Textile Quality Inspection And Current Situation Analysis

Quality inspection is an important function entrusted by the government to the Inspection Bureau. It involves the interests of the enterprise, the trust of the people, and the national economy and the people's livelihood.

However, in recent years, complaints of quality and safety incidents have been frequent. To some extent, the work of fiber inspection needs to be further improved.

The following is a simple analysis.

Quality inspection problems and the status of simple analysis and analysis.

1. the revision of standard is lagging behind the market, resulting in the problem product without basis.

Products in the market are changing with each passing day. Standards should play a leading role in monitoring and monitoring.

However, there are often complaints about product quality problems, or no assessment of product standards, or no assessment criteria, resulting in unfounded judgments. Consumers are very unhappy and complain that the quality supervision bureau is useless.

For example, coating in recent years

With its bright colors, convenient washing and comfortable feel (some products), clothing is well received by consumers. However, the state has no corresponding standard assessment, and the enterprise standard information is not smooth, resulting in some quality problems that can not be solved.

2., the requirements of the standards are too low, resulting in low entry barriers to the market, which can not meet consumer demand.

Because the "product quality law" limits the production of unqualified products, some "smart" producers or sellers mark the low principle in order to seek "insurance", so that the superior products are seldom seen in the market.

from

During the period from 2007 to 2010, a total of 1458 batches of samples were collected from the market supervision and spot checks of all kinds of garments and bedding products, which were organized by the Municipal Bureau of quality and technical supervision. The sample covers all the large, medium-sized and small shops in Xi'an, of which the 8 batch of the top quality goods is accounted for, accounting for 0.5% of the total spot checks; the 1074 batches of the first grade goods, accounting for 73.7% of the total spot checks; 360 batches of qualified products, accounting for 24.7% of the total spot checks; 16 16 of the unqualified grades, accounting for 1.1%.

Obviously, about 98.4% of the products of the first grade and the conforming product are rated, and the standards allow the products of these grades to have some defects. This gives the green light to some "unsound" products, leaving behind the hidden danger of quality.

It can be seen that the vast majority of products in the market are presented with some defects that are allowed to appear in the eyes of buyers, while the superior products with high demand for indicators are very poor, just like a dummy.

To exaggerate, people are rich but can't buy good things. They often hear many dealers and consumers complain that the price of clothing is too high and the quality is too bad. In fact, most of them are caused by low-grade products.

Therefore, it is considered that the standard requirement is too low to a certain extent a protective umbrella for inferior products.

3., the lack of effective publicity of standards, the phenomenon of enterprises without standard production is widespread, shopping centers pass the stage mostly, and some quality important projects lack effective supervision.

The implementation standard and product quality grade are often introduced by us, and which grade is considered good or good. In addition, some producers and suppliers generally delegate the inspection reports of individual items to the whole batch of products for inspection results. The general requirements of the shopping malls generally require a qualified report to be done. They do not pay much attention to or do not understand the quality control of other aspects. In addition, because some law enforcement inspections mainly work against the national mandatory standards (safety and hygiene) requirements, most producers and distributors are conducting the inspection in these areas, while ignoring the control of other quality indicators that affect the usability, the quality problems of consumer complaints often occur, and the manufacturers provide quality inspection reports in that respect. In business reception, some clients do not know their products.

Therefore, I personally believe that our quality inspection departments have not done enough to guide enterprises to improve their product quality, and the importance of standards and the contents of assessment are not thorough enough, so that enterprises can not fully target the quality control.

1. the supervision after spot checks is incomplete, and the reexamination work after the rectification of substandard products has been carried out very little.

Every time the quality inspection department of the superior quality inspection department organizes the inspection and inspection results, there are some unqualified products. According to the "product quality law", after rectification, all of them should be re examined. However, a textile quality inspection unit has received nearly three years' business reception registration form, and no such delegation has been found.

So, whether the products after the supervision and inspection are all qualified? I did not have the right to make an investigation, but from January 2011 to November, I received 103 complaints from a famous large shopping mall in Xi'an (a small number of complaints caused by consumers' accidents). The situation is not optimistic. To a certain extent, those unqualified products still can not be reassured, or some quality problems that have not been passed repeatedly have not yet attracted the attention of producers and distributors. The problem products still exist. From a side, our supervision work is going through the motions, and it has no responsibility for the enterprises and the common people.

In the 2. part, the periodic inspection of enterprises is still in a state of paralysis, resulting in the lack of support and guidance from standardization departments.

In the business reception, we found that the vast majority of enterprise inspection items were often inspected by law enforcement agencies, and some of them directly told us that "just let out a qualified report". A considerable part of the inspection was carried out on individual items of the finished product, rather than when it was put into production. Therefore, to a certain extent, their inspection is entirely for some form checks. How can such an attitude ensure product quality? For various reasons, we failed to carry out regular inspections of enterprises. Therefore, lack of effective communication and communication between standards and technology is not conducive to improving the quality of products, nor is it conducive to the revision of standards, nor to improve our quality inspection level.

For example, GB.5296.4 - 1998 "consumer goods instructions, textiles and clothing instructions" standard, mainly involves 10 aspects, from the implementation of this standard has been more than ten years, however, judging from the inspection situation, there are still a considerable number of product labels are not qualified.

For example, the tagging of agents is always irregular, the washing instructions always tend to be formal, and the usage notes are always missing. For these difficult problems, the producers do not mark the right ones, or the dealers exaggerate the introduction of "pleasing" customers, intentionally concealing some facts, resulting in incorrect operation of consumers (some labelling is unreasonable) resulting in quality problems.

To a certain extent, this shows that our standard of corporate publicity is not enough, resulting in its lack of an accurate understanding of the essential connotation of standards, and inadequate popularization of some professional knowledge of consumers, resulting in insufficient understanding of the objectivity of some products.

Therefore, the quality problem is like cutting the leek.