More Than 200 Double Brand Shoes Of Corrupt Officials Eventually Wear Shackles

And buy hundreds of Yuan moisturizing cream.

The "fashion corrupt official" Ding Meng was sentenced in January 15th to thirteen years in the Chongqing intermediate court.

More than 100 famous brand underwear and more than 100 purple clay pots...

What does this mean?

Apart from illustrating this corrupt official's extravagance, he can only explain us.

The "dull" and numbness of the Department will not be otherwise.

We are too concerned about the number of mistresses who have been investigated and seized and what high-grade items have been investigated and seized and how many beautiful mistresses have been wrapped up after the corruption incident.

Misunderstanding.

In fact, can we identify and find corrupt officials just by wearing high-grade brands?

Several corrupt officials are being seen as anti corruption clues because of wearing fashionable fashion, high grade and high grade, and finally being punished.

Zhou Long's "sky smoke" and the brand name "bad luck" director are, after all, only a very typical exception.

The author noted that the bribery of corrupt officials Ding Meng has been listed six major items.

These six items have a common feature, which is all handled by Ding Meng's illegal actions, and one person receives bribes directly.

As we all know, the approval and alteration of a planning project, the expansion of the real estate construction area and the compensation funds for demolition and relocation are all important matters, and all important interests should not be allowed to be decided by one person.

Why can Ding Meng be able to run smoothly?

Why are rules and regulations such as furnishings and crazy power like cats in a cow pen?

And why, after so many years, the supervision of the units and the superior departments has become completely a pretence?

Is corruption only attributable to the audacity of corrupt officials?

Are these loopholes in the system or man-made reasons leading to the existence of a system? Is it not the most fundamental reason for the frequent corruption?

Is this not a profound lesson we should learn from Ding Meng?

From the point of view, "corrupt officials have 200 pairs of precious leather shoes". The clues behind such incidents are of no significance in keeping pace with the work of anti-corruption.

The most important thing is to build and improve the anti-corruption prevention system as soon as possible, so that officials can not be greedy, greedy or greedy.

This is the only way to stop the similar "200 pairs of famous brand shoes corrupt officials".

Editor: vivi