Opinions On Implementing The Performance Appraisal Of Leading Cadres

In order to further implement the regulations on selection and appointment of leading cadres in the party and government, deepen the reform of the cadre and personnel system, strengthen the sense of responsibility and the concept of purpose of leading cadres of the party and government, set up the correct guidance of cadres according to actual achievements, and advocate a good atmosphere of doing solid work and striving for achievements, so as to scientifically assess cadres and accurately evaluate cadres.

The following opinions are put forward:

I. guiding ideology and principles

Guided by Deng Xiaoping theory and the important thought of "Three Represents", taking deepening the reform of the cadre system as the turning point, taking the building of a contingent of high-quality cadres as the goal, paying attention to the cadre's achievements, paying attention to the masses' recognition level of the cadres, innovating the system, expanding democracy, improving the examination and strengthening supervision, and exploring new ways to establish scientific supervision and evaluation of the achievements of leading cadres, so as to provide a basis for comprehensively and accurately identifying and evaluating cadres and fair and honest treatment of cadres, so as to provide a strong organizational guarantee for the implementation of the "three step strategy" and the construction of "four cities" in our city.

Cadre performance is the concentrated expression and comprehensive reflection of the quality of cadres' moral qualities, and is the basic basis for the use of cadres.

The quality of cadres must be reflected in their achievements.

The recognition and evaluation of cadres' achievements should be comprehensive, objective, realistic and scientific, so as to prevent unilateralism and simplification.

We should not only look at the achievements of the current work, but also the achievements in basic and long-term work; we should not only look at the size of work achievements, but also look at the working conditions and conditions for achieving these achievements; we should not only focus on the effectiveness of daily work, but also on the decision-making ability and work effectiveness in important periods, important work and major events; we should not only pay attention to the effectiveness of material civilization, but also pay attention to the effectiveness of spiritual civilization.

Adhere to the correct direction of employing, appraise the achievements with merit, and regard development as a hero.

The people who have the ability to do things, those who have the opportunity and the ability to do things, have the stage and do things.

In the practice of reform and construction, cadres with outstanding achievements will be promoted and reused, and the leading bodies that are not suited to the requirements of leapfrog development should be adjusted and exchanged in a timely manner.

Two, clear the content of assessment, improve the methods of assessment.

The implementation of performance appraisal for leading cadres is an effective measure to implement the regulations on selection and appointment of leading cadres.

(1) on the object of performance appraisal, we changed the traditional practice of "one digit and one digit", focusing on the achievement of the "leader" in the party and government.

Departments and units should subdivide their work according to the post responsibilities of leading cadres, strengthen responsibilities and clarify tasks so as to make qualitative performance assessment contents.

(two) in setting up the contents of performance appraisal, focusing on the overall goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way in our city, and dividing the basic items and main indicators of cadre performance appraisal according to the characteristics of the block work and the responsibilities and tasks of the town, street and municipal departments, the basic items and main indicators of the performance appraisal are divided into qualitative ones.

The performance appraisal of the main leaders of town and street is composed of three parts: first, in terms of economic construction, the main contents are gross domestic product, fiscal revenue, warehousing tax, investment attraction, per capita net income of farmers, and the situation of clearing money and debt.

Two, in terms of spiritual civilization construction and social development, the key points are family planning, science and technology education, health and environmental protection, farmers' burden reduction, letters and visits, safe production and comprehensive administration of social security.

Three, on the aspect of political civilization construction, the key is the overall function of the leading body and the diligent and honest administration of the team members, the completion of the major assault tasks assigned by the superiors, the construction of grass-roots party organizations and the construction of Party members.

The performance appraisal of the leading Party and government leaders in the municipal departments and subordinate units includes four aspects, namely, the leading group building, the cadre team building, the party conduct and clean government construction, and investment promotion. In addition, according to the different functional characteristics of departments, the specific circumstances of each unit, and the implementation of the key work objectives and objectives determined by the annual main tasks at the upper level,

(three) in the ways and means of performance appraisal, we should adopt one year one assessment, three years summary, and adopt a combination of leadership and the masses, regular and irregular combination, and establish and improve the performance appraisal files for leading cadres.

In the year-end examination, we should collect personal reports and self-evaluation, democratic evaluation, on-site investigation, individual discussions, and seek relevant departments' opinions, so as to collect the performance of leading cadres comprehensively and accurately. Finally, the opinions of the inspection teams are put forward to determine the assessment times.

First, establish and improve the performance archives of leading cadres.

At the beginning of each year, the organization department will organize the major leaders of various departments and towns to fill in the performance record cards, and carry out the whole process tracking management and supervision in accordance with the annual work objectives filled in the file cards.

At the same time, the municipal Party committee will conduct a comprehensive assessment of the performance of leading cadres at the end of each year. Strict standards and serious procedures should be adopted to sort out the achievements in different categories. We should take a look at the position and look at the changes, and evaluate and measure the performance of cadres objectively and fairly.

Two, we should improve the inspection system for performance appraisal and ensure that the achievement is practical and comprehensive.

(1) establish an information exchange system for achievements.

A joint meeting of relevant departments shall be convened regularly by the Organization Department, and the actual performance of leading cadres should be collected in a timely manner.

(2) implementing a joint inspection system.

The joint inspection of the achievements of the leading cadres of the party and government by relevant departments such as discipline inspection, supervision, finance, personnel, auditing, statistics and other related departments will be conducted in order to grasp all aspects of the situation.

(3) trial implementation of public announcement system.

The main economic indicators of the assessed subjects and other data showing the actual work performance are publicized through the media to the public and publicly accepted by the masses.

Three, strengthen measures and scientifically use results of performance appraisal.

The application of performance appraisal results is the key to implementing the performance appraisal of leading cadres. The implementation of rewards and punishments can play an incentive and constraint role. At the same time, it is also a concrete manifestation of cadres' performance.

Those who are outstanding in performance appraisal for 3 consecutive years should be promoted and reused while giving appropriate economic rewards. They should be demoted for the purpose of failing to complete their work targets for two consecutive years, engaging in digital games, making false achievements, and doing superficial work. They should be exempting from the drifting part of the work which is floating and not being honest. For the masses who are dissatisfied with more than 1/3 cadres, they should be treated for post. After the completion of the posts, the work will not improve and the masses still have their opinions. They should be demoted or dismissed for treatment.

Four, strengthen leadership, conscientiously organize and ensure the smooth progress of cadre performance appraisal work.

The implementation of performance appraisal for leading cadres is a systematic and complex work, involving a wide range of policies.

In order to strengthen the leadership of this work, the municipal Party committee decided to set up a performance evaluation leading group composed of relevant departments such as organization, discipline inspection, supervision, finance, letters and visits, auditing and so on. The specific work is carried out by the municipal Party Committee Organization Department, and the Office is set up in the organization department.

We should carry out the responsibility investigation system for cadre investigation.

All relevant departments should strictly abide by the requirements of the municipal Party committee, conscientiously organize discipline, conscientiously perform their duties, supervise each other, coordinate with each other, cooperate closely and cooperate with each other to ensure that the performance appraisal work of cadres is carried out.

If the false information is provided that leads to the appraisal of the performance of the leading cadres, it will be held accountable for the malpractice of favoritism and the concealment of the truth.