How To Solve The Economic Disputes In Live Broadcasting Platforms?

Recently, some media reported that about 500 anchors in Xi'an were helping the webcast platform "broadcast" for nearly 1 months. Not only did they not get the basic salary of the promise, they could not even log in to the account.

Anchor agent paid for nearly 1 months, but there is still no substantial progress so far, causing a heated debate on the Internet.

Anchor recruitment

And "brokers" have been contacted by WeChat.

In September of this year, it was introduced by a friend of the network master and agent two, to recruit the host for the broadcast platform.

The contact with Xiao Yu is not "broadcasting" platform officials, but two "brokers" from Nanjing, Zhou Chen and Zhou Yao.

Xiao Yu said Zhou Yao was mainly responsible for the contact with the brokerage company entrusted by the "broadcasting platform". Zhou Chen was responsible for docking with Xiaoyu and the main anchor he had recruited.

They have been contacted by WeChat and have not seen each other.

Zhou Chen and Zhou Yao requested the hosts to broadcast live from September 21st to October 20th in the "broadcast" platform, and promised to pay a basic salary of 2000 yuan per person and cash exchanged from fans donated during the live broadcast.

They agreed with drizzle and other anchors, before November 15th, to pay all the money that the anchor should get.

However, a few days after Xiao Yu and the 500 anchors she had recruited, in the early morning of November 5th, Xiao Yu and other anchors found that Zhou Chen and Zhou Yao removed them from the WeChat, and they realized that something was wrong.

So, Xiao Yu and several other anchor representatives were contacted by WeChat, which was represented by Zhou Chen and Zhou Yao.

This company is registered in Tibet, called Clark culture media Co., Ltd.

The company's legal representative Zhu, WeChat is named Kam.

Xiao Yu showed reporters a screenshot of WeChat's chat. In the WeChat group, Zhu insisted that all the money had been handed to Zhou Chen and presented Zhou Chen's personal statement that he had received the money.

Although there were signs and fingerprints on the "statement", Xiao Yu said, "he refused to show the bank's running water and said it was a commercial secret."

Later, Zhu also sent Zhou Chen's phone call to Xiao Yu, but no one answered the phone.

No agreement was signed with the brokerage firm.

The negotiations were fruitless. Xiao Yu and many anchors tried to get in touch with the official broadcasting platform directly.

In November 10th, to broadcast APP, official micro-blog released the official announcement.

According to the statement, the long term cooperation agency for the broadcasting platform is the star Shuo culture studio in Wuqing District of Tianjin. The star culture will be responsible for the cooperation project of recruiting the anchors to the broadcasting platform, entrusted to the natural person Zhu (WeChat name and commonly used name: Ke MOU).

The broadcasting platform and star Shuo culture have never promised Zhu any base salary or minimum service remuneration, and the platform must not cooperate with Zhu himself on the recruitment of anchors.

After that, Zhu did not know the star culture in the cooperative organization, and Zhu entrusted the contract obligations of the above-mentioned cooperation projects to the brokers such as Zhou, Zhou and so on.

It's impossible for the rain to think that the platform will be allowed to alarm as soon as possible. It can wait for more than ten days, but the platform has not yet been alerted.

As a result, Xiao Yu and several "brokers" like her were able to collect evidence and call the police through WeChat screenshots.

However, because the number of injured broadcaster is too large and the area is scattered, the case is temporarily inadmissible.

Reporters repeatedly called "to broadcast" platform official customer service phone, no one answered.

Why did not sign an agreement or contract and other legally binding instruments? "In formal terms, the brokers should collect personal information before they start broadcasting, such as ID cards and bank cards, which should be reported, and then the company will sign an agreement and give it to the anchor."

Xiaoyu said, but this time the 500 anchor information "reported", has not waited for the agreement.

Xiao Yu said.

Because more personnel and scattered areas, and brokers only through WeChat contact.

Even signing an agreement does not guarantee the agreement.

Only the former brokers paid on time, and there was no such incident.

"Live platforms, large or small, hire a lot of brokerage firms."

Xiao Yu said, "with the small live platform cooperation, the first three months will have basic salary support, which is not a secret in the industry."

Wang Huan, a college student who often runs webcast, tells reporters that gifts from fans can be converted into cash when they are broadcast live, and the brokerage company has direct advantages to the anchor.

For example, a live friend received a gift worth 10 yuan, 7 yuan for the live platform, 3 yuan for the netizen, and 7 yuan for the director of the brokerage company, and the anchor had a base salary of several thousand yuan a month.

Experts say

The webcast platform should be clear.

In recent years, the proliferation of webcast industry has been increasing. Many people want to "share a slice of the cake" by developing live App.

In order to attract more netizens and get more traffic, the new live broadcasting platform employs several brokerage firms to recruit large numbers of anchors with the base salary and increase their royalties to help them "get angry".

Some netizens pointed out that on the one hand, the anchors themselves were not vigilant enough to believe in others' opinions. On the other hand, the lack of relevant rules and regulations in the industry as a basis for safeguarding rights is also a problem.

"Rain Ting Twinkle" said, "I hope to make mandatory regulations and regulations earlier, and give a guarantee to the anchor industry."

Reporters learned that the relevant provisions of the internet live broadcast, there are no detailed provisions on the internet live broadcast platform, such as the recruitment of anchor.

"After the popularity of webcast, the state has strengthened the supervision of webcast, but more attention has been paid to the health of the live broadcast," he said. "There are no detailed rules for the economic disputes that may arise in the webcast," said quartz, chairman of the Chinese society of sociology and Chairman of the Shaanxi society of social sciences.

Through this matter, quartz believes that the responsibility of the webcast platform should be clear and similar to any other network regulation. Any violation of the platform should be the primary responsibility.

Quartz believes that if platforms are recruited through brokers, they should carefully check the credit of each brokerage firm and broker.

He said, "in the Internet age, people can sign and pfer without meeting each other, so personal credit and corporate credit are the most important signs in the Internet age."