Taiwan Shoe Enterprises Accuse Adidas Of Trademark Infringement War Rekindled

The intellectual property court hears a trademark lawsuit with malicious plagiarism, and the plaintiff is the old name of Taiwan.

The defendant is a famous sports brand in Germany.

The judge urged reconciliation between the two sides and decided to hold the court again at the end of July.

In the process, an old gentleman sat quietly in the auditorium, listened carefully to the attack and defense of the two lawyers, and made notes from time to time.

This old gentleman is 77 years old. His name is Chen Ruichang. He is a native of Taiwan.

The founder of the old brand.

He has successfully pushed the JUMP brand to the international market, and has also made an excellent sales record in the United States, becoming the second largest brand after NIKE.

During its heyday, it has dealers in 26 countries around the world. It is called the early shoe king of Taiwan, but it was also attracted by Adidas, which was launched in 1984. The two sides launched a trademark war for 32 years.

Both of you come to me and win or lose.

4 years ago, Chen Ruichang, the old shoe king, once forbore. The trademark wars between the two sides finally ceased. When the outside world thought that the two sides were reconciled, unexpectedly, Adidas began to stir up fire in Singapore earlier this year.

The old shoe king was intolerable, decided to take the lead in Singapore and face Adidas in Taiwan and malicious plagiarism.

The triangular trademark of the two sides disputed, Adidas appeared 8 years later than the gate, but Adidas still started the war and demanded that the trade mark be revoked.

Old shoe king Chen Ruichang told reporters: "along the way, many people advised me not to insist on, simply change a trademark to start again, but I always believe that since the trademark is designed by us, it has been shining in the world, for the dignity of Taiwan, can not give up!"

Chen Ruichang stressed that because Adidas is an internationally famous brand, many people will be preoccupied with the idea that "trade marks are copied from Ai Da Da", but in fact they are just the opposite.

The truth is that Adidas is using 3 lines of trademark to tell the door not to be completed. It is suspected of plagiarism launching a new trademark.

"Ridiculously, when Adidas told us, we advocate two trademarks, but they are against us, but they advocate" no similarity ". These are recorded in the verdict.