leather city was opened in Hanyang last October. Since then, "Haining leather city of Wuhan" has been negotiating with other Wuhan "leather cities" in the form of notices, newspapers, radio stations and sending lawyers' letters, but the other party is not buying it. 
 after the court hearing, the reporter interviewed Wang Chuanli, the plaintiff's attorney, in the face of the question of why reporters chose to file a lawsuit in Wuhan and whether they had the purpose of advertising through litigation. He said that because Wuhan had fought fiercely about the "public opinion war" on Haining leather City, "the headquarters wanted to take this lawsuit to the root of the matter", and there was no purpose of advertising through litigation. In view of several other "Haining leather cities" in Wuhan, will Zhejiang continue to fight the lawsuit? Wang said that he had only been entrusted with the lawsuit, and that the headquarters should be followed. 
 at the trial court, the reporter also interviewed Zhong Manjun, the defendant's attorney, for "whether to agree to mediation". She said she was "just a general agent and had to go back to discuss". In the face of other questions, she said "it is not convenient to disclose". 
 yesterday afternoon, the reporter found the market of Zhong Fang street in Zhong Jia village, Hanyang. A cleaning worker beside the market told reporters that the leather city has been closed. When reporters entered the market, they saw that the doors of their businesses were locked, rather cold. There is no word "Haining leather city" in the market entrance. It is now called "leather street in China's anti business street". The reporter then contacted the head of the Wuhan defense Ruida company by telephone. The other said the case had not been decided and did not accept any interviews. 
 link > /strong > /p >
 Haining China Leather City Limited by Share Ltd, the plaintiff of this case, is a state-owned holding company initiated by Haining asset management company and Haining market development service center. It was established in February 1999 with a registered capital of 1 billion 120 million yuan, and its main business is the development of the professional market of leather products, etc. in February 1999. 
 January 26, 2010, the company listed on the Shenzhen stock exchange. In January last year, the company obtained the trademark exclusive right of < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_s.asp > Haining China Leather City < /a >.