Read: "The Most Stringent Environmental Law In History"

In recent years, the policy topic that has been heated by the industry since last year is the "most stringent" environmental protection law in history.

Where to start:

On 2014, the eighth session of the Standing Committee of the twelve National People's Congress voted to adopt the newly revised environmental protection law and was formally implemented in January 1, 2015.

Immediately after that, the Ministry of environmental protection issued 4 supporting documents, namely, the Interim Measures for the successive punishment of environmental protection, the Interim Measures for the implementation of environmental protection, seizure and seizure, and the Interim Measures for the regulation of environmental protection production and production stoppage. These documents make the laws stipulated by the law no longer a castle in the air, which means that the illegal cost of enterprises will be very high in the future.

It is not enough that one law and four regulations have increased the supervision over enterprises. Soon after that, the State Council issued a document - "notice on strengthening environmental supervision and law enforcement". The document pointed out that it is necessary to "do not leave regulatory dead zones, do not exist in the blind area of law enforcement, declare war on pollution", "persist in heavy punishment and punish chaos, iron fist and iron pollution control, take comprehensive measures, and always maintain a high tension against illegal environmental laws". "Effective settlement of unclear responsibilities, unclear responsibilities and local protection issues" once again demonstrates our resolute determination to declare war against pollution.

The analysis pointed out that the newly revised environmental protection law has three strictness: first, stricter demands on enterprises, especially the strict measures for the first time to stipulate the "daily penalty", which will give pollution enterprises the biggest illegal costs that have never been seen; two, stricter demands on local governments, a clear link between environmental protection and the assessment of cadres; three, stricter demands on regulatory authorities, nine dereliction of duty and strict administrative accountability measures.

The printing and dyeing industry has always been a major polluter in all industries.

According to the 2012 environmental statistics, in the 41 industrial sectors surveyed and surveyed, the textile industry wastewater discharge volume is 23.7 billion tons, ranking third, mainly from the printing and dyeing industry; chemical oxygen demand emissions 277 thousand tons, ranking fourth; ammonia nitrogen emissions 19 thousand tons, ranking fourth.

In the 972 national control sections monitored by the ten major river systems, the ratios of water quality to grade I, III, IV, V and bad V were 63.1%, 25.3% and 11.6%, respectively.

The main pollution indicators were chemical oxygen demand (COD), five day biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD) and total phosphorus (tbod) and Liaohe River, Huaihe River and Haihe River system. The total number of IV-V and bad V sections exceeded 50%.

Especially in the eastern region where economic development is relatively fast, pollution is the heaviest.

Now the state's access policy for printing and dyeing has been stricter and stricter. The indirect discharge standard of wastewater has been raised to CODCr200mg/L, and the sensitive area has even reached CODCr60mg/L.

Industry experts pointed out that "the new standard is relatively harsh to the actual situation of domestic printing and dyeing, but at present, the advanced printing and dyeing enterprises in China have basically reached the standard, and some have even made indirect emission of COD 150mg/L.

But for most small and medium-sized printing and dyeing enterprises, the pressure is still very heavy. "

In the face of stringent emission standards, enterprises can only save themselves. It is reported that more than 90 printing and dyeing enterprises in Shaoxing have made loans from the bank for 1 billion 660 million yuan in the form of mortgage of wastewater discharge rights, and the sewage discharge system of printing and dyeing enterprises in Xiaoshan, Zhejiang has also been upgraded in accordance with the requirements.

Now environmental protection has become the life and death line of enterprises. Local governments have also issued many local documents to encourage enterprises to save energy and reduce emissions and increase supervision. In the future, textile industry must realize that environmental protection requirements will be stricter and stricter if they want to achieve sustainable development. After all, the quality of development under the new normal is only high quality, and the future is more hopeful.

2015 is known as China's "new normal" year.

Why is 2015 known as China's "new normal" year?

What is the reason?

Many commentaries have pointed out: "since the current administration took office, the new policy has been frequent, and one of the most common words is" new normal ".

Since it is "new normal", the government's macroeconomic regulation and control means must have new changes. Under the influence of the new normal, the development of the physical industry will also have profound changes.

How will it change? Where is the direction of policy control? According to the current stage of national economic and industrial development, structural adjustment is the top priority.

However, we should see that in the developed economies of Europe and America, the adjustment of industrial structure is the goal of macroeconomic policy, while developing countries are the opposite.

Developing countries often adjust and intervene the investment and production behaviors of micro entities with macroeconomic policies, so as to establish a more reasonable industrial structure in a relatively short period of time.

Therefore, the adjustment of industrial structure has also become one of the key economic policy objectives of developing countries.

In the future, the adjustment of China's industrial structure will become an important part of economic change under the new normal.

For the textile industry, which is an important part of the manufacturing industry, the adjustment of industrial structure is also an important strategic task for the textile industry at present and in the coming period.

Since adjustment is necessary, there should be an adjustment of the "rules". This kind of "rules" must conform to the laws of the development of the industry, and it should not be painful or itchy. It should aim at the current major development contradictions in precise governance as well as maintain the competitiveness of the industry. It should not only support the objectives of short-term economic development, but also weigh the strategic needs of long-term development.

"Rules" are very important.

Since the beginning of the year of 2015, new policies, new regulations and new standards have appeared frequently in the textile industry.

First, the product list of the General Administration of Customs adjusted the export tax rebate rate, and then adjusted the tariff rate of cotton import and export. Then, the most stringent "environmental protection law" was promulgated in the history of industry, and the Ministry of environmental protection revised the discharge standard of pollutants for textile dyeing and finishing industry, and recently promulgated the policy of "reducing import tariffs on fur clothing, shoes and other consumer goods in June 1st".

Industry competition is more and more intense, and the survival of enterprises is more and more difficult.

Of course, there are many plans to promote the development of the industry when a series of "magic incantation" is introduced frequently.

In Ningxia, for example, "at the beginning of this year,"

In the medium and long term development plan, Shishi has also promulgated the "three years plan for the textile and footwear industry", and Xinjiang is a new wave to promote the development of the textile industry.

In addition, the Guangdong PTA project EIA decentralization municipal level, this year continue to exempted the export textile inspection and quarantine fees, the AQSIQ issued the promotion of cross-border electricity supplier development guidance document and other good news, to boost industry confidence also played a positive role.

At the same time, the industry has also issued some new standards since 2015, such as the implementation of the classification standard of industrial textiles in March 1st, the new rules for Pilling of household textiles, the new OEKO-TEX standard, and the establishment of standards for infants and children textiles, which is of great significance for the healthy and sustainable development of the industry.

All policies and regulations are ultimately aimed at better promoting the development of the industry and adapting to the current "new normal".

Yes, the new normal brings the severe challenges of the economic downturn, but at the same time, it also contains a major opportunity for industrial pformation. It is both a turning point and a new starting point.

To this end, textile enterprises must understand and understand in a unified way, and make precise decisions, take the initiative to act as opportunities, and firmly grasp the initiative of pformation and development.

The textile industry should be said to be one of the earliest industries benefiting from the policy of "reform and opening up". "Reform and opening up" is also one of the most important national strategic policies of all the industrial policies currently on the development of the industry.

With the deepening of reform and opening up, industry development is facing more and more complex internal and external environment. Many industry policies emerge as the times require. However, it is regrettable that some policies have become a "magic spell" for the development of enterprises.

Cotton policy: "zero policy" is the final Utopia.

In the past three years, the cotton market has experienced a roller coaster ride up and down, suffered thousands of Yuan's internal and external cotton prices, and cotton spinning enterprises died.

Cotton, an important textile material, has experienced a life and death struggle like a Phoenix.

In 2014, "direct subsidy" instead of "collecting and storing", textile enterprises gave a sigh of relief, but the industry is facing new problems.

The determination of target price, the pressure of cotton reserves, and the reality of cotton farmers' difficulty in buying cotton.

According to the survey conducted by China Cotton Trade Association on the member enterprises, the overall performance of the enterprises is better than that of the same period last year, but confidence is gradually recovering, but it is still not very optimistic.

It has been reflected by enterprises for a long time.

Industry and textile industry are closely linked. The smooth operation of the textile industry is inseparable from the healthy development of the cotton industry. Some problems existing in the cotton industry at present have brought resistance to the sustainable development of the cotton industry and the pformation and upgrading of the textile industry.

Enterprises believe that not only the textile industry must be market-oriented, but also the agricultural products should be marketed. The industries or enterprises that rely solely on subsidies and preferential policies will get narrower and narrower.

As cotton textile enterprises reflect, China should become a textile power from a big textile country. Cotton quality and production of textile products are equally important.

At present, the national cotton policy is basically a quantitative index. There is no qualitative index, which restricts and restricts the development of the textile industry to a certain extent.

Therefore, the cotton problem in China must be systematically studied and analyzed, especially in terms of quality, development in many aspects such as seed, planting, processing, processing technology and equipment, machine production, inspection index and so on, so as to ensure quality assurance, moderate cost and global market price.

At the same time, we should pay close attention to the links in the industrial chain, and we should timely pmit the demands of textile mills to cotton processing and planting ends.

In addition to the situation reflected by the enterprises, some policy analysts pointed out that the cotton market should eventually achieve healthy development, and the existing cotton protection policy should be completely negated, including the purchase and storage policy, the price subsidy policy and the bottom price purchase.

"The common feature of these policies is to stimulate the enthusiasm of cotton growers," he said. "It is bound to increase the planting area and increase production. Even if it does not increase, it will not reduce much, so that the excess capacity will continue to expand."

Collecting and storing has really solved the problem of cotton farmers' difficulty in selling cotton, but pferred the problem to the state, and now the state does not purchase and store it, instead of changing it into a target price subsidy policy. It also needs to digest the huge stock formed by the purchase and storage. How can cotton enterprises buy the new cotton that is more than domestic demand, like the State Reserve, then the phenomenon of selling cotton will be difficult. At that time, cotton is likely not to be in the hands of cotton traders, or in the hands of cotton farmers or backlog in the national storage.

For the target price subsidy policy currently implemented in Xinjiang and other regions, the analyst pointed out: "if there is no bottom line to carry out the full price difference subsidy, cotton farmers can get subsidies at a very low price; even if the market price of the subsidy is set, it is almost certain that the new cotton will be sold below the market price. Although the cotton farmers can get the full subsidy from the price difference between the market price and the target price, they will also lose money.

The government has taken so much money to protect the interests of cotton farmers, but it has been discounted and failed to achieve the desired results.

It believes that the market must be truly realized by eliminating the courage and abolish any form of cotton protection policy.